Anonymous wrote:Does anyone have experience with the NoVa cotillions? I've found Northern Virginia Junior Cotillion and NLJC NOVA
Anonymous wrote:Just transitioned from public to private for middle school, where half the grade is doing Capital Cotillion, and there is general consternation about how new girls can't participate because they don't have enough boys.
This is not an issue for me as we wouldn't be doing it regardless, but it does make me pause and wonder: How does thing remain so popular and yet so totally frozen in amber? I have so many questions... If you are sending your young adolescents, do you worry about how alienating it may feel to LGBTQ adolescents who aren't "out" yet, and how do you handle that?
The website says "While we embrace tradition and the importance it plays in our society, we believe that keeping current with the needs of today’s youth is equally important. We prepare our students with social skills for the “elite experience” without promoting the elitist paradigm of the past."
The fact that they won't deviate from their 50-50 gender ratio just seems AWFULLY out of step. Can someone explain why someone can't do something more inclusive? There are plenty of ballroom dancing studios that manage to do better ....
(Also, a little more snarky now: How DOES "the elite experience" differs from "the elitist paradigm of the past"? Anyone able to explain?)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just transitioned from public to private for middle school, where half the grade is doing Capital Cotillion, and there is general consternation about how new girls can't participate because they don't have enough boys.
This is not an issue for me as we wouldn't be doing it regardless, but it does make me pause and wonder: How does thing remain so popular and yet so totally frozen in amber? I have so many questions... If you are sending your young adolescents, do you worry about how alienating it may feel to LGBTQ adolescents who aren't "out" yet, and how do you handle that?
The website says "While we embrace tradition and the importance it plays in our society, we believe that keeping current with the needs of today’s youth is equally important. We prepare our students with social skills for the “elite experience” without promoting the elitist paradigm of the past."
The fact that they won't deviate from their 50-50 gender ratio just seems AWFULLY out of step. Can someone explain why someone can't do something more inclusive? There are plenty of ballroom dancing studios that manage to do better ....
(Also, a little more snarky now: How DOES "the elite experience" differs from "the elitist paradigm of the past"? Anyone able to explain?)
Oh, don’t worry — there is a solution. The “Nonbinary Cotillion Parent Group Chat” is alive and well, we meet every Thursday night via encrypted Slack channel. Our syllabus covers:
Gender-Neutral Bowing: You incline exactly 37 degrees regardless of orientation.
Elitist Paradigm History 101: We discuss why "the elite experience" is just “elitism with better branding and Canva graphics.”
Cha-Cha But Make It Fluid: Partners are assigned based on astrology charts, not chromosomes.
We tried to pitch this to Capital Cotillion but were told that “the elite experience” required a strict 50/50 split because apparently math is tradition. (Nothing screams “timeless social grace” like spreadsheet quotas for 12-year-olds.)
As for LGBTQ kids not yet out? Don’t worry — Capital Cotillion does offer a cutting-edge inclusivity option: you can be “the quirky friend in the corner” or “the one who mysteriously has the flu every Friday evening until March.” Very forward-thinking.
Anonymous wrote:[/b]Anonymous[b wrote:]I didn't send my boys because I view it as elitist (and dumb). I was asked by a number of moms (of both girls and boys) to sign my kids up with theirs and I refused to do so.
And I chose to have both of my kids, boy and girl, do it. The daughter used it at dances at college. The son used it at formal dances and balls at Oxford and Harvard. He actually knew what to do at those events. When I went to Harvard from California, I didn't have a clue how to fox-trot, so I hid in a corner. I wanted my kids to kow how to behave, conduct themselves and dance in those situations. Your choice . . .
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They learn manners. That can't be bad. Isn't a LGBTQ issue
It is if the idea of girls dancing with other girls is so scary that they'd rather exclude girls who want to participate.
This is a little too glib. When you learn to dance, you learn the steps based on whether you lead or follow. Learning both is an advanced skill, and you don't usually learn both at the same time. Especially in a once-a-month class for kids where dancing is only part of the program: there's just not time for that level of dance instruction.
So if girls are dancing with other girls, one of them is learning to lead. I would not assume that a gay girl, even if out, necessarily wants to learn to lead. It would be very weird to put that pressure on her to choose. And a straight girl presumably does not want to learn to lead.
What you want is a cotillion class that doesn't include ballroom dancing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just transitioned from public to private for middle school, where half the grade is doing Capital Cotillion, and there is general consternation about how new girls can't participate because they don't have enough boys.
This is not an issue for me as we wouldn't be doing it regardless, but it does make me pause and wonder: How does thing remain so popular and yet so totally frozen in amber? I have so many questions... If you are sending your young adolescents, do you worry about how alienating it may feel to LGBTQ adolescents who aren't "out" yet, and how do you handle that?
The website says "While we embrace tradition and the importance it plays in our society, we believe that keeping current with the needs of today’s youth is equally important. We prepare our students with social skills for the “elite experience” without promoting the elitist paradigm of the past."
The fact that they won't deviate from their 50-50 gender ratio just seems AWFULLY out of step. Can someone explain why someone can't do something more inclusive? There are plenty of ballroom dancing studios that manage to do better ....
(Also, a little more snarky now: How DOES "the elite experience" differs from "the elitist paradigm of the past"? Anyone able to explain?)
Oh, don’t worry — there is a solution. The “Nonbinary Cotillion Parent Group Chat” is alive and well, we meet every Thursday night via encrypted Slack channel. Our syllabus covers:
Gender-Neutral Bowing: You incline exactly 37 degrees regardless of orientation.
Elitist Paradigm History 101: We discuss why "the elite experience" is just “elitism with better branding and Canva graphics.”
Cha-Cha But Make It Fluid: Partners are assigned based on astrology charts, not chromosomes.
We tried to pitch this to Capital Cotillion but were told that “the elite experience” required a strict 50/50 split because apparently math is tradition. (Nothing screams “timeless social grace” like spreadsheet quotas for 12-year-olds.)
As for LGBTQ kids not yet out? Don’t worry — Capital Cotillion does offer a cutting-edge inclusivity option: you can be “the quirky friend in the corner” or “the one who mysteriously has the flu every Friday evening until March.” Very forward-thinking.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just transitioned from public to private for middle school, where half the grade is doing Capital Cotillion, and there is general consternation about how new girls can't participate because they don't have enough boys.
This is not an issue for me as we wouldn't be doing it regardless, but it does make me pause and wonder: How does thing remain so popular and yet so totally frozen in amber? I have so many questions... If you are sending your young adolescents, do you worry about how alienating it may feel to LGBTQ adolescents who aren't "out" yet, and how do you handle that?
The website says "While we embrace tradition and the importance it plays in our society, we believe that keeping current with the needs of today’s youth is equally important. We prepare our students with social skills for the “elite experience” without promoting the elitist paradigm of the past."
The fact that they won't deviate from their 50-50 gender ratio just seems AWFULLY out of step. Can someone explain why someone can't do something more inclusive? There are plenty of ballroom dancing studios that manage to do better ....
(Also, a little more snarky now: How DOES "the elite experience" differs from "the elitist paradigm of the past"? Anyone able to explain?)
Oh, don’t worry — there is a solution. The “Nonbinary Cotillion Parent Group Chat” is alive and well, we meet every Thursday night via encrypted Slack channel. Our syllabus covers:
Gender-Neutral Bowing: You incline exactly 37 degrees regardless of orientation.
Elitist Paradigm History 101: We discuss why "the elite experience" is just “elitism with better branding and Canva graphics.”
Cha-Cha But Make It Fluid: Partners are assigned based on astrology charts, not chromosomes.
We tried to pitch this to Capital Cotillion but were told that “the elite experience” required a strict 50/50 split because apparently math is tradition. (Nothing screams “timeless social grace” like spreadsheet quotas for 12-year-olds.)
As for LGBTQ kids not yet out? Don’t worry — Capital Cotillion does offer a cutting-edge inclusivity option: you can be “the quirky friend in the corner” or “the one who mysteriously has the flu every Friday evening until March.” Very forward-thinking.
Anonymous wrote:Just transitioned from public to private for middle school, where half the grade is doing Capital Cotillion, and there is general consternation about how new girls can't participate because they don't have enough boys.
This is not an issue for me as we wouldn't be doing it regardless, but it does make me pause and wonder: How does thing remain so popular and yet so totally frozen in amber? I have so many questions... If you are sending your young adolescents, do you worry about how alienating it may feel to LGBTQ adolescents who aren't "out" yet, and how do you handle that?
The website says "While we embrace tradition and the importance it plays in our society, we believe that keeping current with the needs of today’s youth is equally important. We prepare our students with social skills for the “elite experience” without promoting the elitist paradigm of the past."
The fact that they won't deviate from their 50-50 gender ratio just seems AWFULLY out of step. Can someone explain why someone can't do something more inclusive? There are plenty of ballroom dancing studios that manage to do better ....
(Also, a little more snarky now: How DOES "the elite experience" differs from "the elitist paradigm of the past"? Anyone able to explain?)
Anonymous wrote:[/b]Anonymous[b wrote:]I didn't send my boys because I view it as elitist (and dumb). I was asked by a number of moms (of both girls and boys) to sign my kids up with theirs and I refused to do so.
And I chose to have both of my kids, boy and girl, do it. The daughter used it at dances at college. The son used it at formal dances and balls at Oxford and Harvard. He actually knew what to do at those events. When I went to Harvard from California, I didn't have a clue how to fox-trot, so I hid in a corner. I wanted my kids to kow how to behave, conduct themselves and dance in those situations. Your choice . . .
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They learn manners. That can't be bad. Isn't a LGBTQ issue
It is if the idea of girls dancing with other girls is so scary that they'd rather exclude girls who want to participate.
This is a little too glib. When you learn to dance, you learn the steps based on whether you lead or follow. Learning both is an advanced skill, and you don't usually learn both at the same time. Especially in a once-a-month class for kids where dancing is only part of the program: there's just not time for that level of dance instruction.
So if girls are dancing with other girls, one of them is learning to lead. I would not assume that a gay girl, even if out, necessarily wants to learn to lead. It would be very weird to put that pressure on her to choose. And a straight girl presumably does not want to learn to lead.
What you want is a cotillion class that doesn't include ballroom dancing.
What about a cotillion where everyone learns to be both leaders and followers.