Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:From several threads this week, it seems GPA is more important than rigor at ivy league schools. Below a certain gpa, ivy league schools become impossible no matter the rigor.
Outside ivy leagues, is there any t20 school that is more willing to take a high rigor (multi variable and a bunch of other high level science courses) but rank outside top 10% ( but still top 20, 30%, etc). What if they have 1580-1600 scores to validate?
Or do you think this type should focus on state flagships instead?
Not at all true from our private or the neighboring private where we have access to SCOIR and know many kids and families. Ivies want both top rigor and top GPA unhooked, usually top3-5% especially if it is RD, minimally top10% plus all have to have very top rigor if unhooked. Hooked kids do not need top rigor for ivies, nor top rank. It is a different game for hooked kids. The only ivy that takes unhooked outside top10% rank is Cornell and those kids all have top rigor in all areas if they get in with a below 10% GPA. They also have been males.
+1. This. I have no idea where OP gets the idea that GPA is more important. It is very clear that top GPA, top test score, Max rigor, great ECs and great LOR are what you need for Ivies and top SLACs. Even at UVA (26), you need a 4.5 GPA, 35 ACT, and SAT 1510 at the 75th percentile to get in, and UVA is very clear they want to see maximum rigor.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:From several threads this week, it seems GPA is more important than rigor at ivy league schools. Below a certain gpa, ivy league schools become impossible no matter the rigor.
Outside ivy leagues, is there any t20 school that is more willing to take a high rigor (multi variable and a bunch of other high level science courses) but rank outside top 10% ( but still top 20, 30%, etc). What if they have 1580-1600 scores to validate?
Or do you think this type should focus on state flagships instead?
Haven't read all the responses, but is this post a joke?
ALL the T20 expect top rigor AND top grades. Without it, only a student with an amazing hook has a chance of being accepted.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:From several threads this week, it seems GPA is more important than rigor at ivy league schools. Below a certain gpa, ivy league schools become impossible no matter the rigor.
Outside ivy leagues, is there any t20 school that is more willing to take a high rigor (multi variable and a bunch of other high level science courses) but rank outside top 10% ( but still top 20, 30%, etc). What if they have 1580-1600 scores to validate?
Or do you think this type should focus on state flagships instead?
From our private, Duke values rigor more than GPA, for unhooked kids, as does Hopkins, Rice, WashU, for non-ivies. WashU and Rice take slightly lower GPA than Duke and Hopkins, as in lower second decile, barely in top 20%, vs just outside T10%. This is from a private school where that GPA is still well within the UVA -EA/RD acceptance range. UVA dips well into the 3rd decile for EA/RD as long as top rigor, UVA-ED sometimes goes to 4th decile for top rigor.
IF you are in-state UVA, your kid's GPA needs to be within the green-check area of Naviance for UVA to have a shot at T20, even with top rigor.
Similar at our private. Duke, Hopkins, Rice, WashU look beyond numbers. Multivariable is very rare at our school. Most ivy admits are humanities major, take either Calculus AB or precalculus.
Anonymous wrote:From several threads this week, it seems GPA is more important than rigor at ivy league schools. Below a certain gpa, ivy league schools become impossible no matter the rigor.
Outside ivy leagues, is there any t20 school that is more willing to take a high rigor (multi variable and a bunch of other high level science courses) but rank outside top 10% ( but still top 20, 30%, etc). What if they have 1580-1600 scores to validate?
Or do you think this type should focus on state flagships instead?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think they are willing if upward trend and high rigor, especially for younger boys with high test scores in all areas.
Younger boys? What does that mean?
non-redshirted that may have been very young freshman year.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:From several threads this week, it seems GPA is more important than rigor at ivy league schools. Below a certain gpa, ivy league schools become impossible no matter the rigor.
Outside ivy leagues, is there any t20 school that is more willing to take a high rigor (multi variable and a bunch of other high level science courses) but rank outside top 10% ( but still top 20, 30%, etc). What if they have 1580-1600 scores to validate?
Or do you think this type should focus on state flagships instead?
From our private, Duke values rigor more than GPA, for unhooked kids, as does Hopkins, Rice, WashU, for non-ivies. WashU and Rice take slightly lower GPA than Duke and Hopkins, as in lower second decile, barely in top 20%, vs just outside T10%. This is from a private school where that GPA is still well within the UVA -EA/RD acceptance range. UVA dips well into the 3rd decile for EA/RD as long as top rigor, UVA-ED sometimes goes to 4th decile for top rigor.
IF you are in-state UVA, your kid's GPA needs to be within the green-check area of Naviance for UVA to have a shot at T20, even with top rigor.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:From several threads this week, it seems GPA is more important than rigor at ivy league schools. Below a certain gpa, ivy league schools become impossible no matter the rigor.
Outside ivy leagues, is there any t20 school that is more willing to take a high rigor (multi variable and a bunch of other high level science courses) but rank outside top 10% ( but still top 20, 30%, etc). What if they have 1580-1600 scores to validate?
Or do you think this type should focus on state flagships instead?
State flagships: UIUC, Georgia tech, Purdue
Tech schools: Stevens institute of technology, RIT, etc
LACs: Carleton, Grinnell
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:From several threads this week, it seems GPA is more important than rigor at ivy league schools. Below a certain gpa, ivy league schools become impossible no matter the rigor.
Outside ivy leagues, is there any t20 school that is more willing to take a high rigor (multi variable and a bunch of other high level science courses) but rank outside top 10% ( but still top 20, 30%, etc). What if they have 1580-1600 scores to validate?
Or do you think this type should focus on state flagships instead?
Not at all true from our private or the neighboring private where we have access to SCOIR and know many kids and families. Ivies want both top rigor and top GPA unhooked, usually top3-5% especially if it is RD, minimally top10% plus all have to have very top rigor if unhooked. Hooked kids do not need top rigor for ivies, nor top rank. It is a different game for hooked kids. The only ivy that takes unhooked outside top10% rank is Cornell and those kids all have top rigor in all areas if they get in with a below 10% GPA. They also have been males.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think they are willing if upward trend and high rigor, especially for younger boys with high test scores in all areas.
Younger boys? What does that mean?
non-redshirted that may have been very young freshman year.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think they are willing if upward trend and high rigor, especially for younger boys with high test scores in all areas.
Younger boys? What does that mean?
Anonymous wrote:I think they are willing if upward trend and high rigor, especially for younger boys with high test scores in all areas.
Anonymous wrote:From several threads this week, it seems GPA is more important than rigor at ivy league schools. Below a certain gpa, ivy league schools become impossible no matter the rigor.
Outside ivy leagues, is there any t20 school that is more willing to take a high rigor (multi variable and a bunch of other high level science courses) but rank outside top 10% ( but still top 20, 30%, etc). What if they have 1580-1600 scores to validate?
Or do you think this type should focus on state flagships instead?
Anonymous wrote:T20 and other top schools are not fooled by applicants who avoided more challenging classes like Calc BC and Physics. This also applies to applicants without an AP English class.