Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You definitely need a lawyer. Maybe look at total assets so as you earn more each year and her trust builds you remain financial equals in the marriage. Maybe she pulls out of the trust the equivalent of your salary.
No matter what you do your high six figure to seven figure salary will be a marital asset so you will have 99% of the family income and HHI. Her money is all locked away and won't be considered family assets - yours isn't.
You need a lawyer to help you figure out how to remain financial equals in the marriage.
"Maybe she pulls out of the trust the equivalent of your salary." You clearly know nothing about trusts. First of all, she might not even be the trustee. There might be a corporate trustee who has to follow the rules of the trust. And the rules of the trust are unlikely to allow her to pull high six figures out. Most trusts require you to consider other assets - meaning his salary.
It would be better for OP to marry someone who does not have a trust fund and who has similar earning potential and work ethic. They could build their own wealth together. The current situation seems to involve a control and power imbalance, which is unfair. His spouse’s trust disincentivizes her to work hard and contribute to the marital pot because we she has enough in her own pot that he’ll never get. Just don’t make the same mistake I did by marrying someone whose parents are financially irresponsible and end up taking all your money. It's even worse than dealing with wealthy, controlling in-laws. At least they don't take.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This marriage seems to be in trouble already based on your description. We are leaving our child mid-eight figures (as you would describe it). You can bet there will be a prenup.
If I were in DD’s parent’s shoes, I would probably agree to fund grandchildren’s education and chip in on a house but insist on a prenup.
Why do you say the marriage seems to be in trouble and then also say “you bet there will be a prenup”?
The very idea of a prenup is to think about what happens if the marriage falls apart— so do you think a prenup makes that more likely but you are ok with that, or do you think a prenup for someone else is a bad sign but for your kid it isn’t?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You definitely need a lawyer. Maybe look at total assets so as you earn more each year and her trust builds you remain financial equals in the marriage. Maybe she pulls out of the trust the equivalent of your salary.
No matter what you do your high six figure to seven figure salary will be a marital asset so you will have 99% of the family income and HHI. Her money is all locked away and won't be considered family assets - yours isn't.
You need a lawyer to help you figure out how to remain financial equals in the marriage.
"Maybe she pulls out of the trust the equivalent of your salary." You clearly know nothing about trusts. First of all, she might not even be the trustee. There might be a corporate trustee who has to follow the rules of the trust. And the rules of the trust are unlikely to allow her to pull high six figures out. Most trusts require you to consider other assets - meaning his salary.
Anonymous wrote:Clearly the wife should have income pulled from the trust every year to match the husbands income.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm in a similar, gender swapped, situation on a /much/ smaller scale. Even down to meeting my husband when I was finishing subspecialty training and just starting a lucrative partnership track job in my early 30's. Husband didn't want to touch trust, so we basically live off my income while his savings remains premarital assets and untouched and he works a modestly paid public interest job. In our case, we created a stepwise system where I gradually become his beneficiary of that trust to a max 1/3 after 20 years. We are currently at year 17! The remainder is split evenly between his son and our son. It makes my husband feel better because his premarital assets remain intact with the majority passing to our kids. And I'm fine with being the breadwinner and saving less because it functionally acts like savings for me.
If anyone thinks this is too much, especially when there are step kids involved, I'll point out my income funded private school, college, and grad school for my stepson. Things my husband would have had to dig into the trust for had I not been in the picture. He stopped the big law lifestyle when he met me and was also able to spend much more time at home and with both kids.
"I'll point out my income funded private school, college, and grad school for my stepson." You're an idiot for paying for this. He absolutely should have used the trust fund for this.
I agree. Why would you pay for a stepson‘s education if the father sits on a trust fund? Weird
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm in a similar, gender swapped, situation on a /much/ smaller scale. Even down to meeting my husband when I was finishing subspecialty training and just starting a lucrative partnership track job in my early 30's. Husband didn't want to touch trust, so we basically live off my income while his savings remains premarital assets and untouched and he works a modestly paid public interest job. In our case, we created a stepwise system where I gradually become his beneficiary of that trust to a max 1/3 after 20 years. We are currently at year 17! The remainder is split evenly between his son and our son. It makes my husband feel better because his premarital assets remain intact with the majority passing to our kids. And I'm fine with being the breadwinner and saving less because it functionally acts like savings for me.
If anyone thinks this is too much, especially when there are step kids involved, I'll point out my income funded private school, college, and grad school for my stepson. Things my husband would have had to dig into the trust for had I not been in the picture. He stopped the big law lifestyle when he met me and was also able to spend much more time at home and with both kids.
"I'll point out my income funded private school, college, and grad school for my stepson." You're an idiot for paying for this. He absolutely should have used the trust fund for this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You definitely need a lawyer. Maybe look at total assets so as you earn more each year and her trust builds you remain financial equals in the marriage. Maybe she pulls out of the trust the equivalent of your salary.
No matter what you do your high six figure to seven figure salary will be a marital asset so you will have 99% of the family income and HHI. Her money is all locked away and won't be considered family assets - yours isn't.
You need a lawyer to help you figure out how to remain financial equals in the marriage.
"Maybe she pulls out of the trust the equivalent of your salary." You clearly know nothing about trusts. First of all, she might not even be the trustee. There might be a corporate trustee who has to follow the rules of the trust. And the rules of the trust are unlikely to allow her to pull high six figures out. Most trusts require you to consider other assets - meaning his salary.
It would be better for OP to marry someone who does not have a trust fund and who has similar earning potential and work ethic. They could build their own wealth together. The current situation seems to involve a control and power imbalance, which is unfair. His spouse’s trust disincentivizes her to work hard and contribute to the marital pot because we she has enough in her own pot that he’ll never get. Just don’t make the same mistake I did by marrying someone whose parents are financially irresponsible and end up taking all your money. It's even worse than dealing with wealthy, controlling in-laws. At least they don't take.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You definitely need a lawyer. Maybe look at total assets so as you earn more each year and her trust builds you remain financial equals in the marriage. Maybe she pulls out of the trust the equivalent of your salary.
No matter what you do your high six figure to seven figure salary will be a marital asset so you will have 99% of the family income and HHI. Her money is all locked away and won't be considered family assets - yours isn't.
You need a lawyer to help you figure out how to remain financial equals in the marriage.
"Maybe she pulls out of the trust the equivalent of your salary." You clearly know nothing about trusts. First of all, she might not even be the trustee. There might be a corporate trustee who has to follow the rules of the trust. And the rules of the trust are unlikely to allow her to pull high six figures out. Most trusts require you to consider other assets - meaning his salary.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You definitely need a lawyer. Maybe look at total assets so as you earn more each year and her trust builds you remain financial equals in the marriage. Maybe she pulls out of the trust the equivalent of your salary.
No matter what you do your high six figure to seven figure salary will be a marital asset so you will have 99% of the family income and HHI. Her money is all locked away and won't be considered family assets - yours isn't.
You need a lawyer to help you figure out how to remain financial equals in the marriage.
"Maybe she pulls out of the trust the equivalent of your salary." You clearly know nothing about trusts. First of all, she might not even be the trustee. There might be a corporate trustee who has to follow the rules of the trust. And the rules of the trust are unlikely to allow her to pull high six figures out. Most trusts require you to consider other assets - meaning his salary.
Anonymous wrote:You definitely need a lawyer. Maybe look at total assets so as you earn more each year and her trust builds you remain financial equals in the marriage. Maybe she pulls out of the trust the equivalent of your salary.
No matter what you do your high six figure to seven figure salary will be a marital asset so you will have 99% of the family income and HHI. Her money is all locked away and won't be considered family assets - yours isn't.
You need a lawyer to help you figure out how to remain financial equals in the marriage.
Anonymous wrote:I'm in a similar, gender swapped, situation on a /much/ smaller scale. Even down to meeting my husband when I was finishing subspecialty training and just starting a lucrative partnership track job in my early 30's. Husband didn't want to touch trust, so we basically live off my income while his savings remains premarital assets and untouched and he works a modestly paid public interest job. In our case, we created a stepwise system where I gradually become his beneficiary of that trust to a max 1/3 after 20 years. We are currently at year 17! The remainder is split evenly between his son and our son. It makes my husband feel better because his premarital assets remain intact with the majority passing to our kids. And I'm fine with being the breadwinner and saving less because it functionally acts like savings for me.
If anyone thinks this is too much, especially when there are step kids involved, I'll point out my income funded private school, college, and grad school for my stepson. Things my husband would have had to dig into the trust for had I not been in the picture. He stopped the big law lifestyle when he met me and was also able to spend much more time at home and with both kids.