Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A very rough estimate: your annual pension at age 58 is $78K. The present value of a $1 annuity at that age is somewhere around 20. So, at age 58, the value will be $78K x 20 =$1.56M. Discounts it back 17 years to now, at 4%, it’s about $800K.
An actuary.
There is no guarantee you will make it to 78 years of age. Why are you trying to value this when tomorrow is not promised. It's not like a 401 or IRA that is inheritable.
So many haters lol
Not a hater. Just stating facts. A person can live to the ripe old age of 99 and collect a pension for thirty-five years. Or an otherwise relatively healthy person can retire at 62 and have a massive heart attack and drop dead at 63, which is considered young for death. One year of pension received. Not a hater, just someone with personal experience and no that it is a wonderful benefit that cannot be inherited in whole. That is why it should not be calculated for 20 year future value. If you live to see old age, a pension is gravy.
Please stop. You are just displaying your ignorance. Everyone understands that there is uncertainty and that you may live till 100 or die before your pension. But just because there is uncertainty doesn’t mean that you can’t put a value on something. Insurance companies do this every day when they sell annuities, hence this actuary is actually answering the question.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A very rough estimate: your annual pension at age 58 is $78K. The present value of a $1 annuity at that age is somewhere around 20. So, at age 58, the value will be $78K x 20 =$1.56M. Discounts it back 17 years to now, at 4%, it’s about $800K.
An actuary.
There is no guarantee you will make it to 78 years of age. Why are you trying to value this when tomorrow is not promised. It's not like a 401 or IRA that is inheritable.
So many haters lol
Not a hater. Just stating facts. A person can live to the ripe old age of 99 and collect a pension for thirty-five years. Or an otherwise relatively healthy person can retire at 62 and have a massive heart attack and drop dead at 63, which is considered young for death. One year of pension received. Not a hater, just someone with personal experience and no that it is a wonderful benefit that cannot be inherited in whole. That is why it should not be calculated for 20 year future value. If you live to see old age, a pension is gravy.
Please stop. You are just displaying your ignorance. Everyone understands that there is uncertainty and that you may live till 100 or die before your pension. But just because there is uncertainty doesn’t mean that you can’t put a value on something. Insurance companies do this every day when they sell annuities, hence this actuary is actually answering the question.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A very rough estimate: your annual pension at age 58 is $78K. The present value of a $1 annuity at that age is somewhere around 20. So, at age 58, the value will be $78K x 20 =$1.56M. Discounts it back 17 years to now, at 4%, it’s about $800K.
An actuary.
There is no guarantee you will make it to 78 years of age. Why are you trying to value this when tomorrow is not promised. It's not like a 401 or IRA that is inheritable.
So many haters lol
Not a hater. Just stating facts. A person can live to the ripe old age of 99 and collect a pension for thirty-five years. Or an otherwise relatively healthy person can retire at 62 and have a massive heart attack and drop dead at 63, which is considered young for death. One year of pension received. Not a hater, just someone with personal experience and no that it is a wonderful benefit that cannot be inherited in whole. That is why it should not be calculated for 20 year future value. If you live to see old age, a pension is gravy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, don't think of retirement security as a number, but as an income stream.
Figure out how much income you will need in retirement. Say right now, your income is $60,000 and you are 45 years old.
Let's say you want to retire at age 60. You have calculated that your pension will be $35,000 per year, and your Social Security will be $15,000 per year.
If your income grows at 3% per year, your income at age 60 will be approx. $94,000. If you want to retire on 80% of your income, you will need an income of about $75,000 per year.
Your pension and Social Security will be $50,000 per year - so you will need enough retirement savings to bring in $25,000 per year.
This is a bit simplified, but shows you how to think it through - "net worth" does not tell you much compared to estimating your income needs.
OP - thanks that is helpful. In order to determine retirement income needed I assume we take out things like student loans, daycare, kids extra curriculars, mortgage (hopefully) and get down to the nitty gritty amount. We are currently spending closer to $30,000 a month all in but obviously hope that number goes down over time!
Anonymous wrote:OP, don't think of retirement security as a number, but as an income stream.
Figure out how much income you will need in retirement. Say right now, your income is $60,000 and you are 45 years old.
Let's say you want to retire at age 60. You have calculated that your pension will be $35,000 per year, and your Social Security will be $15,000 per year.
If your income grows at 3% per year, your income at age 60 will be approx. $94,000. If you want to retire on 80% of your income, you will need an income of about $75,000 per year.
Your pension and Social Security will be $50,000 per year - so you will need enough retirement savings to bring in $25,000 per year.
This is a bit simplified, but shows you how to think it through - "net worth" does not tell you much compared to estimating your income needs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A very rough estimate: your annual pension at age 58 is $78K. The present value of a $1 annuity at that age is somewhere around 20. So, at age 58, the value will be $78K x 20 =$1.56M. Discounts it back 17 years to now, at 4%, it’s about $800K.
An actuary.
There is no guarantee you will make it to 78 years of age. Why are you trying to value this when tomorrow is not promised. It's not like a 401 or IRA that is inheritable.
What do we ever truly own except the ground beneath our feet etc? I admire your approach, but would suggest that you stay off the money and finances board. Stick to cooking, religion etc.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A very rough estimate: your annual pension at age 58 is $78K. The present value of a $1 annuity at that age is somewhere around 20. So, at age 58, the value will be $78K x 20 =$1.56M. Discounts it back 17 years to now, at 4%, it’s about $800K.
An actuary.
There is no guarantee you will make it to 78 years of age. Why are you trying to value this when tomorrow is not promised. It's not like a 401 or IRA that is inheritable.
So many haters lol
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You don’t factor it into net worth and that is what dodo OP is attempting to do
Yes you do.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A very rough estimate: your annual pension at age 58 is $78K. The present value of a $1 annuity at that age is somewhere around 20. So, at age 58, the value will be $78K x 20 =$1.56M. Discounts it back 17 years to now, at 4%, it’s about $800K.
An actuary.
There is no guarantee you will make it to 78 years of age. Why are you trying to value this when tomorrow is not promised. It's not like a 401 or IRA that is inheritable.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why do you need to know your pension value for retirement planning? You don't need to know the value of your social security for example. All that matters is what you can expect to receive monthly from your pension, social security or other sources. Sounds to me like you want to count the value in your net worth, which is kind of pathetic.
+1
Plus many do not get inherited when you pass or at most only to a spouse
They can inherit his Roth and investments in taxable
Anonymous wrote:Guessing OP is the author of the net worth post. Lame.
Anonymous wrote:You don’t factor it into net worth and that is what dodo OP is attempting to do