Anonymous wrote:Well, yes. Law. But it’s so odd. No one else I know in the business world really does this. They’d list their accomplishments, work focus. They wouldn’t devote equal space to undergrad school and major, and law school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why? Clients care or no one would do it. Even a partner 25 years out. Corporate clients want to see a resume they expect. They could be open to alternatives but most want central casting. It explains who they are getting.
I am a corporate client. I do not care where my OC went to college and what they majored in. And I don’t care about their law school either. I care that they have deep SME
That’s because OC is what in house attorneys say internally. I’m new on in house side.
Please learn to write without the use of silly acronyms.
I’m an OC. I have never heard the acronym OC. (Outside counsel).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why? Clients care or no one would do it. Even a partner 25 years out. Corporate clients want to see a resume they expect. They could be open to alternatives but most want central casting. It explains who they are getting.
I am a corporate client. I do not care where my OC went to college and what they majored in. And I don’t care about their law school either. I care that they have deep SME
Please learn to write without the use of silly acronyms.
I’m an OC. I have never heard the acronym OC. (Outside counsel).
Anonymous wrote:Anyone who knows anything about hiring qualified counsel understands that professional reputation absolutely trumps school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why? Clients care or no one would do it. Even a partner 25 years out. Corporate clients want to see a resume they expect. They could be open to alternatives but most want central casting. It explains who they are getting.
I am a corporate client. I do not care where my OC went to college and what they majored in. And I don’t care about their law school either. I care that they have deep SME
Anonymous wrote:Yeah but if someone from T20 law school has a BA in English from T10 and someone else has an SB in physics from T10 guess who I pick all else being equal.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why? Clients care or no one would do it. Even a partner 25 years out. Corporate clients want to see a resume they expect. They could be open to alternatives but most want central casting. It explains who they are getting.
I am a corporate client. I do not care where my OC went to college and what they majored in. And I don’t care about their law school either. I care that they have deep SME
Please learn to write without the use of silly acronyms.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What is this little group that is getting together? That’s the issue.
Lawyers. All very senior. It just struck me bc I recently had to do a bio exchange for an industry event with non lawyers. Everyone highlighted their actual work.
I’d understand if it was a recent grad event.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why? Clients care or no one would do it. Even a partner 25 years out. Corporate clients want to see a resume they expect. They could be open to alternatives but most want central casting. It explains who they are getting.
I am a corporate client. I do not care where my OC went to college and what they majored in. And I don’t care about their law school either. I care that they have deep SME
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's standard in the field -- not sure why you don't understand this. The biggest context for bios is website copy written for clients. Clients want to see where the lawyers went to law school. Legal culture in general follows -- bios for CLE presenters, etc.
Doctors and dentists do this as well -- people look at that info when choosing a provider.
That you "find it embarrassing" is definitely about you, and not about the phenomenon.
Just because it is standard doesn’t make it any less dumb.
I really have no idea where my dentist went to school. Or my doctors.