Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There are two kinds of XC kids and parents- the serious runners vs the kids who just want to be on a team and put it on their college application. The first group is very competitive.
Indeed. And thankfully the team scoring aspect gives at least some of the non-serious runners an opportunity to make an impact.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Langley freshman coming in with a dominant time in the Varsity girls race.
Unfortunately for Langley, there were already four Robinson runners in the team tent drinking Gatorade when Langley's “dominant” freshman crossed the finish line.
Come for the parking advice, stay for the XC trash talk.
Right? I thought XC parents were supposed to nice.
Agree. On the prior XC thread I requested that specific coaches and athletes be left out of it but was told that was policing speech.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Langley freshman coming in with a dominant time in the Varsity girls race.
Unfortunately for Langley, there were already four Robinson runners in the team tent drinking Gatorade when Langley's “dominant” freshman crossed the finish line.
Come for the parking advice, stay for the XC trash talk.
Right? I thought XC parents were supposed to nice.
The lesson: avoid shameless self-promotion to have positive interactions with XC parents on DCUM.
Anonymous wrote:There are two kinds of XC kids and parents- the serious runners vs the kids who just want to be on a team and put it on their college application. The first group is very competitive.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Langley freshman coming in with a dominant time in the Varsity girls race.
Unfortunately for Langley, there were already four Robinson runners in the team tent drinking Gatorade when Langley's “dominant” freshman crossed the finish line.
Come for the parking advice, stay for the XC trash talk.
Right? I thought XC parents were supposed to nice.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Langley freshman coming in with a dominant time in the Varsity girls race.
Unfortunately for Langley, there were already four Robinson runners in the team tent drinking Gatorade when Langley's “dominant” freshman crossed the finish line.
Come for the parking advice, stay for the XC trash talk.
Right? I thought XC parents were supposed to nice.
Agree. On the prior XC thread I requested that specific coaches and athletes be left out of it but was told that was policing speech.[/quote
I wonder how many runners were wearing the carbon fiber plate super shoes shoes at the meet. They aren't cheap - 400 dollars a pop - but they enhance performance for most. I would think that girls 5 minutes or under for the mile or boys 4:20 under would feel obliged to wear them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Langley freshman coming in with a dominant time in the Varsity girls race.
Unfortunately for Langley, there were already four Robinson runners in the team tent drinking Gatorade when Langley's “dominant” freshman crossed the finish line.
Come for the parking advice, stay for the XC trash talk.
Right? I thought XC parents were supposed to nice.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Langley freshman coming in with a dominant time in the Varsity girls race.
Unfortunately for Langley, there were already four Robinson runners in the team tent drinking Gatorade when Langley's “dominant” freshman crossed the finish line.
Come for the parking advice, stay for the XC trash talk.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not a Langley parent but any girl who is finishing in the top 50 at Oatlands is impressive. There are a ton of runners and a ton of talents but having a fast freshman is not unique. All the current fast sophomores, juniors and seniors were very fast freshman.
It just makes Langley a new contender.
Anonymous wrote:If someone finished in the top 100 for varsity girls do you think colleges will notice them, or not so much because it wasn’t a PR? Do colleges know how hard the course is?