Anonymous wrote:Can Jeff please delete and we can start a new thread with an accurate name?

The title of this thread reflects poorly on dcum

Thought of starting a new one. But he will just delete or lock the new one with a link to this thread. So.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:CU Boulder is fine, but I think it depends on your child and his or her major. My DD didn’t love it — she found the girls to be too rich and catty — but she got a decent education. She felt like the diversity was less than it is on the East coast, which she missed. Boys might have a different time. Engineering school is excellent. Off campus housing is very expensive. The dining halls suck. It’s hard to get around if you don’t live close to campus or have a car because the buses don’t go late (she spends a lot on Ubers).

I don’t know anyone looking to Colorado for diversity.

This all sounds like someone who didn’t do research. Boulder is a hot place for young people => expensive => expensive housing => rich people.

It was more of a realization that diversity mattered.

That happened to me at Penn State main campus. And I'm a suburban white person.

I went to Penn state as a minority.

Penn state isn’t “not diverse”

The issue is that is very townie when I went.

I assume that has changed now though. 45% are oos (though the oos mix is not as balanced as Michigan)

Cu is way less diverse than psu, racially and ses wise

Anonymous wrote:Can Jeff please delete and we can start a new thread with an accurate name?

The title of this thread reflects poorly on dcum

Oh cmon. The Colorado thing is confusing. It’s either university of Colorado or cu boulder. Clutch your pearls…someone said UC Boulder!

Can Jeff please delete and we can start a new thread with an accurate name?

The title of this thread reflects poorly on dcum

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:CU Boulder is fine, but I think it depends on your child and his or her major. My DD didn’t love it — she found the girls to be too rich and catty — but she got a decent education. She felt like the diversity was less than it is on the East coast, which she missed. Boys might have a different time. Engineering school is excellent. Off campus housing is very expensive. The dining halls suck. It’s hard to get around if you don’t live close to campus or have a car because the buses don’t go late (she spends a lot on Ubers).

I don’t know anyone looking to Colorado for diversity.

This all sounds like someone who didn’t do research. Boulder is a hot place for young people => expensive => expensive housing => rich people.

It was more of a realization that diversity mattered.

That happened to me at Penn State main campus. And I'm a suburban white person.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is anecdotal, but in a session on campus, we were told direct admission to engineering was 25%-30% and slightly lower out of state. So anyone confusing the overall admit rate with engineering should re-check. Did not end up enrolling but the facilities were impressive.

I think a lot of the snark is 1) location, 2) over-emphasizing drugs which are now everywhere, and c) the rep of the school from 20-30 years ago. Are there still kids who party? Of course, but like any state school, a portion of the student population does not represent the total.

It is probably even more unusual for people here. We have family in Colorado and visit often. Comparing the more formal, less outdoorsy and gov't centered focus of DMV to the vibe of Colorado in general - you are bound to have a reaction.

What? DMV outdoorsy too --- Shenandoah, Blue ridge, Old Rag, Sugarloaf, Potomac river, Rock Creek Park, countless trails

You have no idea. People in boulder go rock climbing at lunch.

Fine we do that after[i] work not at lunch

You live in the dmv and go rock climbing after work? Where?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is anecdotal, but in a session on campus, we were told direct admission to engineering was 25%-30% and slightly lower out of state. So anyone confusing the overall admit rate with engineering should re-check. Did not end up enrolling but the facilities were impressive.

I think a lot of the snark is 1) location, 2) over-emphasizing drugs which are now everywhere, and c) the rep of the school from 20-30 years ago. Are there still kids who party? Of course, but like any state school, a portion of the student population does not represent the total.

It is probably even more unusual for people here. We have family in Colorado and visit often. Comparing the more formal, less outdoorsy and gov't centered focus of DMV to the vibe of Colorado in general - you are bound to have a reaction.

What? DMV outdoorsy too --- Shenandoah, Blue ridge, Old Rag, Sugarloaf, Potomac river, Rock Creek Park, countless trails

You have no idea. People in boulder go rock climbing at lunch.

Fine we do that after[i] work not at lunch

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is anecdotal, but in a session on campus, we were told direct admission to engineering was 25%-30% and slightly lower out of state. So anyone confusing the overall admit rate with engineering should re-check. Did not end up enrolling but the facilities were impressive.

I think a lot of the snark is 1) location, 2) over-emphasizing drugs which are now everywhere, and c) the rep of the school from 20-30 years ago. Are there still kids who party? Of course, but like any state school, a portion of the student population does not represent the total.

It is probably even more unusual for people here. We have family in Colorado and visit often. Comparing the more formal, less outdoorsy and gov't centered focus of DMV to the vibe of Colorado in general - you are bound to have a reaction.

What? DMV outdoorsy too --- Shenandoah, Blue ridge, Old Rag, Sugarloaf, Potomac river, Rock Creek Park, countless trails

You have no idea. People in boulder go rock climbing at lunch.

Anonymous wrote:This is anecdotal, but in a session on campus, we were told direct admission to engineering was 25%-30% and slightly lower out of state. So anyone confusing the overall admit rate with engineering should re-check. Did not end up enrolling but the facilities were impressive.

I think a lot of the snark is 1) location, 2) over-emphasizing drugs which are now everywhere, and c) the rep of the school from 20-30 years ago. Are there still kids who party? Of course, but like any state school, a portion of the student population does not represent the total.

It is probably even more unusual for people here. We have family in Colorado and visit often. Comparing the more formal, less outdoorsy and gov't centered focus of DMV to the vibe of Colorado in general - you are bound to have a reaction.

What? DMV outdoorsy too --- Shenandoah, Blue ridge, Old Rag, Sugarloaf, Potomac river, Rock Creek Park, countless trails

Anonymous wrote:We know a kid there and he is enjoying Colorado, but struggling with the transition. This may be an individual thing, but he was struggling to keep up with his work starting about two weeks in. He had some personal issues with friends and girlfriend at other schools. Greek life also seemed more important than classes. There seems to be a lot of partying.

For engineering or in general?

Decent school and lots of fun

This is anecdotal, but in a session on campus, we were told direct admission to engineering was 25%-30% and slightly lower out of state. So anyone confusing the overall admit rate with engineering should re-check. Did not end up enrolling but the facilities were impressive.

I think a lot of the snark is 1) location, 2) over-emphasizing drugs which are now everywhere, and c) the rep of the school from 20-30 years ago. Are there still kids who party? Of course, but like any state school, a portion of the student population does not represent the total.

It is probably even more unusual for people here. We have family in Colorado and visit often. Comparing the more formal, less outdoorsy and gov't centered focus of DMV to the vibe of Colorado in general - you are bound to have a reaction.

Anonymous wrote:He needs to be ok with the smell of weed.

The campus looked great. The town was nice too.

The campus newspaper was absolutely full of weed ads.

PhD alum who still lives in Colorado commenting on undergrad experience. The university has a wide mix of kids, but it is not as racially diverse as the DC area. It’s only slightly more in-state than out-of-state, and in-state kids come from wider socioeconomic backgrounds. Lots of opportunities for outdoors activities, some kids plan their class schedules so that they can go skiing on certain weekdays. There’s Greek life, but plenty of people don’t join.

The engineering school is great, would be thrilled if my kid attended. The posted acceptance rate is around 80%, but the out-of-state acceptance rate is lower, and engineering is even lower. Lots of people end up getting into Exploratory Studies vs. Engineering and some people get upset. They assume since CU has an high posted acceptance rate, they deserve to get directly in. Unless they changed it recently, you basically just need a B average in pre-req classes to get into Engineering from Exploratory Studies.

I would also look into Colorado Mines because it may end being similar in terms of admissions difficulty and is also a great school. Colorado State and Denver are not as strong in engineering and I would not recommend.

I have a kid at Leeds, they’re thriving. It’s been a fantastic experience for them this far. The “weed “talk is stupid as I see posts from DC all the time complaining about how the city smells like weed. That hasn’t been my experience. Kid is going Greek which they don’t expect but dirty rush and a pre bid convinced them. Also: instate.

I’ll admit it’s pretty crazy to pay OOS tuition for a state school IMO but that’s just me.

Mines is where an engineer should go.