Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It would be illegal for them to fund SNAP.
It’s also illegal for stores to incentivize one customer base over another.
How is it illegal for stores to incentivize one customer base over another if they aren't discriminating against protected classes?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It would be illegal for them to fund SNAP.
It’s also illegal for stores to incentivize one customer base over another.
We all know Democrats don’t care about legalities.
Anonymous wrote:The cruelty is the point with these monsters.
Despite illegally refusing to fund SNAP, the Trump administration is doing "essential" work preventing business from offering their own SNAP replacement.
https://www.fns.usda.gov/snap/fr-022124
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The cruelty is the point with these monsters.
Despite illegally refusing to fund SNAP, the Trump administration is doing "essential" work preventing business from offering their own SNAP replacement.
https://www.fns.usda.gov/snap/fr-022124
The info at the link above was published in February 2024 seeking comments on a proposed streamlined waiver process that would make it easier for retailers to provide SNAP incentives to choose healthier foods.
They are absolutely cruel monsters, but the conclusion you drew from reading the first paragraph at that link was wrong and you used it to spin everyone up. Lying and misleading doesn’t help at all.
Sorry, The Hill didn't cite its source properly.
The 2024 policy document is from when SNAP was funded.
Here's a article with an image of Trump USDA's notice from this week, enforcing the rule for SNAP "beneficiaries", while ILLEGALLY NOT PAYING BENEFITS.
https://newrepublic.com/post/202604/usda-threatens-grocery-stores-discounts-people-food-stamps
Anonymous wrote:I'm pretty sure that if they are not paying with SNAP benefits, because they are not currently receiving them, they are the same as any paying customer. The SNAP equality law does not apply. The store can give a discount. The store can even donate free food to a food pantry that supplies people who happen to not be receiving benefits right now and need food.
"Coupons shall be accepted for eligible foods at the same prices and on the same terms and conditions applicable to cash purchases of the same foods at the same store ...."
The stores are not accepting coupons because the individual does not have any, so this does not apply.
Anonymous wrote:It would be illegal for them to fund SNAP.
It’s also illegal for stores to incentivize one customer base over another.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The cruelty is the point with these monsters.
Despite illegally refusing to fund SNAP, the Trump administration is doing "essential" work preventing business from offering their own SNAP replacement.
https://www.fns.usda.gov/snap/fr-022124
The info at the link above was published in February 2024 seeking comments on a proposed streamlined waiver process that would make it easier for retailers to provide SNAP incentives to choose healthier foods.
They are absolutely cruel monsters, but the conclusion you drew from reading the first paragraph at that link was wrong and you used it to spin everyone up. Lying and misleading doesn’t help at all.
Anonymous wrote:It would be illegal for them to fund SNAP.
It’s also illegal for stores to incentivize one customer base over another.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It would be illegal for them to fund SNAP.
It’s also illegal for stores to incentivize one customer base over another.
This is dumb, even for maga.
Say goodbye to your senior discounts and free coffee for cops!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The cruelty is the point with these monsters.
Despite illegally refusing to fund SNAP, the Trump administration is doing "essential" work preventing business from offering their own SNAP replacement.
https://www.fns.usda.gov/snap/fr-022124
The info at the link above was published in February 2024 seeking comments on a proposed streamlined waiver process that would make it easier for retailers to provide SNAP incentives to choose healthier foods.
They are absolutely cruel monsters, but the conclusion you drew from reading the first paragraph at that link was wrong and you used it to spin everyone up. Lying and misleading doesn’t help at all.
How is the GOP cruel if the Biden admin is the one that put out this notice?
The GOP is cruel because they are cutting SNAP benefits despite having procedures in place to continue paying benefits during a shutdown. Are you not paying attention?