Anonymous wrote:Nothing will come of this. At this point, the judiciary has a modicum of integrity and they tend to follow the rules. If the Barbie-US Attorney comes up with an indictment, it will be full of lies and will be tossed immediately, even by a Trump-appointed judge. Trump's associates are criminals, but the judges, even the very conservative ones, are generally willing to follow the law.

Anonymous wrote:The statute of limitations on the perjury charge expires next Tuesday, September 30th

Anonymous wrote:Trump is only going to tolerate grand juries refusing to return an indictment before he targets those grand jurors individually. He’ll sic the IRS on them, and find all sorts of other ways to harass them.

You say Trump is immune from prosecution but his staff isn’t? You say judges will hold Trump’s people accountable if they do this? No, no they won’t. They are not going to dare intervene because Trump controls their security via the U.S. Marshals Service. Roberts obviously made a deal with Trump after Congress stiffed the Supreme Court police in the Appropriations mark for FY2026. So now Trump is seeking the money the SCOTUS Police needs to take on full security responsibilities for the SCOTUS justices. In exchange, the Roberts Court continues to serve Trump.

Trump is going to raise the cost of opposing him. With the bullets being scrawled with supposedly anti-Trump messages, the next step will be Trump ordering loyalist troops and National Guard forces to open fire on Democrats. He has to shut down opposition before he’s exposed as less than all-powerful, and he’s going to pull out the stops Nightvof Long Knives-style to do so.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP,

The right is celebrating political oppression.

The left is lamenting political oppression.

The left detests Comey, for what he did to Hillary Clinton. Unlike you, but like Rogan, Cruz and other non-leftists who decried Kimmel's temporary cancellation, we do understand what this is about. It's about this White House's attempts to become a dictatorship and suppress any dissent or independent thought.

You should clarify this in your mind.

Here is the thing: this is the tit for tat for all that lawfare committed against Trump. (Many people, not just maga, see the lawsuits against him as lawfare)

If someone strongly believes that lawfare is wrong, they should not condone it even in a tit-for-tat situation.

Strongly disagree. Tit for tat response to lawfare isnt just acceptable, it's politically *obligated*. Trump was right in that tweet that people are wondering why he hasn't done it; you cannot have the dems do this while they are in office and then not retaliate out of principle. You have to retaliate so that there is a sense of mutually assured destruction. Otherwise the left will just pick off the right with prosecutions (and assassinations- we need to see some of these assassins publicly executed after a fair trial).

I hope you're a troll.

Not everyone who disagrees with you is doing it to spite you. Other people have entire lives and worlds that have nothing to do with you.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP,

The right is celebrating political oppression.

The left is lamenting political oppression.

The left detests Comey, for what he did to Hillary Clinton. Unlike you, but like Rogan, Cruz and other non-leftists who decried Kimmel's temporary cancellation, we do understand what this is about. It's about this White House's attempts to become a dictatorship and suppress any dissent or independent thought.

You should clarify this in your mind.

Here is the thing: this is the tit for tat for all that lawfare committed against Trump. (Many people, not just maga, see the lawsuits against him as lawfare)

If someone strongly believes that lawfare is wrong, they should not condone it even in a tit-for-tat situation.

Strongly disagree. Tit for tat response to lawfare isnt just acceptable, it's politically *obligated*. Trump was right in that tweet that people are wondering why he hasn't done it; you cannot have the dems do this while they are in office and then not retaliate out of principle. You have to retaliate so that there is a sense of mutually assured destruction. Otherwise the left will just pick off the right with prosecutions (and assassinations- we need to see some of these assassins publicly executed after a fair trial).

I hope you're a troll.

Not everyone who disagrees with you is doing it to spite you. Other people have entire lives and worlds that have nothing to do with you.

He got a preemptive pardon.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP,

The right is celebrating political oppression.

The left is lamenting political oppression.

The left detests Comey, for what he did to Hillary Clinton. Unlike you, but like Rogan, Cruz and other non-leftists who decried Kimmel's temporary cancellation, we do understand what this is about. It's about this White House's attempts to become a dictatorship and suppress any dissent or independent thought.

You should clarify this in your mind.

Here is the thing: this is the tit for tat for all that lawfare committed against Trump. (Many people, not just maga, see the lawsuits against him as lawfare)

If someone strongly believes that lawfare is wrong, they should not condone it even in a tit-for-tat situation.

Strongly disagree. Tit for tat response to lawfare isnt just acceptable, it's politically *obligated*. Trump was right in that tweet that people are wondering why he hasn't done it; you cannot have the dems do this while they are in office and then not retaliate out of principle. You have to retaliate so that there is a sense of mutually assured destruction. Otherwise the left will just pick off the right with prosecutions (and assassinations- we need to see some of these assassins publicly executed after a fair trial).

I hope you're a troll.

Not everyone who disagrees with you is doing it to spite you. Other people have entire lives and worlds that have nothing to do with you.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP,

The right is celebrating political oppression.

The left is lamenting political oppression.

The left detests Comey, for what he did to Hillary Clinton. Unlike you, but like Rogan, Cruz and other non-leftists who decried Kimmel's temporary cancellation, we do understand what this is about. It's about this White House's attempts to become a dictatorship and suppress any dissent or independent thought.

You should clarify this in your mind.

Here is the thing: this is the tit for tat for all that lawfare committed against Trump. (Many people, not just maga, see the lawsuits against him as lawfare)

If someone strongly believes that lawfare is wrong, they should not condone it even in a tit-for-tat situation.

Strongly disagree. Tit for tat response to lawfare isnt just acceptable, it's politically *obligated*. Trump was right in that tweet that people are wondering why he hasn't done it; you cannot have the dems do this while they are in office and then not retaliate out of principle. You have to retaliate so that there is a sense of mutually assured destruction. Otherwise the left will just pick off the right with prosecutions (and assassinations- we need to see some of these assassins publicly executed after a fair trial).

I hope you're a troll.

Not everyone who disagrees with you is doing it to spite you. Other people have entire lives and worlds that have nothing to do with you.

Anonymous wrote:Dang. I really wanted Adam Schiff to be indicted first.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP,

The right is celebrating political oppression.

The left is lamenting political oppression.

The left detests Comey, for what he did to Hillary Clinton. Unlike you, but like Rogan, Cruz and other non-leftists who decried Kimmel's temporary cancellation, we do understand what this is about. It's about this White House's attempts to become a dictatorship and suppress any dissent or independent thought.

You should clarify this in your mind.

Here is the thing: this is the tit for tat for all that lawfare committed against Trump. (Many people, not just maga, see the lawsuits against him as lawfare)

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP,

The right is celebrating political oppression.

The left is lamenting political oppression.

The left detests Comey, for what he did to Hillary Clinton. Unlike you, but like Rogan, Cruz and other non-leftists who decried Kimmel's temporary cancellation, we do understand what this is about. It's about this White House's attempts to become a dictatorship and suppress any dissent or independent thought.

You should clarify this in your mind.

Here is the thing: this is the tit for tat for all that lawfare committed against Trump. (Many people, not just maga, see the lawsuits against him as lawfare)