Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How come no one has mentioned that swarthmore is $400m in debt before? That’s substantial!
but they have an almost 3 billion endowment. debt isn't always bad. these colleges dont pay cash for new construction projects.
think there may be more nuance here.
also, they're out of trump's crosshairs. Chicago is not
Agreed. The numbers sound big and misleading; issuing bonds is not a sign of financial instability—on the contrary, the ability to borrow at a low rate over a long period is evidence of confidence in the institution.
The thing that caught my eye, as someone who works at a peer institution, is Chicago’s running an operating budget deficit for 14 years straight. That’s a HUGE red flag for financial mismanagement and presumably is why they have to takedraconian action now. My institution ran a deficit once in the last decade and took significant action the following year to ensure it did not happen again.
Anonymous wrote:Endowment funds half of Swarthmore budget. https://www.inquirer.com/education/swarthmore-college-three-month-budget-20250523.html
Anonymous wrote:Endowment funds half of Swarthmore budget. https://www.inquirer.com/education/swarthmore-college-three-month-budget-20250523.html
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Most of these so called elite schools were run by academics with little or no financial acumen. Bloated administrative staff, high salaries and building sprees arm race.
This is probably the best assessment
I am not so sure. Two of my former bosses at State's Office of Foreign Assistance Resources are now head CFO/VP of Finance at Swarthmore and Georgetown. They also were at OMB. Hardly financial novices. Both are well respected.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Most of these so called elite schools were run by academics with little or no financial acumen. Bloated administrative staff, high salaries and building sprees arm race.
This is probably the best assessment
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How come no one has mentioned that swarthmore is $400m in debt before? That’s substantial!
but they have an almost 3 billion endowment. debt isn't always bad. these colleges dont pay cash for new construction projects.
think there may be more nuance here.
also, they're out of trump's crosshairs. Chicago is not
Agreed. The numbers sound big and misleading; issuing bonds is not a sign of financial instability—on the contrary, the ability to borrow at a low rate over a long period is evidence of confidence in the institution.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How come no one has mentioned that swarthmore is $400m in debt before? That’s substantial!
but they have an almost 3 billion endowment. debt isn't always bad. these colleges dont pay cash for new construction projects.
think there may be more nuance here.
also, they're out of trump's crosshairs. Chicago is not
Anonymous wrote:UChicago, NYU, USC and Swarthmore mentioned in this article.
Any others to be worried about?
Anonymous wrote:UChicago, NYU, USC and Swarthmore mentioned in this article.
Any others to be worried about?
Anonymous wrote:Most of these so called elite schools were run by academics with little or no financial acumen. Bloated administrative staff, high salaries and building sprees arm race.