Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would consider GMU as a good alternate if VT does not work out. They have good Engineering and CS. For kids in the higher stats quartile, I would consider GMU a safety. But if the stats are lower, then GMU might become another "target" and not a safety
this. GMU engineering is held in high regard
Ugh, that can't be comparable to a big, real university like VT. GMU is just basically like an expensive NVCC. No fun vibes.
If you’re paying big bucks for a “fun vibe”, you’re doing it wrong. In the meantime, we Virginia residents will continue to take advantage of the great value that is GMU.
Finding an affordable OOS flagship is well worth it. Football is more important than you seem to realize.
Not to everyone.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would consider GMU as a good alternate if VT does not work out. They have good Engineering and CS. For kids in the higher stats quartile, I would consider GMU a safety. But if the stats are lower, then GMU might become another "target" and not a safety
this. GMU engineering is held in high regard
Ugh, that can't be comparable to a big, real university like VT. GMU is just basically like an expensive NVCC. No fun vibes.
If you’re paying big bucks for a “fun vibe”, you’re doing it wrong. In the meantime, we Virginia residents will continue to take advantage of the great value that is GMU.
Finding an affordable OOS flagship is well worth it. Football is more important than you seem to realize.
Anonymous wrote:For us it was Penn state
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would consider GMU as a good alternate if VT does not work out. They have good Engineering and CS. For kids in the higher stats quartile, I would consider GMU a safety. But if the stats are lower, then GMU might become another "target" and not a safety
this. GMU engineering is held in high regard
Ugh, that can't be comparable to a big, real university like VT. GMU is just basically like an expensive NVCC. No fun vibes.
If you’re paying big bucks for a “fun vibe”, you’re doing it wrong. In the meantime, we Virginia residents will continue to take advantage of the great value that is GMU.
Finding an affordable OOS flagship is well worth it. Football is more important than you seem to realize.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would consider GMU as a good alternate if VT does not work out. They have good Engineering and CS. For kids in the higher stats quartile, I would consider GMU a safety. But if the stats are lower, then GMU might become another "target" and not a safety
this. GMU engineering is held in high regard
Ugh, that can't be comparable to a big, real university like VT. GMU is just basically like an expensive NVCC. No fun vibes.
If you’re paying big bucks for a “fun vibe”, you’re doing it wrong. In the meantime, we Virginia residents will continue to take advantage of the great value that is GMU.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would consider GMU as a good alternate if VT does not work out. They have good Engineering and CS. For kids in the higher stats quartile, I would consider GMU a safety. But if the stats are lower, then GMU might become another "target" and not a safety
this. GMU engineering is held in high regard
Ugh, that can't be comparable to a big, real university like VT. GMU is just basically like an expensive NVCC. No fun vibes.
If you’re paying big bucks for a “fun vibe”, you’re doing it wrong. In the meantime, we Virginia residents will continue to take advantage of the great value that is GMU.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would consider GMU as a good alternate if VT does not work out. They have good Engineering and CS. For kids in the higher stats quartile, I would consider GMU a safety. But if the stats are lower, then GMU might become another "target" and not a safety
this. GMU engineering is held in high regard
Ugh, that can't be comparable to a big, real university like VT. GMU is just basically like an expensive NVCC. No fun vibes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:VT non-engineering is much easier than VT engineering. JMU does not offer specific engineering degrees, so I am guessing srudent is not an engineering applicant.
It's increasingly not "much easier" at all.
That is not what the SCHEV data says.
Cite?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would consider GMU as a good alternate if VT does not work out. They have good Engineering and CS. For kids in the higher stats quartile, I would consider GMU a safety. But if the stats are lower, then GMU might become another "target" and not a safety
this. GMU engineering is held in high regard
Ugh, that can't be comparable to a big, real university like VT. GMU is just basically like an expensive NVCC. No fun vibes.
Anonymous wrote:My kid was high honors at NOVA and as a result VT, UVA and W&M were their safety schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wish VT would just reimplement ED so those who have it as their first choice could express that!!
Or they can implement what all these other major flagships do for EA and notify earlier than late Feb!!!
ED would be preferable so that those for whom VT is their first choice can express that in no uncertain terms.