Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As a full pay family, this just makes me feel like a schmuck. Which is part of why we choose in-state publics even though we could easily cash flow private. I don’t want to pay double for something so that half the kids pay nothing.
Agree. We are only recently in the full pay category and I’ve been surprised at the percentage of no-pay. $400k per kid is still a hugely significant number for most people. As a first generation student, I support some assistance. The difference in pay just seems so vast relative to income considerations, especially in the barely-qualifying incomes.
Anonymous wrote:As a full pay family, this just makes me feel like a schmuck. Which is part of why we choose in-state publics even though we could easily cash flow private. I don’t want to pay double for something so that half the kids pay nothing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Key point, "tuition" doesn't include room and board.
Costs have gone up and so must need-based financial aid. People should be using Harvard's Net Price Calculator to see what it would cost them; this is nothing new. These types of articles are just advertising for the school.
Agree that it's advertising for the school and given its recent press I don't blame them. (BTW, the article does mention that 23% have tuition and R+B covered.) It does beg the question how do other top 20 schools stack up in providing full tuition and full tuition + room/board.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Key point, "tuition" doesn't include room and board.
Costs have gone up and so must need-based financial aid. People should be using Harvard's Net Price Calculator to see what it would cost them; this is nothing new. These types of articles are just advertising for the school.
http://begthequestion.info
Agree that it's advertising for the school and given its recent press I don't blame them. (BTW, the article does mention that 23% have tuition and R+B covered.) It does beg the question how do other top 20 schools stack up in providing full tuition and full tuition + room/board.
Anonymous wrote:As a full pay family, this just makes me feel like a schmuck. Which is part of why we choose in-state publics even though we could easily cash flow private. I don’t want to pay double for something so that half the kids pay nothing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As a full pay family, this just makes me feel like a schmuck. Which is part of why we choose in-state publics even though we could easily cash flow private. I don’t want to pay double for something so that half the kids pay nothing.
Agree. We are only recently in the full pay category and I’ve been surprised at the percentage of no-pay. $400k per kid is still a hugely significant number for most people. As a first generation student, I support some assistance. The difference in pay just seems so vast relative to income considerations, especially in the barely-qualifying incomes.
Anonymous wrote:Aren't white students minorities in all the Ivy league and top 10 schools now? That's why you are seeing a cultural shift towards other schools. Many students don't want to be a minority regardless of race. The social dynamic isn't very good and instead of mixing, many students of the same ethnicity only socialize with those of their own background. Not sure what can be done but admissions is doing a terrible job.
Anonymous wrote:Racial and SES divisions - a gift from WASP Americans.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Good luck to Harvard. Probably won’t be many sell outs for future H-Y football games.
Harvard is 8 - 0! Ticket sales will only increase.
Anonymous wrote:Good luck to Harvard. Probably won’t be many sell outs for future H-Y football games.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Only 37% white is deeply concerning. Someone needs to check their admissions practices.
? I don't understand your point. Princeton's class is 28% white for comparison.
Who said this was a good thing?