Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is my #1 hesitation about MCPS — the unsafely low teacher to student ratio at lunch and especially during recess — and is the reason we are applying for a rising K student.
It’s such a shame MCPS will not allow us to fundraise for more staff the way DCPS does. The equity concern seems unfounded; parents who can afford it would foot the bill, and all children would benefit from the safer environment!
Sigh…
The equity concern is across schools. If W feeders just pay for paras from parent donations, those parents won’t convince MCPS to properly staff all schools.
Yes recess is chaotic. But it’s good for kids. Unsupervised play time raises test scores and lowers anxiety among kids. Significant problems are rare.
So if everybody doesn't get what they need nobody can have it? The foundations are already disproportionate and surge resources, I believe the Whitman Music program raised 25k from parents this year to support various efforts in the cluster, I doubt that most HS do that for their feeders. Outlawing washing because of the presence of unwashed doesn't fix the stink
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is my #1 hesitation about MCPS — the unsafely low teacher to student ratio at lunch and especially during recess — and is the reason we are applying for a rising K student.
It’s such a shame MCPS will not allow us to fundraise for more staff the way DCPS does. The equity concern seems unfounded; parents who can afford it would foot the bill, and all children would benefit from the safer environment!
Sigh…
The equity concern is across schools. If W feeders just pay for paras from parent donations, those parents won’t convince MCPS to properly staff all schools.
Yes recess is chaotic. But it’s good for kids. Unsupervised play time raises test scores and lowers anxiety among kids. Significant problems are rare.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is my #1 hesitation about MCPS — the unsafely low teacher to student ratio at lunch and especially during recess — and is the reason we are applying for a rising K student.
It’s such a shame MCPS will not allow us to fundraise for more staff the way DCPS does. The equity concern seems unfounded; parents who can afford it would foot the bill, and all children would benefit from the safer environment!
Sigh…
The equity concern is because you are essentially creating privately funded schools in a public school system. Then the rich schools sit pretty and nobody wants to fund more staffing for the low income schools. "My school is great so why do you need to raise my taxes?"
MCPS should not be trying to become more like DCPS.
Anonymous wrote:This is my #1 hesitation about MCPS — the unsafely low teacher to student ratio at lunch and especially during recess — and is the reason we are applying for a rising K student.
It’s such a shame MCPS will not allow us to fundraise for more staff the way DCPS does. The equity concern seems unfounded; parents who can afford it would foot the bill, and all children would benefit from the safer environment!
Sigh…
Anonymous wrote:This is my #1 hesitation about MCPS — the unsafely low teacher to student ratio at lunch and especially during recess — and is the reason we are applying for a rising K student.
It’s such a shame MCPS will not allow us to fundraise for more staff the way DCPS does. The equity concern seems unfounded; parents who can afford it would foot the bill, and all children would benefit from the safer environment!
Sigh…