Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:AI can’t replace the law enforcement function, but it is already being utilized to aggregate and analyze data to better focus efforts towards locations that warrant a reallocation of resources. That should benefit the law abiding citizens in areas that the police plus up their efforts. Hopefully technology and its utilization continues to evolve in a way that helps provide greater public safety.

What makes you even think that. Of course it can replace them. One of the best fields to do so and already in the works worldwide in major countries. Is basically becoming a thing in parts of China now.

There is no way. Law enforcement will be one of the last professions standing. I’d love for you to explain how it could happen.

OCP disagrees.

Waiting on a detailed explanation.

Cool. Wait. Eat more donuts.

I knew you were a phony.

We knew you were a cop.

I’m sorry if exposing you hurt your feelings. Most grownups can defend their positions. I thought you might be able to do that. Have a great night.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Broken window policing by a different name. It's racist.

Agree, completely racist.

No human being wants to be a criminal; they are forced into it by the system.

A better approach is to respect people’s dignity and human rights by providing the wrap-around service to which they are entitled.

I don’t disagree on either point. But, at the end of the day, decisions still need to made about where and how to allocate police resources. But what’s the alternative to using data to make those decisions? Using gut feelings and political pressure? Is that better?

The solution is to dismantle and defund the police. We need less so-called "law enforcement," not more.

This.
Americans are sufficiently armed, that police are not needed like in a country where everyone is helpless and disarmed.

So murder is the solution, or just duels at ten paces?

Or don't attack people and start things? Is that hard to understand?

That’s what criminals do. Many are armed.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:AI can’t replace the law enforcement function, but it is already being utilized to aggregate and analyze data to better focus efforts towards locations that warrant a reallocation of resources. That should benefit the law abiding citizens in areas that the police plus up their efforts. Hopefully technology and its utilization continues to evolve in a way that helps provide greater public safety.

What makes you even think that. Of course it can replace them. One of the best fields to do so and already in the works worldwide in major countries. Is basically becoming a thing in parts of China now.

There is no way. Law enforcement will be one of the last professions standing. I’d love for you to explain how it could happen.

OCP disagrees.

Waiting on a detailed explanation.

Cool. Wait. Eat more donuts.

I knew you were a phony.

We knew you were a cop.

Anonymous wrote:AI can’t replace the law enforcement function, but it is already being utilized to aggregate and analyze data to better focus efforts towards locations that warrant a reallocation of resources. That should benefit the law abiding citizens in areas that the police plus up their efforts. Hopefully technology and its utilization continues to evolve in a way that helps provide greater public safety.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Broken window policing by a different name. It's racist.

Agree, completely racist.

No human being wants to be a criminal; they are forced into it by the system.

A better approach is to respect people’s dignity and human rights by providing the wrap-around service to which they are entitled.

I don’t disagree on either point. But, at the end of the day, decisions still need to made about where and how to allocate police resources. But what’s the alternative to using data to make those decisions? Using gut feelings and political pressure? Is that better?

The solution is to dismantle and defund the police. We need less so-called "law enforcement," not more.

This.
Americans are sufficiently armed, that police are not needed like in a country where everyone is helpless and disarmed.

So murder is the solution, or just duels at ten paces?

Or don't attack people and start things? Is that hard to understand?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:AI can’t replace the law enforcement function, but it is already being utilized to aggregate and analyze data to better focus efforts towards locations that warrant a reallocation of resources. That should benefit the law abiding citizens in areas that the police plus up their efforts. Hopefully technology and its utilization continues to evolve in a way that helps provide greater public safety.

What makes you even think that. Of course it can replace them. One of the best fields to do so and already in the works worldwide in major countries. Is basically becoming a thing in parts of China now.

There is no way. Law enforcement will be one of the last professions standing. I’d love for you to explain how it could happen.

OCP disagrees.

Waiting on a detailed explanation.

Cool. Wait. Eat more donuts.

I knew you were a phony.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Broken window policing by a different name. It's racist.

Agree, completely racist.

No human being wants to be a criminal; they are forced into it by the system.

A better approach is to respect people’s dignity and human rights by providing the wrap-around service to which they are entitled.

I don’t disagree on either point. But, at the end of the day, decisions still need to made about where and how to allocate police resources. But what’s the alternative to using data to make those decisions? Using gut feelings and political pressure? Is that better?

The solution is to dismantle and defund the police. We need less so-called "law enforcement," not more.

This.
Americans are sufficiently armed, that police are not needed like in a country where everyone is helpless and disarmed.

So murder is the solution, or just duels at ten paces?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:AI can’t replace the law enforcement function, but it is already being utilized to aggregate and analyze data to better focus efforts towards locations that warrant a reallocation of resources. That should benefit the law abiding citizens in areas that the police plus up their efforts. Hopefully technology and its utilization continues to evolve in a way that helps provide greater public safety.

What makes you even think that. Of course it can replace them. One of the best fields to do so and already in the works worldwide in major countries. Is basically becoming a thing in parts of China now.

There is no way. Law enforcement will be one of the last professions standing. I’d love for you to explain how it could happen.

OCP disagrees.

Waiting on a detailed explanation.

Cool. Wait. Eat more donuts.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Broken window policing by a different name. It's racist.

Agree, completely racist.

No human being wants to be a criminal; they are forced into it by the system.

A better approach is to respect people’s dignity and human rights by providing the wrap-around service to which they are entitled.

I don’t disagree on either point. But, at the end of the day, decisions still need to made about where and how to allocate police resources. But what’s the alternative to using data to make those decisions? Using gut feelings and political pressure? Is that better?

The solution is to dismantle and defund the police. We need less so-called "law enforcement," not more.

This.
Americans are sufficiently armed, that police are not needed like in a country where everyone is helpless and disarmed.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:AI can’t replace the law enforcement function, but it is already being utilized to aggregate and analyze data to better focus efforts towards locations that warrant a reallocation of resources. That should benefit the law abiding citizens in areas that the police plus up their efforts. Hopefully technology and its utilization continues to evolve in a way that helps provide greater public safety.

What makes you even think that. Of course it can replace them. One of the best fields to do so and already in the works worldwide in major countries. Is basically becoming a thing in parts of China now.

There is no way. Law enforcement will be one of the last professions standing. I’d love for you to explain how it could happen.

OCP disagrees.

Waiting on a detailed explanation.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:AI can’t replace the law enforcement function, but it is already being utilized to aggregate and analyze data to better focus efforts towards locations that warrant a reallocation of resources. That should benefit the law abiding citizens in areas that the police plus up their efforts. Hopefully technology and its utilization continues to evolve in a way that helps provide greater public safety.

What makes you even think that. Of course it can replace them. One of the best fields to do so and already in the works worldwide in major countries. Is basically becoming a thing in parts of China now.

There is no way. Law enforcement will be one of the last professions standing. I’d love for you to explain how it could happen.

OCP disagrees.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Broken window policing by a different name. It's racist.

Agree, completely racist.

No human being wants to be a criminal; they are forced into it by the system.

A better approach is to respect people’s dignity and human rights by providing the wrap-around service to which they are entitled.

I don’t disagree on either point. But, at the end of the day, decisions still need to made about where and how to allocate police resources. But what’s the alternative to using data to make those decisions? Using gut feelings and political pressure? Is that better?

The solution is to dismantle and defund the police. We need less so-called "law enforcement," not more.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:AI can’t replace the law enforcement function, but it is already being utilized to aggregate and analyze data to better focus efforts towards locations that warrant a reallocation of resources. That should benefit the law abiding citizens in areas that the police plus up their efforts. Hopefully technology and its utilization continues to evolve in a way that helps provide greater public safety.

What makes you even think that. Of course it can replace them. One of the best fields to do so and already in the works worldwide in major countries. Is basically becoming a thing in parts of China now.

There is no way. Law enforcement will be one of the last professions standing. I’d love for you to explain how it could happen.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Broken window policing by a different name. It's racist.

Agree, completely racist.

No human being wants to be a criminal; they are forced into it by the system.

A better approach is to respect people’s dignity and human rights by providing the wrap-around service to which they are entitled.

Shot Spotter + AI + incident report databases + surveillance cameras all combine to identify target rich areas for law enforcement to surge resources to. It will make citizens safer.

https://opendata.dc.gov/datasets/DCGIS::shot-spotter-gun-shots/explore?location=38.892424%2C-76.991546%2C13.04&showTable=true

ShotSpotter is racist.

It can tell what race the person shooting in the street is?

Take a look at where the devices are located in the city. Notice how few there are in NW (none in Georgetown???) and how many there are in Black neighborhoods.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Broken window policing by a different name. It's racist.

Agree, completely racist.

No human being wants to be a criminal; they are forced into it by the system.

A better approach is to respect people’s dignity and human rights by providing the wrap-around service to which they are entitled.

Shot Spotter + AI + incident report databases + surveillance cameras all combine to identify target rich areas for law enforcement to surge resources to. It will make citizens safer.

https://opendata.dc.gov/datasets/DCGIS::shot-spotter-gun-shots/explore?location=38.892424%2C-76.991546%2C13.04&showTable=true

ShotSpotter is racist.

It can tell what race the person shooting in the street is?

Take a look at where the devices are located in the city. Notice how few there are in NW (none in Georgetown???) and how many there are in Black neighborhoods.