Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This obviously sucks. But what sucks even more is that some people who are excepted and working have been told to mark their timecards as furloughed. So if this comes to pass, they won't get paid even though they've been working as usual.
I’d refuse to do one ounce of work and I wouldn’t go in to office.
And that is what sets civil servants apart. Many of us believe in what we do. I for one believe our military service members have earned the health care I provide and to withhold that care because my paycheck may be delayed, or even absent, is disrespectful of their sacrifice.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This obviously sucks. But what sucks even more is that some people who are excepted and working have been told to mark their timecards as furloughed. So if this comes to pass, they won't get paid even though they've been working as usual.
I’d refuse to do one ounce of work and I wouldn’t go in to office.
And that is what sets civil servants apart. Many of us believe in what we do. I for one believe our military service members have earned the health care I provide and to withhold that care because my paycheck may be delayed, or even absent, is disrespectful of their sacrifice.
Did you read that WP article about all of the disability fraud veterans are collecting?
Do you have a link that is not behind a paywall? I’d like to know what they are basing that on.
Gift link:
https://wapo.st/42YTJLg
Not working.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Probably not legal.
May be an attempt to encourage voluntary resignations.
When did this administration start caring about what is legal?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:work = pay
That's not what the law says. The law says "each employee of the United States Government or of a District of Columbia public employer furloughed as a result of
a covered lapse in appropriations shall be paid for the period of the lapse in appropriations"
Actually, I believe it says "each employee of the United States Government or of a District of Columbia public employer furloughed as a result of
a covered lapse in appropriations shall be paid for the period of the lapse in appropriations regardless of scheduled pay dates, and subject to the enactment of appropriations Acts ending the lapse.". The phrase "subject to the enactment...ending the lapse" would leave room for a bill that said no pay for feds.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This obviously sucks. But what sucks even more is that some people who are excepted and working have been told to mark their timecards as furloughed. So if this comes to pass, they won't get paid even though they've been working as usual.
I’d refuse to do one ounce of work and I wouldn’t go in to office.
And that is what sets civil servants apart. Many of us believe in what we do. I for one believe our military service members have earned the health care I provide and to withhold that care because my paycheck may be delayed, or even absent, is disrespectful of their sacrifice.
Did you read that WP article about all of the disability fraud veterans are collecting?
Do you have a link that is not behind a paywall? I’d like to know what they are basing that on.
Gift link:
https://wapo.st/42YTJLg
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How about Congress can’t leave the building until they come to an agreement? It’s not like they haven’t had this budget since March. Lock them in and throw in some sleeping bags. They shouldn’t leave until they’ve done their jobs.
+1000 but skip the sleeping bags. Don't make them comfortable. And, how about stopping their pay.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This obviously sucks. But what sucks even more is that some people who are excepted and working have been told to mark their timecards as furloughed. So if this comes to pass, they won't get paid even though they've been working as usual.
I’d refuse to do one ounce of work and I wouldn’t go in to office.
And that is what sets civil servants apart. Many of us believe in what we do. I for one believe our military service members have earned the health care I provide and to withhold that care because my paycheck may be delayed, or even absent, is disrespectful of their sacrifice.
Did you read that WP article about all of the disability fraud veterans are collecting?
Do you have a link that is not behind a paywall? I’d like to know what they are basing that on.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This obviously sucks. But what sucks even more is that some people who are excepted and working have been told to mark their timecards as furloughed. So if this comes to pass, they won't get paid even though they've been working as usual.
I’d refuse to do one ounce of work and I wouldn’t go in to office.
And that is what sets civil servants apart. Many of us believe in what we do. I for one believe our military service members have earned the health care I provide and to withhold that care because my paycheck may be delayed, or even absent, is disrespectful of their sacrifice.
Did you read that WP article about all of the disability fraud veterans are collecting?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This obviously sucks. But what sucks even more is that some people who are excepted and working have been told to mark their timecards as furloughed. So if this comes to pass, they won't get paid even though they've been working as usual.
I’d refuse to do one ounce of work and I wouldn’t go in to office.
And that is what sets civil servants apart. Many of us believe in what we do. I for one believe our military service members have earned the health care I provide and to withhold that care because my paycheck may be delayed, or even absent, is disrespectful of their sacrifice.
Anonymous wrote:I'm a democrat but this is just one more confirmation that the Democrats are playing checkers while the Republicans are playing chess (or perhaps something more serious like nuclear chicken). This shutdown was always going to cause more pain than than the dems will gain - if they gain anything at all in the end.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:work = pay
That's not what the law says. The law says "each employee of the United States Government or of a District of Columbia public employer furloughed as a result of
a covered lapse in appropriations shall be paid for the period of the lapse in appropriations"
Anonymous wrote:How about Congress can’t leave the building until they come to an agreement? It’s not like they haven’t had this budget since March. Lock them in and throw in some sleeping bags. They shouldn’t leave until they’ve done their jobs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This obviously sucks. But what sucks even more is that some people who are excepted and working have been told to mark their timecards as furloughed. So if this comes to pass, they won't get paid even though they've been working as usual.
I’d refuse to do one ounce of work and I wouldn’t go in to office.