Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think if you don’t have a good test score, go with Duke TO.
Has a 35 ACT superscore. Is that strong enough to compensate for the B+'s?
It never fully compensates your gpa. It’s just an evidence of your academic competence.
Look at naviance. If they accepted kids in the same gpa range before, then it’s unlikely an issue. This is so school specific. No one can advise you.
This, at the two private schools my kids attend, multiple B pluses would put a kid out of contention at all three unless a recruited athlete.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:“Least competitive” isn’t really a think when you’re taking about schools with acceptance rates like these. Need to go down the rankings list for that, even from a rigorous private.
Do all applicants apply with 4.0?
Sadly the school is a bit grade deflationary.
Anonymous wrote:3.95uw sounds high for 3 B/B+?
Note - you know your high school. This thread can give you some guidance. At our private, 3.8uw with a 35, can work for Brown for a male.
This might help you?
https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1255948.page
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think if you don’t have a good test score, go with Duke TO.
Has a 35 ACT superscore. Is that strong enough to compensate for the B+'s?
It never fully compensates your gpa. It’s just an evidence of your academic competence.
Look at naviance. If they accepted kids in the same gpa range before, then it’s unlikely an issue. This is so school specific. No one can advise you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think if you don’t have a good test score, go with Duke TO.
Has a 35 ACT superscore. Is that strong enough to compensate for the B+'s?
No way.
It depends on the HS though. At our private, those B+ are fine at Brown, if a hard class or not in major.
Less so at Duke, unless hooked.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If your kid is at a rigorous private school, you should be asking your kid's guidance counselor, not this board.
This. You pay a lot of money for these kind of benefits, and this is what they're there for.
Anonymous wrote:If your kid is at a rigorous private school, you should be asking your kid's guidance counselor, not this board.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DP- also with a child who will have a B+ or two in current junior year. So if you have a few B+ grades in academic subjects you should just not bother applying to top 20 schools unless you have an outstanding EC/hook/meet institutional prioririties? Is this because your cumulative gpa will be below a certain cutoff and they will toss your application out without looking at anything else ? Does this apply even if you have a standardized test score in their top 25%? Is there any way to make up for the B+ ? Thx for any insight !
What is approx class rank? Even if no official class rank, AOs have a sense. If not top 20% do not apply, unless possibly ED1 at Chicago if close to top 20% and 1550 and not Econ or oversubscribed major…
School doesn't rank and AO won't tell us. But we estimate about 15-25%
Did others in that range get into these schools last year? If not it's probably a little optimistic.
According to our school naviance, some got in below and others above her gpa. Unweighted gpa is about 3.95.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think if you don’t have a good test score, go with Duke TO.
Has a 35 ACT superscore. Is that strong enough to compensate for the B+'s?
No way.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:“Least competitive” isn’t really a think when you’re taking about schools with acceptance rates like these. Need to go down the rankings list for that, even from a rigorous private.
Do all applicants apply with 4.0?
Sadly the school is a bit grade deflationary.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think if you don’t have a good test score, go with Duke TO.
Has a 35 ACT superscore. Is that strong enough to compensate for the B+'s?