Anonymous wrote:If you try assisted living and he has memory issues, they will force you into a higher level of care.
My grandmas assisted living is so cheap- $2100 in another state (still big city though). There are so many more social opportunities versus in home care where you’re by yourself all day.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Assisted living is WAY cheaper unless someone is being exploited. I know someone doing essentially memory care at home, nearly 24/7 aides. It’s a huge amount of work just to manage everyone, and with a reasonable wage and overtime, the cost is astronomical.
Yes, it’s like having run a nursing home full-timeout out of their house without access to actual nurses or doctors. And double/triple the cost compared to facilities. Not worth it once they need a lot of care.
Anonymous wrote:Home care is better for everyone if parent can live separately and have hired caregivers. Not always realistic but it’s the best.
Anonymous wrote:I don't agree Home Care is best. My parents enjoyed more social interaction. Just the act of walking down the hall for meals, in one day they would have more social interaction than they would have in a week staying in their own home.
Anonymous wrote:Home care is better for everyone if parent can live separately and have hired caregivers. Not always realistic but it’s the best.
Anonymous wrote:Assisted living is WAY cheaper unless someone is being exploited. I know someone doing essentially memory care at home, nearly 24/7 aides. It’s a huge amount of work just to manage everyone, and with a reasonable wage and overtime, the cost is astronomical.
Anonymous wrote:Home care is better for everyone if parent can live separately and have hired caregivers. Not always realistic but it’s the best.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NP here trying to decide between Independent Living and very few hours of home care. Their home is paid off so it seems much more affordable if they just need few hours of care. Basically things that I do when I'm over there, but on a schedule.
Are there not home carers that have, say 2-3 places to go on a given day and don't expect all their salary from one client? Surely agencies schedule that up the same way they would house cleaning services and the like?
I would suggest independent living at a place that has continued care. It's social and it's much easier to move them at this stage, than later on. Most people do not want a few hours of work a day. They aren't paid for commuting between jobs and you get more down time when you are at the same place each day. They are paid terribly. You cannot expect the person to be on, do a bunch of tasks for a few hours, drive to another place and be working the whole time and then move on again for a wage that isn't livable.
Re: housecleaning services. A lot of those women are taken advantage of exploited and they do in their bodies working that hard all day and inhaling toxic chemicals.
Do you want to exploit someone? If you want the person to stay you need to be think of them as human beings, not work-horses.
Anonymous wrote:NP here trying to decide between Independent Living and very few hours of home care. Their home is paid off so it seems much more affordable if they just need few hours of care. Basically things that I do when I'm over there, but on a schedule.
Are there not home carers that have, say 2-3 places to go on a given day and don't expect all their salary from one client? Surely agencies schedule that up the same way they would house cleaning services and the like?
Anonymous wrote:NP here trying to decide between Independent Living and very few hours of home care. Their home is paid off so it seems much more affordable if they just need few hours of care. Basically things that I do when I'm over there, but on a schedule.
Are there not home carers that have, say 2-3 places to go on a given day and don't expect all their salary from one client? Surely agencies schedule that up the same way they would house cleaning services and the like?