Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is some website that is aggregating all posts from people who are ‘celebrating’ his death and posting their names and employers.

Good.

Why is this good?

It’s fine, and justifies sites like the ICE list, but why do you think that it’s good?

Would you also think it’s good if we start aggregating the people that ramble on about leftists, like a maga-watch site? For example, to make sure that they aren’t teaching children?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.foxnews.com/politics/fema-employee-placed-leave-saying-flags-shouldnt-half-staff-racist-homophobe-charlie-kirk

I’m a little curious if his boss was a Instagram friend? Did it go viral? How did it get to the attention of decision makers.

But be careful and thoughtful of what you post. I was not a fan of Kirk, but those are harsh words for a murdered young father.

Kirk was a father of young children when he was condoning Biblical punishment of stoning for Gays, wasn't he? Whoever posted about the flags was correct. Nor should Air Force 2 have been Valkyries returning him to Odin!

Trump will do anything to keep Epstein off the front page.

That myth of him condoning the stoning of gays is even understood by Stephen King. Maybe you need to learn something ……

Anonymous wrote:There is some website that is aggregating all posts from people who are ‘celebrating’ his death and posting their names and employers.

Good.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You have to be careful here, too.

Your IP address is attached to every post you write here. Jeff has said he saves this info. If he received a subpoena, he will have to give that up. Then, poof, a lawyer or whoever has all your info.

so we are officially at this point where we are only allowed to agree with this administration. Freedom of speech is done?

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/fema-employee-placed-leave-saying-flags-shouldnt-half-staff-racist-homophobe-charlie-kirk.amp




Here is a good example.

You can disagree with the administration or the govt.

This federal worker was suspended.


But if he just said he disagreed with the govt flying the flags at half-staff for Kirk, that is fine, his right.

It when he threw in there that Kirk was a “Racist Homophobe”, that crosses the line into slander. He deserved the suspension for getting personal and making these accusations.

I don't even know what you are talking about but criticizing Charlie Kirk is entirely compatible with condemning his murder. I won't be careful or apologize.

Anonymous wrote:Charlie Kirk put out a list of professors who were then terrorized and received death threats. They should sue his estate.

+1 And this was the first thing he started doing, more than a decade ago. Before the podcast or the debates with students or the funding the insurrection. One of the first mentions of Kirk on this forum is here, from 2015. http://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/15/507821.page#7769711

“At a Texas Retreat convened last June by long-time neoconservative agitator David Horowitz, a baby-faced operative named Charlie Kirk outlined an “undercover, underground plan” to “control student funding,” “censor professors” and “get rid of free speech zones.” His plan focused on channeling right-wing money into a full-bore attack on the grassroots movement to boycott, sanction, and divest from Israel as a means to pressure the country into respecting Palestinian human rights, known as BDS. The BDS movement has spread across US campuses and European capitals since it was devised by Palestinian civil society groups in 2005.

Described by the National Journal as “the future of the conservative movement,” the 21-year-old Kirk is rapidly emerging as one the most influential right-wing campus organizers. Speaking before an audience of hundreds of conservative activists in a hotel ballroom in Dallas, Kirk laid out a strikingly authoritarian vision to systematically eradicate progressive political culture from American universities.

“What we’re doing in states like California, Massachusetts and New York, is we’re starting...a rather undercover, underground operation that is designed for one purpose only,” Kirk explained. “And that is to run -- and win -- Student Government Association races the same way we look at Congressional campaigns. If we can successfully retake the student governments...on these really, really far left campuses such as UC-Irvine, UCLA, and we run the student government association races with the same money, time, energy and resources [as] we do a Congressional campaign, then we can start to see...an effective, neutralizing factor on these campuses. You can control student funding, you can censor professors, you can get rid of free speech zones, you can then balance the curriculum, you then can use your student government post as a bully pulpit.”

http://www.alternet.org/c...ech-campus

It's the next big thing in conservative movements.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is some website that is aggregating all posts from people who are ‘celebrating’ his death and posting their names and employers.

Here is a link to the site https://www.charliesmurderers.com/

I wonder if someone is going to end up suing Squarespace Inc. into bankruptcy over that.

A lot of the posts are pretty reasonable.

NO! <stamps foot> THESE PEOPLE ARE MURDERERS FOR POSTING THEIR OPINIONS!!!!!1!1!!!!

Anonymous wrote:You have to be careful here, too.

Your IP address is attached to every post you write here. Jeff has said he saves this info. If he received a subpoena, he will have to give that up. Then, poof, a lawyer or whoever has all your info.

Good luck with that. IP addresses are in a pool and are periodically released and renewed. Imagine their f'-up when they bust down a neighbor's door and get the wrong person just because they use the same ISP. Stupid.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:RIP free speech.

No one is being jailed, this is called consequences. Remember when democrats loved saying free speech didn’t mean freedom from consequences when they canceled people the previous administration?

No one is owed a federal job.

Sounds woke to me.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is some website that is aggregating all posts from people who are ‘celebrating’ his death and posting their names and employers.

celebrating Charlie Kirk's death, even in mild ways, is another of those 80/20 issues where Democrats seem to be landing on the wrong side.

Spread hate, get hate. It's really not that hard to understand. And like with Kirk, saying hateful things is not a crime.

Your ilk lowered the standard of discourse to this level and now the chickens are coming home to roost. Maybe empathy and a little "woke" isn't so bad, huh? I certainly wish we could go back to a basic standard of kindness and tolerance toward each other, where hateful words aren't tolerated in polite society.

Anonymous wrote:RIP free speech.

No one is being jailed, this is called consequences. Remember when democrats loved saying free speech didn’t mean freedom from consequences when they canceled people the previous administration?

No one is owed a federal job.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You have to be careful here, too.

Your IP address is attached to every post you write here. Jeff has said he saves this info. If he received a subpoena, he will have to give that up. Then, poof, a lawyer or whoever has all your info

so we are officially at this point where we are only allowed to agree with this administration. Freedom of speech is done?

How does the overly simplistic woke chant go again?

Oh that’s right.

Freedom of speech doesn’t mean freedom from consequences.

So NOW you love cancel culture?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You have to be careful here, too.

Your IP address is attached to every post you write here. Jeff has said he saves this info. If he received a subpoena, he will have to give that up. Then, poof, a lawyer or whoever has all your info

so we are officially at this point where we are only allowed to agree with this administration. Freedom of speech is done?

How does the overly simplistic woke chant go again?

Oh that’s right.

Freedom of speech doesn’t mean freedom from consequences.

Anonymous wrote:I'm unemployed so there’s that

Best part of not having an employer / being self-employed.

Anonymous wrote:Good!!
Be held accountable for all of that hate that you spew here.

- former Dem, now centrist who is politically homeless

Pick a side, buddy.