Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Euclid middle school should be successful if people at the feeders are willing to give it a try.
Do you think it is still needed? All signs seem to point to the DC population shrinking. And Francis seems to have the capacity right now for Ross, Thompson, Seaton, Garrion, Cleveland.
Anonymous wrote:Euclid middle school should be successful if people at the feeders are willing to give it a try.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you can’t/won’t move or get a car, don’t go WOTP for ES. You will no longer have the lovely lifestyle you have now. Your kids will be on unreliable public transport during rush hour every day and that’s a big family stressor.
I don't find the metro (how our middle schooler commutes) to be unreliable. Though we are a "car-light" family and use it to get to activities that aren't convenient on transit.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For kids in 3rd grade and below, there will be a new middle school by the time they’re in 6th: Euclid in Shaw (feeders: Garrison, Seaton, and Cleveland). How many would consider it?
Where in Shaw? I thought it was going to be in the old Banneker building.
Pretty sure the old Banneker building neighborhood is in Shaw, so both things are accurate
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For kids in 3rd grade and below, there will be a new middle school by the time they’re in 6th: Euclid in Shaw (feeders: Garrison, Seaton, and Cleveland). How many would consider it?
Where in Shaw? I thought it was going to be in the old Banneker building.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For kids in 3rd grade and below, there will be a new middle school by the time they’re in 6th: Euclid in Shaw (feeders: Garrison, Seaton, and Cleveland). How many would consider it?
Where in Shaw? I thought it was going to be in the old Banneker building.
Anonymous wrote:For kids in 3rd grade and below, there will be a new middle school by the time they’re in 6th: Euclid in Shaw (feeders: Garrison, Seaton, and Cleveland). How many would consider it?
Anonymous wrote:If you can’t/won’t move or get a car, don’t go WOTP for ES. You will no longer have the lovely lifestyle you have now. Your kids will be on unreliable public transport during rush hour every day and that’s a big family stressor.
Anonymous wrote:Awesome that you are car-free! Our family, now with a late-elementary student and a middle school student, is as well. The best part is the independence they have as they start taking themselves to activities on the transit they are so accustomed to.
We personally lived in a central-ish spot, went to our not really popular in-bound elementary (that we loved), moved aboard, and when we moved back, we moved into an apartment west of the park. It gave us a foot into the lottery, but we ended up loving the neighborhood, so we are going to stay. I wouldn’t be too worried about moving schools later socially, as people in DC are constantly switching schools for moves or lotteries.
Being car-free is such an amazing positive, but you do have to plan your life carefully (as you know!). I’d start local and then fret about middle school as it gets closer. There are more good options these days as other posters have mentioned.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I personally would not drive far across town starting in first grade just for feeder rights to Hardy or Deal.
We’ve done this with all three kids, no biggie when it comes to education. Granted it was only a 20 minute drive which was doable.
yeah, and MANY families do it for private school (proportionally few kids coming from walking distance). I taught at one and kids were commuting for an hour each way, and it was quite rare to be closer than 15 minutes. No doubt it was worth it to the families. This is just a choice families have to make.