Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How would that work with so many unincorporated areas? It works in other states because they actually have town/city government and taxes.
Easy. Make those areas incorporated and let them represent themselves instead of the county council member who "reps" them into giving developers everything they want.
No, it’s not easy. It would require massive change at the state level first.
+1. And the state in general is fine with countywide school districts. It's only an issue for MoCo and maybe a couple others.
If, in fantasy-land, this could be done, can it be done without each area also needing its own council/mayor, planning, zoning, trash pick-up and services, etc.? Usually towns and cities don’t get all their services from the county and have their own government along with their own BOE.
Also, small-city councils and mayors are typically a nightmare of their own.
Anonymous wrote:While there are times I wish Silver Spring was incorporated and more in control of its destiny like a normal city, I think splitting the school district is a bad idea. Think of moco as a city of a million. A small los Angeles. It's economic diversity is a superpower, even if most of y'all think poor people have cooties.
Anonymous wrote:While there are times I wish Silver Spring was incorporated and more in control of its destiny like a normal city, I think splitting the school district is a bad idea. Think of moco as a city of a million. A small los Angeles. It's economic diversity is a superpower, even if most of y'all think poor people have cooties.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How would that work with so many unincorporated areas? It works in other states because they actually have town/city government and taxes.
Easy. Make those areas incorporated and let them represent themselves instead of the county council member who "reps" them into giving developers everything they want.
No, it’s not easy. It would require massive change at the state level first.
+1. And the state in general is fine with countywide school districts. It's only an issue for MoCo and maybe a couple others.
It would make for many entertaining threads, though. Imagine the boundary issues creating all those cities. And how would the tax rates be determined?
“My block should have been in Kensington, not Wheaton!”
“My street is POTOMAC, not Gaithersburg!”
I grew up in a state with municipal school districts and those come with plenty of challenges, too.
They could do the whole thing by zipcodes and then combine zipcodes where necessary.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I get the frustration with McPS. But I also feel like a lot of these comments about the county having different needs are just veiled class resentments. Basically — east county is poor and has lots of immigrants so their needs are different (greater) than west county. In states that have those small school districts there is a lot of disparity between school districts and more de facto segregation in schools. I mean, look at Newton versus Boston. I think a lot of the “McPS is too big” sentiment is really just “we should ditch the low income areas of MoCo” sentiment.
That's exactly what it means.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I get the frustration with McPS. But I also feel like a lot of these comments about the county having different needs are just veiled class resentments. Basically — east county is poor and has lots of immigrants so their needs are different (greater) than west county. In states that have those small school districts there is a lot of disparity between school districts and more de facto segregation in schools. I mean, look at Newton versus Boston. I think a lot of the “McPS is too big” sentiment is really just “we should ditch the low income areas of MoCo” sentiment.
That's exactly what it means.
I think this is a fair critique and neither option is without flaws. Part of what we hear during the boundary discussions is that people feel they are pieces on the bureaucrat's chessboard. Moving to smaller districts would actually empower people in lower SES areas to take back control over the schools serving their kids through school board elections. That adds a layer of accountability.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I get the frustration with McPS. But I also feel like a lot of these comments about the county having different needs are just veiled class resentments. Basically — east county is poor and has lots of immigrants so their needs are different (greater) than west county. In states that have those small school districts there is a lot of disparity between school districts and more de facto segregation in schools. I mean, look at Newton versus Boston. I think a lot of the “McPS is too big” sentiment is really just “we should ditch the low income areas of MoCo” sentiment.
That's exactly what it means.