Anonymous wrote:Here's the optimistic scenario: the new employee wins the right to kick the dog out of the office, and everyone else in the office including the owner hates the new employee. Then the employee still suffers lack of career growth, files a lawsuit on grounds of retaliation, maybe wins, leaves the company, and still has a stunted career.
The alternative is to appreciate the incredibly valuable perk of working from home (avoiding commute time and cost), while making an effort to engage with coworkers virtually or at off-site meals and drinks and walks, developing valuable networking skills and being appreciated for being a real team player.
Anonymous wrote:I’m very allergic to dogs but I have a small hypoallergenic dog that’s bathed weekly. I can still be around dogs as long as they’re hypoallergenic, bathed often and I don’t touch them. You’d think an office dog would be non shedding?
To be fair though I’m very allergic to cockroaches and my federal agency would do nothing about it. I was a snotty sneezing mess at work. I was told it’s against the law to spray in federal buildings (they’d have to shut down the building and send everyone home) I had visible cockroaches on my desk every morning. They set out little sticky traps and that was all they’d do. They said the old dc sewers were the issue. I think workplaces just don’t give AF about allergies. I got a new job after 2 years of dealing with that mess. Annoying.
Anonymous wrote:yeah, sorry, that's not the way the law works. if working from home would hurt his career, that's not an adequate accommodation.
What proof do you have that working from home would hurt his career?
yeah, sorry, that's not the way the law works. if working from home would hurt his career, that's not an adequate accommodation.