Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does anyone have any thoughts on schools like Santa Clara, Loyola, and San Diego? Out East and DD wants to head west.
Not SLAC/UC: USC is only one worth the money and all the way to the west coast. Of course there is Stanford but.
Disagree strongly. Ask any Californian. It’s a rich kid party school. University of Spoled Children. It’s reached its “fame” through hiring expensive marketers like Northeastern and Chicago have done. And it’s $99k a year
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does anyone have any thoughts on schools like Santa Clara, Loyola, and San Diego? Out East and DD wants to head west.
Not SLAC/UC: USC is only one worth the money and all the way to the west coast. Of course there is Stanford but.
Disagree strongly. Ask any Californian. It’s a rich kid party school. University of Spoled Children. It’s reached its “fame” through hiring expensive marketers like Northeastern and Chicago have done. And it’s $99k a year
Someone from 1981 stumbled into the conversation.
No need to be rude. I agree. And I’m commenting from so cal which I assume the moderator can confirm. It’s a party school that has made its name upon extreme marketing measures just as Northeastern has. Are you a californuan6? Are you posting near USC? I an
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does anyone have any thoughts on schools like Santa Clara, Loyola, and San Diego? Out East and DD wants to head west.
Not SLAC/UC: USC is only one worth the money and all the way to the west coast. Of course there is Stanford but.
Disagree strongly. Ask any Californian. It’s a rich kid party school. University of Spoled Children. It’s reached its “fame” through hiring expensive marketers like Northeastern and Chicago have done. And it’s $99k a year
Someone from 1981 stumbled into the conversation.
No need to be rude. I agree. And I’m commenting from so cal which I assume the moderator can confirm. It’s a party school that has made its name upon extreme marketing measures just as Northeastern has. Are you a californuan6? Are you posting near USC? I an
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does anyone have any thoughts on schools like Santa Clara, Loyola, and San Diego? Out East and DD wants to head west.
Not SLAC/UC: USC is only one worth the money and all the way to the west coast. Of course there is Stanford but.
Disagree strongly. Ask any Californian. It’s a rich kid party school. University of Spoled Children. It’s reached its “fame” through hiring expensive marketers like Northeastern and Chicago have done. And it’s $99k a year
Someone from 1981 stumbled into the conversation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does anyone have any thoughts on schools like Santa Clara, Loyola, and San Diego? Out East and DD wants to head west.
Not SLAC/UC: USC is only one worth the money and all the way to the west coast. Of course there is Stanford but.
Disagree strongly. Ask any Californian. It’s a rich kid party school. University of Spoled Children. It’s reached its “fame” through hiring expensive marketers like Northeastern and Chicago have done. And it’s $99k a year
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m the PP who loved Loyola - can’t say exactly why - vibes mostly. We toured Oxy and my DC see deemed it “cultish”, UCLA was too big and other schools, USC “not diverse”. LMU checked all the boxes. Potentially helped by the fact that our tour guide was from the DMV as well….
USC is just as, if not more diverse than all the schools you mentioned.
No, go look at the actual numbers. USC wants to pretend it’s 50% students of color, but is only 6% black, which is particularly interesting since Watts and Compton are only two exits away on the freeway.
Sorry since when do only black Americans count as diversity?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does anyone have any thoughts on schools like Santa Clara, Loyola, and San Diego? Out East and DD wants to head west.
Not SLAC/UC: USC is only one worth the money and all the way to the west coast. Of course there is Stanford but.
Disagree strongly. Ask any Californian. It’s a rich kid party school. University of Spoled Children. It’s reached its “fame” through hiring expensive marketers like Northeastern and Chicago have done. And it’s $99k a year
No, you don’t speak for all Californians. Unfortunately the nation’s top privates are now nearing 100k. Disgusting yes. I don’t disagree. But USC holds a lot of lore in So Cal. It’s similar to how people feel about Notre Dame. Huge networking, loyal fans, Trojan love, beautiful campus, excellent academics.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does anyone have any thoughts on schools like Santa Clara, Loyola, and San Diego? Out East and DD wants to head west.
Not SLAC/UC: USC is only one worth the money and all the way to the west coast. Of course there is Stanford but.
Disagree strongly. Ask any Californian. It’s a rich kid party school. University of Spoled Children. It’s reached its “fame” through hiring expensive marketers like Northeastern and Chicago have done. And it’s $99k a year
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does anyone have any thoughts on schools like Santa Clara, Loyola, and San Diego? Out East and DD wants to head west.
Not SLAC/UC: USC is only one worth the money and all the way to the west coast. Of course there is Stanford but.