Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lawyer- I use it to help me re write emails. It helps with my tone. I’m female and have always struggled with being too nice and taking on too much work. And then I swung to being too rude in emails. AI gives a good balanced middle tone.
The lawyers in this thread who are being so negative about AI simply don’t understand how vast it can be in its uses. It is such an awesome tool even if it can’t do a “legal” analysis. It can do the first draft of something like a blog post, it can create meeting minutes from a transcript, it can create detailed notes from a transcript, it can create a full PowerPoint presentation from a compliance document, it can help turn text into tables and develop databases, it can help create really advanced excel tools to do analyses, it can teach you how to create advanced templates. It’s amazing.
Np also a lawyer who has barely used ai. Our admin people are being encouraged to use it, I can see it would be helpful for them. Lawyers by and large are not for the reasons mentioned on this thread.
Lawyers on dcum typically are the best of the best lawyers - we graduated top of our top law schools and trained in some of the most demanding work places in the US. People like to shit on lawyers and say book smart doesn’t mean smart, but reality is that to be an attorney in my firm you need to be exceptionally bright, hard working, productive and good at stuff. You just didn’t get through college and law school with top grades without being so.
With that background, all the things you list…. I do perfectly and efficiently the first time. Other people on this thread saying it takes them “a quick” twenty mins to draft a very short email? My short emails take 2-3 mins and while I concede may have a minor typo, their tone and content is flawless. That’s why my clients pay me $2000 an hour. I need to be able to send that kind of client product for 10 hours a day in near consistent quality. I can produce the email, structure the excel, draft the article, etc in perfect form the first time in the same time it would take me to input the information in ai. Certainly less time than it would take me to review and edit the ai output. And the ai output is likely to be just not as good as what I can do. If I could not do it that well and that quickly the first time, I would have been pushed out of biglaw a long time ago.
I have friends in regular non legal jobs and their jobs are just less demanding. The hours and deadlines are less demanding and the work output is less demanding. My dh is a non lawyer (and very bright and very successful) but he may spend all day just debating a draft email he needs to send to the ceo, and he can get away with that in his job. I could see how ai might add value in that context (although even then, the reason why dh makes seven figures for a job where his only task in a day is writing an email is because he is damn good at communication and very well liked, so the times we’ve put his emails thru ai we’ve been very disappointed with the output because it no longer sounded like him).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lawyer- I use it to help me re write emails. It helps with my tone. I’m female and have always struggled with being too nice and taking on too much work. And then I swung to being too rude in emails. AI gives a good balanced middle tone.
The lawyers in this thread who are being so negative about AI simply don’t understand how vast it can be in its uses. It is such an awesome tool even if it can’t do a “legal” analysis. It can do the first draft of something like a blog post, it can create meeting minutes from a transcript, it can create detailed notes from a transcript, it can create a full PowerPoint presentation from a compliance document, it can help turn text into tables and develop databases, it can help create really advanced excel tools to do analyses, it can teach you how to create advanced templates. It’s amazing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lawyer- I use it to help me re write emails. It helps with my tone. I’m female and have always struggled with being too nice and taking on too much work. And then I swung to being too rude in emails. AI gives a good balanced middle tone.
The lawyers in this thread who are being so negative about AI simply don’t understand how vast it can be in its uses. It is such an awesome tool even if it can’t do a “legal” analysis. It can do the first draft of something like a blog post, it can create meeting minutes from a transcript, it can create detailed notes from a transcript, it can create a full PowerPoint presentation from a compliance document, it can help turn text into tables and develop databases, it can help create really advanced excel tools to do analyses, it can teach you how to create advanced templates. It’s amazing.
my assessment is that it can take substandard product and get it to plausible-sounding mediocrity pretty quickly.
so if you're someone who needed to be coaxed through picking a topic and then creating an outline and refining the outline and then eventually writing a paper over several weeks of high school or college— i can see how AI might seem miraculous.
but the effort i have put into actually refining the results of AI is generally more than I would put into just... writing in the first place. i'm happy that you've found a tool that helps you.
Anonymous wrote:I’ve tried but it’s usually wrong. I am an accountant.
Anonymous wrote:I use it all of the time. I work in a newsroom and it is helpful for getting me started on headlines and social language.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Almost never. I’m a lawyer and all my experiences with it have been bad. The only exception is to get a non-client writing project started (like an alert for the firm blog). It can help break through writers block.
+1. AI gets so many things wrong that it’s a complete waste of my time. As for email tone, I already know how to adjust my tone to fit my audience. That’s my job.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Almost never. I’m a lawyer and all my experiences with it have been bad. The only exception is to get a non-client writing project started (like an alert for the firm blog). It can help break through writers block.
+1. AI gets so many things wrong that it’s a complete waste of my time. As for email tone, I already know how to adjust my tone to fit my audience. That’s my job.
Everyone THINKS they are great at this- like everyone THINKS they are great drivers. I’m sure YOU are wonderful. It’s the other 99% that are bad but think they are good that I’m talking about.
This is meaningless. If I look at two emails, one I wrote and one AI wrote, and I prefer the tone in the one I wrote ... then that's the tone I intended. If you dislike my tone, that problem is not solved by AI drafting an email that I edit back to what I meant to say. - DP
If I were you I'd keep that one that you like, next time you need to write an email put your bullet points in, put your original email in and say write the bullet points to match this tone.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lawyer- I use it to help me re write emails. It helps with my tone. I’m female and have always struggled with being too nice and taking on too much work. And then I swung to being too rude in emails. AI gives a good balanced middle tone.
The lawyers in this thread who are being so negative about AI simply don’t understand how vast it can be in its uses. It is such an awesome tool even if it can’t do a “legal” analysis. It can do the first draft of something like a blog post, it can create meeting minutes from a transcript, it can create detailed notes from a transcript, it can create a full PowerPoint presentation from a compliance document, it can help turn text into tables and develop databases, it can help create really advanced excel tools to do analyses, it can teach you how to create advanced templates. It’s amazing.
I don't need to do any of those tasks.
There are actual uses for AI in law, but they are narrow and not usually core legal work (e.g., you don't have to be a lawyer to summarize a transcript). The insistence that we find ways to use it is annoying. It's like insisting I use a screwdriver to cook dinner, and saying I'm the problem if I can't figure out how that would be useful. And then simultaneously saying screwdrivers will replace chefs.
As someone else said, useful tools get used. If your customers don't think it's useful, the problem isn't the customer.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lawyer- I use it to help me re write emails. It helps with my tone. I’m female and have always struggled with being too nice and taking on too much work. And then I swung to being too rude in emails. AI gives a good balanced middle tone.
The lawyers in this thread who are being so negative about AI simply don’t understand how vast it can be in its uses. It is such an awesome tool even if it can’t do a “legal” analysis. It can do the first draft of something like a blog post, it can create meeting minutes from a transcript, it can create detailed notes from a transcript, it can create a full PowerPoint presentation from a compliance document, it can help turn text into tables and develop databases, it can help create really advanced excel tools to do analyses, it can teach you how to create advanced templates. It’s amazing.
my assessment is that it can take substandard product and get it to plausible-sounding mediocrity pretty quickly.
so if you're someone who needed to be coaxed through picking a topic and then creating an outline and refining the outline and then eventually writing a paper over several weeks of high school or college— i can see how AI might seem miraculous.
but the effort i have put into actually refining the results of AI is generally more than I would put into just... writing in the first place. i'm happy that you've found a tool that helps you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lawyer- I use it to help me re write emails. It helps with my tone. I’m female and have always struggled with being too nice and taking on too much work. And then I swung to being too rude in emails. AI gives a good balanced middle tone.
The lawyers in this thread who are being so negative about AI simply don’t understand how vast it can be in its uses. It is such an awesome tool even if it can’t do a “legal” analysis. It can do the first draft of something like a blog post, it can create meeting minutes from a transcript, it can create detailed notes from a transcript, it can create a full PowerPoint presentation from a compliance document, it can help turn text into tables and develop databases, it can help create really advanced excel tools to do analyses, it can teach you how to create advanced templates. It’s amazing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Almost never. I’m a lawyer and all my experiences with it have been bad. The only exception is to get a non-client writing project started (like an alert for the firm blog). It can help break through writers block.
+1. AI gets so many things wrong that it’s a complete waste of my time. As for email tone, I already know how to adjust my tone to fit my audience. That’s my job.
Everyone THINKS they are great at this- like everyone THINKS they are great drivers. I’m sure YOU are wonderful. It’s the other 99% that are bad but think they are good that I’m talking about.
This is meaningless. If I look at two emails, one I wrote and one AI wrote, and I prefer the tone in the one I wrote ... then that's the tone I intended. If you dislike my tone, that problem is not solved by AI drafting an email that I edit back to what I meant to say. - DP
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Almost never. I’m a lawyer and all my experiences with it have been bad. The only exception is to get a non-client writing project started (like an alert for the firm blog). It can help break through writers block.
+1. AI gets so many things wrong that it’s a complete waste of my time. As for email tone, I already know how to adjust my tone to fit my audience. That’s my job.
Everyone THINKS they are great at this- like everyone THINKS they are great drivers. I’m sure YOU are wonderful. It’s the other 99% that are bad but think they are good that I’m talking about.