Anonymous wrote:Ugly (and lazy) imo. When I see it I just think the owner (or designer) was just too lazy to find a proper coordinated backsplash and just ran on the counter. Marble subway tile looks bed imo but not the most Maint free.
A good backsplash is time consuming to select. I agree that many designers recommend taking the slab up the wall as a knee jerk reaction because it is easy. I find it odd because usually designers are all about layering and textures and visual interest, and putting the slab up achieves none of that. And what your eye likes to see once as a “wow” moment, is not necessarily the right choice for a room that is a workhorse space that you walk into multiple times a day.
I especially wouldn’t do it with quartz because the whole idea of quartz is that it imitates stone but is more maintenance free/cheaper, and it looks that way. No matter how great quartz looks today, it’s still an imitation product, and putting it on a vertical surface is going to draw more attention to the fact that it is not real.
And for everyone who claims that their cambria/silestone/caesarstone borghese aventura carara calacatta bugatti versace quartz looks so real and fools everyone, no, it does not. I am far from an expert, but after renovating one kitchen, I can always tell the difference. Real stone is so much less perfect than quartz - the colors are more varied, the veining is unexpected, and polished stone is translucent. I’m not anti quartz as a material, but using it as backsplash is something that is going to join the tumbled travertine kitchen as an idea that did not age well.