Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So what? She has been in SO MANY movies recently, this one bad one is just going to blur into the background.

She may look weird, but she is an excellent actress

Yes she's not going anywhere. Even bad press is good. Even good movies flop at the theaters and bad movies do great.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Even if she hadn’t said anything about being MAGA, who would go see this movie? She might be a great actress but the only things she’s in always show her scantily clad at best. No one goes to see Sydney Sweeney act. This was a terrible casting choice from the jump.

+1

But I’ll go a step further: even with a different actress as the lead, this film was never going to be a commercial success.

The story just doesn’t interest most people. The trailer doesn’t interest most people.

I know Ruby Rose went off on Sweeney for ruining the film, but gimme a break…this film was never destined to be a big hit.

If you are Gen X, you realize this story lends itself to an old school movie of the week or lifetime movie: something free to watch if you are even just casually interested.

PS - I hope we can get back to a place where we don’t even know an actor’s politics.

I agree that it wasn't destined to be a big hit, but I still think this was a miscasting. Ruby Rose playing Christy could have created a bit of a cult LGBTQ angle, at least. Sydney Sweeney is a bubbly big chested sexbot; giving her a chance at Oscar bait in a role that does not in any way play to her strengths felt more like a favor to her or her agent
than a chance to boost the film.

Ruby Rose was never up for the role of Christy. She was attached to the film in the role of Cherry a while ago before Sweeney got involved. Anyway, seems like sour grapes.

You think she’s jealous she didn’t get to play a role in one of the worst box office performances in history?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Even if she hadn’t said anything about being MAGA, who would go see this movie? She might be a great actress but the only things she’s in always show her scantily clad at best. No one goes to see Sydney Sweeney act. This was a terrible casting choice from the jump.

+1

But I’ll go a step further: even with a different actress as the lead, this film was never going to be a commercial success.

The story just doesn’t interest most people. The trailer doesn’t interest most people.

I know Ruby Rose went off on Sweeney for ruining the film, but gimme a break…this film was never destined to be a big hit.

If you are Gen X, you realize this story lends itself to an old school movie of the week or lifetime movie: something free to watch if you are even just casually interested.

PS - I hope we can get back to a place where we don’t even know an actor’s politics.

I agree that it wasn't destined to be a big hit, but I still think this was a miscasting. Ruby Rose playing Christy could have created a bit of a cult LGBTQ angle, at least. Sydney Sweeney is a bubbly big chested sexbot; giving her a chance at Oscar bait in a role that does not in any way play to her strengths felt more like a favor to her or her agent
than a chance to boost the film.

Ruby Rose was never up for the role of Christy. She was attached to the film in the role of Cherry a while ago before Sweeney got involved. Anyway, seems like sour grapes.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Even if she hadn’t said anything about being MAGA, who would go see this movie? She might be a great actress but the only things she’s in always show her scantily clad at best. No one goes to see Sydney Sweeney act. This was a terrible casting choice from the jump.

+1

But I’ll go a step further: even with a different actress as the lead, this film was never going to be a commercial success.

The story just doesn’t interest most people. The trailer doesn’t interest most people.

I know Ruby Rose went off on Sweeney for ruining the film, but gimme a break…this film was never destined to be a big hit.

If you are Gen X, you realize this story lends itself to an old school movie of the week or lifetime movie: something free to watch if you are even just casually interested.

PS - I hope we can get back to a place where we don’t even know an actor’s politics.

I agree that it wasn't destined to be a big hit, but I still think this was a miscasting. Ruby Rose playing Christy could have created a bit of a cult LGBTQ angle, at least. Sydney Sweeney is a bubbly big chested sexbot; giving her a chance at Oscar bait in a role that does not in any way play to her strengths felt more like a favor to her or her agent
than a chance to boost the film.

Anonymous wrote:lol

Let’s look at how this movie aligns with maga- lesbian, female boxer who faces domestic violence.

Lesbian- maga hates lesbians
Female boxer - maga hates female in sports
Lesbian woman leaves clueless husband- too close to home for maga
Domestic violence- maga support this
No white supremacist - maga no like.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christy_(2025_American_film)

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Even if she hadn’t said anything about being MAGA, who would go see this movie? She might be a great actress but the only things she’s in always show her scantily clad at best. No one goes to see Sydney Sweeney act. This was a terrible casting choice from the jump.

+1

But I’ll go a step further: even with a different actress as the lead, this film was never going to be a commercial success.

The story just doesn’t interest most people. The trailer doesn’t interest most people.

I know Ruby Rose went off on Sweeney for ruining the film, but gimme a break…this film was never destined to be a big hit.

If you are Gen X, you realize this story lends itself to an old school movie of the week or lifetime movie: something free to watch if you are even just casually interested.

PS - I hope we can get back to a place where we don’t even know an actor’s politics.

Anonymous wrote:Even if she hadn’t said anything about being MAGA, who would go see this movie? She might be a great actress but the only things she’s in always show her scantily clad at best. No one goes to see Sydney Sweeney act. This was a terrible casting choice from the jump.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Unfortunately her "base" isn't going to support anything where she doesn't look hot, and she alienated a lot of other people soo...

I feel bad for the actual Christy; finally her story gets a big name and then bombs.

This. She courted controversy and a right wing base of support in a strange way (that may lead to more money for her in the long run, who knows) given that this project was coming out this year. MAGA doesn't care about female athletes outside of as a reason to hate on trans people; they were never going to show up for a movie about a lesbian boxer who doesn't present as femme.

If she was going to do the "why do lefties have to hate me for being pretty and blonde" Fox circuit, it should have been before the opening of Madame Web to give her new fans something to jump on and support. A MAGA superheroine!

Anonymous wrote:Unfortunately her "base" isn't going to support anything where she doesn't look hot, and she alienated a lot of other people soo...

I feel bad for the actual Christy; finally her story gets a big name and then bombs.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Has anyone seen it?
Christy is such a bad title too

I was hoping it was about Christy, the young woman who goes to teach in Cutter Gap TN in 1912. I loved that book.

Anonymous wrote:lol

Let’s look at how this movie aligns with maga- lesbian, female boxer who faces domestic violence.

Lesbian- maga hates lesbians
Female boxer - maga hates female in sports
Lesbian woman leaves clueless husband- too close to home for maga
Domestic violence- maga support this
No white supremacist - maga no like.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christy_(2025_American_film)