Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And this is why Democrats lose

I don't get why Democrats are so enthusiastically supportive of violent men?

Like, I really don't understand it.

It's clearly a disaster politically. The average murder suspect in DC has 11 felonies. All those victims would be alive today if Democrats simply put violent men in prison. But, no.

Where is the win for Democrats here?

I'm guessing it's pure racism. Black people love having violent men in their communities - and Democrats will accommodate that everywhere from their homes in Palisades and Chevy Chase.

Idiots.

1. Why are there so many violent men?

2. Why hasn't throwing people in jail made it so there are less violent men?

3. Do you want to prevent crime or do you want to punish it after it happens, because jail has not actually been shown to be a deterrent.

4. What would it take for you to admit that maybe we need to try something new?

Anonymous wrote:It is because violent repeat offenders are not prosecuted and if they are it us too light of a sentence before they are released from jail.

There needs to be mandatory incarceration of mentally ill who are convicted or crimes it found not mentally competent.

Reed’s criminal record includes nearly 50 prior arrests since 2017, with past convictions for arson, aggravated battery, and assault.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And this is why Democrats lose

I don't get why Democrats are so enthusiastically supportive of violent men?

Like, I really don't understand it.

It's clearly a disaster politically. The average murder suspect in DC has 11 felonies. All those victims would be alive today if Democrats simply put violent men in prison. But, no.

Where is the win for Democrats here?

I'm guessing it's pure racism. Black people love having violent men in their communities - and Democrats will accommodate that everywhere from their homes in Palisades and Chevy Chase.

Idiots.

1. Why are there so many violent men?

2. Why hasn't throwing people in jail made it so there are less violent men?

3. Do you want to prevent crime or do you want to punish it after it happens, because jail has not actually been shown to be a deterrent.

4. What would it take for you to admit that maybe we need to try something new?

Why do you not care about the victims of crimes? Because you live in a wealthy suburb and don’t have to deal with it?

You didn't answer my questions. I live in Baltimore city. And I do care about victims. I think we do a disservice to victims by not solving the actual problem.

Some people can’t be fixed. It’s a hard truth, and they should be separated from polite society after the first violent encounter.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And this is why Democrats lose

I don't get why Democrats are so enthusiastically supportive of violent men?

Like, I really don't understand it.

It's clearly a disaster politically. The average murder suspect in DC has 11 felonies. All those victims would be alive today if Democrats simply put violent men in prison. But, no.

Where is the win for Democrats here?

I'm guessing it's pure racism. Black people love having violent men in their communities - and Democrats will accommodate that everywhere from their homes in Palisades and Chevy Chase.

Idiots.

1. Why are there so many violent men?

2. Why hasn't throwing people in jail made it so there are less violent men?

3. Do you want to prevent crime or do you want to punish it after it happens, because jail has not actually been shown to be a deterrent.

4. What would it take for you to admit that maybe we need to try something new?

Why do you not care about the victims of crimes? Because you live in a wealthy suburb and don’t have to deal with it?

You didn't answer my questions. I live in Baltimore city. And I do care about victims. I think we do a disservice to victims by not solving the actual problem.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It is because violent repeat offenders are not prosecuted and if they are it us too light of a sentence before they are released from jail.

There needs to be mandatory incarceration of mentally ill who are convicted or crimes it found not mentally competent.

Reed’s criminal record includes nearly 50 prior arrests since 2017, with past convictions for arson, aggravated battery, and assault.

THIS. All of it.

Throwing people in jail seems to have done a great job of preventing crime. /s

We have the highest number of incarcerated people in the world and yet still plenty of crime. Throwing people in jail is not working. Maybe fix the actual problems instead of throwing people away.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And this is why Democrats lose

I don't get why Democrats are so enthusiastically supportive of violent men?

Like, I really don't understand it.

It's clearly a disaster politically. The average murder suspect in DC has 11 felonies. All those victims would be alive today if Democrats simply put violent men in prison. But, no.

Where is the win for Democrats here?

I'm guessing it's pure racism. Black people love having violent men in their communities - and Democrats will accommodate that everywhere from their homes in Palisades and Chevy Chase.

Idiots.

1. Why are there so many violent men?

2. Why hasn't throwing people in jail made it so there are less violent men?

3. Do you want to prevent crime or do you want to punish it after it happens, because jail has not actually been shown to be a deterrent.

4. What would it take for you to admit that maybe we need to try something new?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For comparison’s sake, how many people did Trump kill by cutting off USAID food assistance?

Oh, you mean using USAID to fund color revolutions in foreign countries?

No, I mean the hundreds of thousands of deaths from cutting off food to starving people. I’m sorry the foreign actors feeding you garbage on X.com told you it was “color revolutions” or whatever nonsense you imagine. It was actually food. For children. Children who starved to death.

NP. This is a thread about grievous bodily harm inflicted on an American citizen by another American citizen in the United States. Why are you bringing up the theoretical impact of USAID cuts to noncitizens outside of the United States? Go post your grievances in another thread.

Because our "leaders" kill scores more people on a daily basis with their policies, but you are allowing yourself to be whipped into a frenzy over regrettable but isolated instances of violence while ignoring large scale violence committed by the people in charge.

Anonymous wrote:Oh look. Trump has a bad day and suddenly we get to hear another distracting story about a sCaAAary criminal.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And this is why Democrats lose

I don't get why Democrats are so enthusiastically supportive of violent men?

Like, I really don't understand it.

It's clearly a disaster politically. The average murder suspect in DC has 11 felonies. All those victims would be alive today if Democrats simply put violent men in prison. But, no.

Where is the win for Democrats here?

I'm guessing it's pure racism. Black people love having violent men in their communities - and Democrats will accommodate that everywhere from their homes in Palisades and Chevy Chase.

Idiots.

1. Why are there so many violent men?

2. Why hasn't throwing people in jail made it so there are less violent men?

3. Do you want to prevent crime or do you want to punish it after it happens, because jail has not actually been shown to be a deterrent.

4. What would it take for you to admit that maybe we need to try something new?

Why do you not care about the victims of crimes? Because you live in a wealthy suburb and don’t have to deal with it?

You didn't answer my questions. I live in Baltimore city. And I do care about victims. I think we do a disservice to victims by not solving the actual problem.

I think your comment is a disservice that doesn't solve any problem.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And this is why Democrats lose

I don't get why Democrats are so enthusiastically supportive of violent men?

Like, I really don't understand it.

It's clearly a disaster politically. The average murder suspect in DC has 11 felonies. All those victims would be alive today if Democrats simply put violent men in prison. But, no.

Where is the win for Democrats here?

I'm guessing it's pure racism. Black people love having violent men in their communities - and Democrats will accommodate that everywhere from their homes in Palisades and Chevy Chase.

Idiots.

1. Why are there so many violent men?

2. Why hasn't throwing people in jail made it so there are less violent men?

3. Do you want to prevent crime or do you want to punish it after it happens, because jail has not actually been shown to be a deterrent.

4. What would it take for you to admit that maybe we need to try something new?

Why do you not care about the victims of crimes? Because you live in a wealthy suburb and don’t have to deal with it?

You didn't answer my questions. I live in Baltimore city. And I do care about victims. I think we do a disservice to victims by not solving the actual problem.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And this is why Democrats lose

I don't get why Democrats are so enthusiastically supportive of violent men?

Like, I really don't understand it.

It's clearly a disaster politically. The average murder suspect in DC has 11 felonies. All those victims would be alive today if Democrats simply put violent men in prison. But, no.

Where is the win for Democrats here?

I'm guessing it's pure racism. Black people love having violent men in their communities - and Democrats will accommodate that everywhere from their homes in Palisades and Chevy Chase.

Idiots.

1. Why are there so many violent men?

2. Why hasn't throwing people in jail made it so there are less violent men?

3. Do you want to prevent crime or do you want to punish it after it happens, because jail has not actually been shown to be a deterrent.

4. What would it take for you to admit that maybe we need to try something new?

Why do you not care about the victims of crimes? Because you live in a wealthy suburb and don’t have to deal with it?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It is because violent repeat offenders are not prosecuted and if they are it us too light of a sentence before they are released from jail.

There needs to be mandatory incarceration of mentally ill who are convicted or crimes it found not mentally competent.

Reed’s criminal record includes nearly 50 prior arrests since 2017, with past convictions for arson, aggravated battery, and assault.

THIS. All of it.

Throwing people in jail seems to have done a great job of preventing crime. /s

We have the highest number of incarcerated people in the world and yet still plenty of crime. Throwing people in jail is not working. Maybe fix the actual problems instead of throwing people away.

The prosecutors from this guy’s last case begged the judge to hold him in jail. She refused and let him out. If he had been in jail, that young woman would have gotten home from work that day. Instead, she’s in the ICU fighting for her life and has burns over 60% of her body. That is not okay.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And this is why Democrats lose

I don't get why Democrats are so enthusiastically supportive of violent men?

Like, I really don't understand it.

It's clearly a disaster politically. The average murder suspect in DC has 11 felonies. All those victims would be alive today if Democrats simply put violent men in prison. But, no.

Where is the win for Democrats here?

I'm guessing it's pure racism. Black people love having violent men in their communities - and Democrats will accommodate that everywhere from their homes in Palisades and Chevy Chase.

Idiots.

1. Why are there so many violent men?

2. Why hasn't throwing people in jail made it so there are less violent men?

3. Do you want to prevent crime or do you want to punish it after it happens, because jail has not actually been shown to be a deterrent.

4. What would it take for you to admit that maybe we need to try something new?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It is because violent repeat offenders are not prosecuted and if they are it us too light of a sentence before they are released from jail.

There needs to be mandatory incarceration of mentally ill who are convicted or crimes it found not mentally competent.

Reed’s criminal record includes nearly 50 prior arrests since 2017, with past convictions for arson, aggravated battery, and assault.

THIS. All of it.

Throwing people in jail seems to have done a great job of preventing crime. /s

We have the highest number of incarcerated people in the world and yet still plenty of crime. Throwing people in jail is not working. Maybe fix the actual problems instead of throwing people away.