families rank prestige lower than other markers of a “good” college: the availability of internships and research projects, the job placement of graduates, the strength of specific majors. More and more families are measuring a school’s worth by what it delivers rather than what it represents.
Anonymous wrote:The play is to go to a school where it can be both. At a school like say Williams, you can major in virtually anything quantitative and, with good grades, get a job in banking; or major in virtually anything and get a job in consulting with good grades and internships.
But if you're at say Marymount, you don't necessarily have that luxury. You want to do nursing or business there.
'Passion' is often code for nonprofit/academic work that pays cruddy. It should be treated with suspicion.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s a bad idea to major in something you aren’t that passionate about just because that’s where the jobs seem to be at.
Look what happened to CS! A lot can change in 4 years, so make sure your kid gets a well rounded education and learns how to learn, not just learn specific skills.
Agree with PP that avoiding loans is of the utmost importance. There are no guarantees of any degree “paying off” in specific monetary terms and everyone needs to understand that going in.
There is value in going to college even if you end up working in a completely different field than you majored in, as long as you stay away from debt.
We will be paying a lot for DS to attend a SLAC. I am fully prepared for the possibility that he may not end up with a traditional white collar job, and I am OK with that.
Absolutely not.
It’s a bad idea to major in something you despise, but the “passion jobs” are highly overrated. For one thing, every job has a bunch of dreadful tasks, and when you are just starting out, you are likely to get those tasks anyway. Second, having financial security when you come from a $80K/ year household is amazing. There is a lot satisfaction coming from that, maybe even more than following your passions in a job. Besides, there are plenty of other ways to follow your passions in life. And last but not least, the passion jobs tend to go to the well connected. The nonprofits, publishing, arts and the like are bursting with trust funders. Pluck gets you much farther in accounting.
Anonymous wrote:Job training, unless you're rich enough to not need it for job training.
Anonymous wrote:It’s a bad idea to major in something you aren’t that passionate about just because that’s where the jobs seem to be at.
Look what happened to CS! A lot can change in 4 years, so make sure your kid gets a well rounded education and learns how to learn, not just learn specific skills.
Agree with PP that avoiding loans is of the utmost importance. There are no guarantees of any degree “paying off” in specific monetary terms and everyone needs to understand that going in.
There is value in going to college even if you end up working in a completely different field than you majored in, as long as you stay away from debt.
We will be paying a lot for DS to attend a SLAC. I am fully prepared for the possibility that he may not end up with a traditional white collar job, and I am OK with that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Your kid has no generational wealth. Maybe even opposite generational wealth given your low HHI.
Obviously college is for job training. Even if your kid ends up going to Harvard.
80k is low?
For an entire household that’s sending a kid to college? Yes, when paired with low assets. (No if it’s annual income from a trust fund …. )
Emory just set their tuition-free bar at $200k, by the way. Not sure how that’s going to work out for them exactly, but it’s worth a look: https://news.emory.edu/features/2025/09/er_emory_advantage_plus_17-09-2025/index.html
As the first 2nd tier college to do it, Emory stands out. Four elite colleges Princeton, Penn, MIT, Harvard already have it. The rest of the T10 is going to have to follow suit or lose out in the fight for the top need-based aid kids.
OP your kid will pay close to 0 at these schools and will get learning and enough training to go on to any possible career.
Aim high if your kid has top stats/rigor.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Your kid has no generational wealth. Maybe even opposite generational wealth given your low HHI.
Obviously college is for job training. Even if your kid ends up going to Harvard.
80k is low?
For an entire household that’s sending a kid to college? Yes, when paired with low assets. (No if it’s annual income from a trust fund …. )
Emory just set their tuition-free bar at $200k, by the way. Not sure how that’s going to work out for them exactly, but it’s worth a look: https://news.emory.edu/features/2025/09/er_emory_advantage_plus_17-09-2025/index.html
Anonymous wrote:Job training, unless you're rich enough to not need it for job training.