Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If they would eliminate PE as a requirement I might be more okay with this. 😏
Or gender studies. Totally unnecessary
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The continued problem with using other countries as the basis for making changes, is that holistic changes are not made. For example, less standardize testing before HS. Or nationalized K-12 curriculum and teachers training. etc.
The #1 problem with USA "competitiveness" is that other countries don't bother to try to raise the floor of performance. They have cuts for school.
Anonymous wrote:If they would eliminate PE as a requirement I might be more okay with this. 😏
Anonymous wrote:If they would eliminate PE as a requirement I might be more okay with this. 😏
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wait what? "will be requiring 300 minutes of math a week [an hour a day] in grades K-8 starting in 2027, which is way more than middle schools offer currently"
Why aren't middle schools offering an hour a day of math? Students in middle school are there from 8:15-3:00. That is 6 hours and 45 minutes. Why can't math be an hour a day?
What also would be better would be to have actual math textbooks with WORKED EXAMPLES, direct instruction and workbooks like every other country that is highly ranked in math.
Because to offer an hour a day of math in middle school, you would either need to have 6 60-minute periods a day (only 1 elective) or two math periods out of seven 45-ish minute periods a day (only 1 elective) and MCPS has (rightly in my view) decided not to do either.
There are only 6 hrs 45 minutes in a middle school day, and once you account for lunch and passing periods, it's down to about 6 hours. So that means the rest could be 6 one-hour periods or 7 43-ish minute periods.
If it is 6 one-hour periods, kids can only take one elective (zero if they are at a school that requires foreign language.) If it is seven 43 minute periods kids would need 7 periods to be spent on math per week to get to 300 minutes, so at most they could have 1 full elective plus a three-day-a-week elective (and that may be too complicated schedule-wise so it may just be 1 elective.)
I may not be understanding your math here, but remember that you can't really use the "excess" 45 minutes for lunch and passing periods under your scenario because kids have math during different periods, so all period lengths need to be the same for everyone. So you basically need 6 periods for the 5 MS core courses English, World Studies, Math, PE/Health, Science) and lunch. And if your kid is in a magnet program, they have a required 7th period (for humanities it's media). So that means someone in a magnet program doesn't have any foreign language or other elective at all.
Of course, the
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wait what? "will be requiring 300 minutes of math a week [an hour a day] in grades K-8 starting in 2027, which is way more than middle schools offer currently"
Why aren't middle schools offering an hour a day of math? Students in middle school are there from 8:15-3:00. That is 6 hours and 45 minutes. Why can't math be an hour a day?
What also would be better would be to have actual math textbooks with WORKED EXAMPLES, direct instruction and workbooks like every other country that is highly ranked in math.
Because to offer an hour a day of math in middle school, you would either need to have 6 60-minute periods a day (only 1 elective) or two math periods out of seven 45-ish minute periods a day (only 1 elective) and MCPS has (rightly in my view) decided not to do either.
There are only 6 hrs 45 minutes in a middle school day, and once you account for lunch and passing periods, it's down to about 6 hours. So that means the rest could be 6 one-hour periods or 7 43-ish minute periods.
If it is 6 one-hour periods, kids can only take one elective (zero if they are at a school that requires foreign language.) If it is seven 43 minute periods kids would need 7 periods to be spent on math per week to get to 300 minutes, so at most they could have 1 full elective plus a three-day-a-week elective (and that may be too complicated schedule-wise so it may just be 1 elective.)
I may not be understanding your math here, but remember that you can't really use the "excess" 45 minutes for lunch and passing periods under your scenario because kids have math during different periods, so all period lengths need to be the same for everyone. So you basically need 6 periods for the 5 MS core courses English, World Studies, Math, PE/Health, Science) and lunch. And if your kid is in a magnet program, they have a required 7th period (for humanities it's media). So that means someone in a magnet program doesn't have any foreign language or other elective at all.
Of course, the
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wait what? "will be requiring 300 minutes of math a week [an hour a day] in grades K-8 starting in 2027, which is way more than middle schools offer currently"
Why aren't middle schools offering an hour a day of math? Students in middle school are there from 8:15-3:00. That is 6 hours and 45 minutes. Why can't math be an hour a day?
What also would be better would be to have actual math textbooks with WORKED EXAMPLES, direct instruction and workbooks like every other country that is highly ranked in math.
Because to offer an hour a day of math in middle school, you would either need to have 6 60-minute periods a day (only 1 elective) or two math periods out of seven 45-ish minute periods a day (only 1 elective) and MCPS has (rightly in my view) decided not to do either.
There are only 6 hrs 45 minutes in a middle school day, and once you account for lunch and passing periods, it's down to about 6 hours. So that means the rest could be 6 one-hour periods or 7 43-ish minute periods.
If it is 6 one-hour periods, kids can only take one elective (zero if they are at a school that requires foreign language.) If it is seven 43 minute periods kids would need 7 periods to be spent on math per week to get to 300 minutes, so at most they could have 1 full elective plus a three-day-a-week elective (and that may be too complicated schedule-wise so it may just be 1 elective.)
Anonymous wrote:It's super easy to add 15 minutes of instruction. Just tell kids to log on to IXL or Khan at home, or in adtecare at school, and do a problem set. It's better than what they'd get in class for 15minutes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:2027-2028 year is the same year that the quite famous new regional high school programs start
Yet MCPS hasn't even started talking about how to handle this new MS math minutes mandate.
Is there going to be further guidance from the state? All I can think is the whole state must be facing the same issues.
Anonymous wrote:2027-2028 year is the same year that the quite famous new regional high school programs start
Yet MCPS hasn't even started talking about how to handle this new MS math minutes mandate.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wait what? "will be requiring 300 minutes of math a week [an hour a day] in grades K-8 starting in 2027, which is way more than middle schools offer currently"
Why aren't middle schools offering an hour a day of math? Students in middle school are there from 8:15-3:00. That is 6 hours and 45 minutes. Why can't math be an hour a day?
What also would be better would be to have actual math textbooks with WORKED EXAMPLES, direct instruction and workbooks like every other country that is highly ranked in math.
Because to offer an hour a day of math in middle school, you would either need to have 6 60-minute periods a day (only 1 elective) or two math periods out of seven 45-ish minute periods a day (only 1 elective) and MCPS has (rightly in my view) decided not to do either.
Anonymous wrote:The continued problem with using other countries as the basis for making changes, is that holistic changes are not made. For example, less standardize testing before HS. Or nationalized K-12 curriculum and teachers training. etc.