Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would think the biggest issue would be attracting quality and qualified professors.
Given the academic job market, they will have zero problems attracting quality and qualified professors.
The trend is to hire adjunct and other contingent faculty because tenure/tenure track professors are considered too expensive. This hurts educational quality for everyone.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would think the biggest issue would be attracting quality and qualified professors.
You don't need more professors.
You do if you want to keep the same quality of instruction.
Not everyone is in the same major though. Intentionally.
If they had 100 students a year and maybe add two more students per major do you really think they need more professors in year one?
No, they can plan for it in year five.
Look for programs that are new at these schools - where they need more majors - when you are applying. Be strategic.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would think the biggest issue would be attracting quality and qualified professors.
Given the academic job market, they will have zero problems attracting quality and qualified professors.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would think the biggest issue would be attracting quality and qualified professors.
Given the academic job market, they will have zero problems attracting quality and qualified professors.
There is literally no more office space in my department’s building for additional offices and labs. I would love more colleagues and space , but I don’t think this is as easy as some of you are imagining
Buildings can always be added, altered, refurbished, etc. For an academic you have a very closed mind.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would think the biggest issue would be attracting quality and qualified professors.
Given the academic job market, they will have zero problems attracting quality and qualified professors.
There is literally no more office space in my department’s building for additional offices and labs. I would love more colleagues and space , but I don’t think this is as easy as some of you are imagining
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would think the biggest issue would be attracting quality and qualified professors.
Given the academic job market, they will have zero problems attracting quality and qualified professors.
There is literally no more office space in my department’s building for additional offices and labs. I would love more colleagues and space , but I don’t think this is as easy as some of you are imagining
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Many have been, and then parents and students and the community complain about over-crowded dorms, the school renting hotels, etc.
True. But Rice has been slowly expanding from 4000 to 5200 students over a few years. And they've built the infrastructure for it, including a new residential college. There's nothing haphazard about it. No one at Rice is enduring hotels or overcrowded dorms. Some years ago, the school decided it wanted to be a little bigger and planned accordingly. They certainly have the endowment for it.
This is how you do it. I realize not every university has the space to pull this off, but turning doubles into triples appears to be the new norm but cramming kids into small spaces together isn’t healthy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If Harvard wants to expand capacity to 100,000 students they can find enough students who are willing to pay full price. But then who would want to go to Harvard in that case?
Harvard can market its degrees by having a 2 tier system - in person and virtual. They can charge the same and droves of people would coke. They can even offer international students this option and get around any visa issues. They are name brand so it all depends on how they want to make money.
Harvard College, like many of the older schools and universities on the east coast, cannot grow due to lack of physical space. If you want the first-year students to have the "Yard" experience, that is in a set amount of rooms dating back to 1763. https://www.thecrimson.com/column/a-new-day-at-harvard/article/2021/2/12/berger-increase-undergrad-enrollment/
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would think the biggest issue would be attracting quality and qualified professors.
You don't need more professors.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would think the biggest issue would be attracting quality and qualified professors.
You don't need more professors.
You do if you want to keep the same quality of instruction.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would think the biggest issue would be attracting quality and qualified professors.
You don't need more professors.
Anonymous wrote:This is not just a matter of adding a dorm. They would have to raise course enrollment sizes then, build larger classrooms, and/or hire more professors and TAs, build offices for those professors, etc., unless parents are fine with larger classes, crappier grading due to staff shortages, and cramped facilities.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would think the biggest issue would be attracting quality and qualified professors.
Given the academic job market, they will have zero problems attracting quality and qualified professors.