Anonymous wrote:They also pretended to the families that girls were missing when they knew they had died, the filings allege.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The thing that gets me is this: most; if not all, of the girls who were lost had mothers and other relatives who went there before. They knew the setup. Why would you alllow your child to live in a structure well within flooding range? It’s just so dumb.
I went to Camp Mystic and had I had a daughter, would have sent her. The camp had been in operation 99 years and nothing bad has ever happened. There was never any flooding while I was there and it’s safe to say these parents assumed their daughters would have the same experience they had. This tragedy was unimaginable. I do hold the camp owners responsible since they did have knowledge the cabins were in a flood plain and rather than moving the cabins uphill, they worked to have this area excluded. I also don’t think there were proper safety measures in place. I suspect the victims will prevail in their lawsuits and I hope this gives their families some peace.
Anonymous wrote:The thing that gets me is this: most; if not all, of the girls who were lost had mothers and other relatives who went there before. They knew the setup. Why would you alllow your child to live in a structure well within flooding range? It’s just so dumb.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The thing that gets me is this: most; if not all, of the girls who were lost had mothers and other relatives who went there before. They knew the setup. Why would you alllow your child to live in a structure well within flooding range? It’s just so dumb.
Have you never taken your family to a beach house, a lake house, a river house? There are entire neighborhoods and even cities in flood plains, all across the country.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Didn't read or click link. They plan to open camp again next summer?
It’s the same camp, but a different campus. They are not reopening the camp location that flooded. I think it’s still distasteful to reopen.
That's silly. Obviously don't rebuild in the lower floodplain, but it is otherwise a good location for a camp.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So many parents dont investigate. They just assume someone is taking care of that stuff, even more so with rich people.
I’ll admit I’m guilty of this. DD spent a good chunk of her summers from ages 10-18 at a camp that I never saw much beyond the pickup/dropoff point, which looked lovely and very safe. Last year, she finally took us on a tour of the entire camp and I was shocked at how isolated and remote some of the areas were. I do think that they had excellent emergency plans in place, but I could also see how things could get dangerous really fast.
I mean, it was a camp for rich/upper middle class girls that has been around for generations. A lot of us go off of word of mouth recs from other parents rather than analyzing camp maps and flood risk data.
But yes the camp deserves to be sued. The wife of the camp owner who died had to be helicoptered out one year because of flood waters. They certainly knew how dangerous the situation was.
The husband knew enough to petition the state to have the doomed cabins removed from the flood plain so that he would be allowed to let girls sleep there.
They petitioned FEMA, likely hoping to reduce their flood insurance costs. And FEMA agreed with them. That seems to refute the claim they knew this was a plausible risk.
I grew up in the upper midwest with floods, but those were far slower floods than flash floods like this incident. It is mind-boggling to me how quickly this flood progressed-- the river rose 26 feet in 45 minutes!
Yes, the area was known for flash flooding, but every aspect of this was a worst-case scenario. This was the highest recorded flood level. It rose extraordinarily fast, even for this area. It happened over a holiday weekend, with less support/warning from local emergency services. And it occurred overnight, likely delaying their understanding of how bad the flood was getting and impairing evacuations.
I do think it was negligent to have cabins with kids that close to the river. And I think the camp should have been more careful with monitoring the situation and calling for evacuations. But it also seems like this was both a truly exceptional event and a situation where emergency services should have more infrastructure in place in detect and warn of major floods as they occur.
Anonymous wrote:The thing that gets me is this: most; if not all, of the girls who were lost had mothers and other relatives who went there before. They knew the setup. Why would you alllow your child to live in a structure well within flooding range? It’s just so dumb.
Anonymous wrote:The thing that gets me is this: most; if not all, of the girls who were lost had mothers and other relatives who went there before. They knew the setup. Why would you alllow your child to live in a structure well within flooding range? It’s just so dumb.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Didn't read or click link. They plan to open camp again next summer?
It’s the same camp, but a different campus. They are not reopening the camp location that flooded. I think it’s still distasteful to reopen.
Anonymous wrote:Didn't read or click link. They plan to open camp again next summer?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So many parents dont investigate. They just assume someone is taking care of that stuff, even more so with rich people.
I’ll admit I’m guilty of this. DD spent a good chunk of her summers from ages 10-18 at a camp that I never saw much beyond the pickup/dropoff point, which looked lovely and very safe. Last year, she finally took us on a tour of the entire camp and I was shocked at how isolated and remote some of the areas were. I do think that they had excellent emergency plans in place, but I could also see how things could get dangerous really fast.
I mean, it was a camp for rich/upper middle class girls that has been around for generations. A lot of us go off of word of mouth recs from other parents rather than analyzing camp maps and flood risk data.
But yes the camp deserves to be sued. The wife of the camp owner who died had to be helicoptered out one year because of flood waters. They certainly knew how dangerous the situation was.
The husband knew enough to petition the state to have the doomed cabins removed from the flood plain so that he would be allowed to let girls sleep there.
Anonymous wrote:Just curious....I noticed when it happened that the camp did not belong to the American Camp Association. Nor is it on the Newsweek list of America's 500 Best Summer Camps.
Do accreditations like these mean anything? I'm especially interested in ACA accreditation. Does the fact a camp belongs to the ACA any protection?