Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:All of these schools will lose kids in 5th to charters - that's just the way of it.
OP, I have an above grade level kid at Seaton and have been happy; they'll be in a swing space on Bryant Street the next couple years which will be even closer to you. I don't love the amount of screens they use but my guess is that screen use is pretty consistent across the DCPSs as they all use the same curriculum. I would guess our experience would be pretty similar to Garrison and John Lewis (I know both have great teachers and admin).
OP here - thank you! I didn't see this before I posted. I've actually been surprised on tours about the variation of screen usage even within DCPS, though everyone gave me basically the same party line at EdFest. Thomson, for example, stood out - basically every single kid I saw who was not in PK was either on a laptop or watching a movie. It was so bad. While John Lewis and Ross had much, much less.
How are you feeling about the swing space? We actually live in between the permanent site and the swing space so both would be fine for our commute. Do you think you'll lose a lot of kids next year? I know Tubman saw a HUGE drop in enrollment when they moved to their swing space.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:All of these schools will lose kids in 5th to charters - that's just the way of it.
OP, I have an above grade level kid at Seaton and have been happy; they'll be in a swing space on Bryant Street the next couple years which will be even closer to you. I don't love the amount of screens they use but my guess is that screen use is pretty consistent across the DCPSs as they all use the same curriculum. I would guess our experience would be pretty similar to Garrison and John Lewis (I know both have great teachers and admin).
OP here - thank you! I didn't see this before I posted. I've actually been surprised on tours about the variation of screen usage even within DCPS, though everyone gave me basically the same party line at EdFest. Thomson, for example, stood out - basically every single kid I saw who was not in PK was either on a laptop or watching a movie. It was so bad. While John Lewis and Ross had much, much less.
How are you feeling about the swing space? We actually live in between the permanent site and the swing space so both would be fine for our commute. Do you think you'll lose a lot of kids next year? I know Tubman saw a HUGE drop in enrollment when they moved to their swing space.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have friends(bilingual) at EL Haynes who probably could have sent their kids(k, 2nd) anywhere in the area, but specifically chose EL Haynes and they rave about it.
Toured Francis recently and would probably only consider it at K and above.
The facility indoors and out is fantastic, seems to have a strong PTA, TONS of afterschool groups and options. Didnt notice much tech use, though students are testign currently, which evidently is done in laptops.
A potential passive issue there is the cramped parking for faculty, which could lead to some latent frustrations on their end.. its an odd arrangement.
Also toured ITS and thought it was interesting. Seems completely adequate if not slightly more than, regarding atmosphere, education, classroom leadership. The issues imo are the grounds, both indoor and out as well as their approach (and certain other schools as well).. to conflict resolution... The ground are fine but its an older facility thats seems to be kept in just ok condition. In some classrooms its fairly dark for whatever reason. And the field and track, connect to the local rec, which is fine.. but it also allows for the community to use the grounds the same time school kids would be out there.. which i wasnt crazy about, but understand the neccessity of use by the school.
Seaton would be a cut above the others imo, if not the swing space which is in a not great area
Fair review-- ITDS is very adequate, which is no small thing if you've experienced inadequate!
FYI, ITDS does not own the field or the red playground. It's a DPR field and playground that ITDS has certain use of, but does not control or maintain and cannot keep people off of. I will say it's nice to have the rec center available to the school sometimes and as an after school hangout, and also for parents to work out after dropoff.
Some of the teachers do prefer dim lighting, which I think is weird, but they do all have functional lights if they choose to turn them on.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Parent of a current 2nd grader at John Lewis, been at the school since K, and have been really happy with the core educational experience as well as the school community, level of parent and staff involvement in extracurriculars, and the fact that there are more than the minimum number of required specials so things rotate throughout the year.
If you care about foreign language, you should know that there is no language as a special. The school play is incredible but is not a guarantee you child can be in it except for PK students who are all in the show (otherwise, it's an audition process).
OP here - thank you for this! We loved the tour and were really impressed.
Do you think you'll stay at least through 4th? Do you get the feeling most of your child's friends will stick through 4th? (I know 5th is always a bit of a wildcard everywhere).
Anonymous wrote:I have friends(bilingual) at EL Haynes who probably could have sent their kids(k, 2nd) anywhere in the area, but specifically chose EL Haynes and they rave about it.
Toured Francis recently and would probably only consider it at K and above.
The facility indoors and out is fantastic, seems to have a strong PTA, TONS of afterschool groups and options. Didnt notice much tech use, though students are testign currently, which evidently is done in laptops.
A potential passive issue there is the cramped parking for faculty, which could lead to some latent frustrations on their end.. its an odd arrangement.
Also toured ITS and thought it was interesting. Seems completely adequate if not slightly more than, regarding atmosphere, education, classroom leadership. The issues imo are the grounds, both indoor and out as well as their approach (and certain other schools as well).. to conflict resolution... The ground are fine but its an older facility thats seems to be kept in just ok condition. In some classrooms its fairly dark for whatever reason. And the field and track, connect to the local rec, which is fine.. but it also allows for the community to use the grounds the same time school kids would be out there.. which i wasnt crazy about, but understand the neccessity of use by the school.
Seaton would be a cut above the others imo, if not the swing space which is in a not great area
Anonymous wrote:Not OP.
I am on the Hill with a rising K and PK3.
Just visited Lee and ITDS in the last two weeks. I came away liking Lee more - nice, well-lit classrooms, peaceful location back in a neighborhood, and seemed well-run. My kids were in Montessori daycare and seem to thrive in that model.
ITDS facilities seemed a bit grubby. Vibes weren’t as good in my opinion. Way less chance of getting into ITDS, but also seems like it would be a good option into higher grades than Lee.
This thread caused me to take a closer look at their school report cards and, at the end of the day, I’m probably swapping them so that Lee is my #6 and ITDS my #5 because of those troubling test scores and belief that Montessori is great for young children but probably can’t take you the distance the way ITDS could.