Anonymous wrote:^LOL!
Anonymous wrote:Hello, just curious what might yield a better trajectory for an ambitious kid. It seems UPenn kids flood Wall Street and tech at a level only matched by Harvard and Stanford, while Duke also has very good placements but perhaps is less prominent in Wall Street, but Duke might benefit from a more loyal alumni network. Thoughts?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anyone doing resume review is going to weigh grades/internships/etc. Much more heavily than the name of the school.
Here's the real secrets they'll also do that when weighing say, Penn vs. Penn State.
What people don't realize is that by you are 22, the achievements that got you into college happened 5-8 years ago. At 22, that's incredibly stale information. Someone who's a superstar at 17 might continue to be one, but they might not. 17 year old also may have matured a lot. High school is a different world.
That continues. By the time you're say, 26, your college grades are also stale and all anyone cares about is work performance. College is different from the working world as well and actual job performance is way more usable data.
Yeah, I think this is true. At a certain point, college just because a bragging point. Duke vs Penn is really a pointless distinction. Both schools are very elite, but neither are HYPSM-tier. They'll both grant access into the most selective firms. Personally, I'd go for Duke because of the weather, sports, and social scene. Penn can also be great for the right student, but both schools are more similar than different. Penn is filled with prep school social climbers and wannabe frat boys.
Anonymous wrote:Since when did Duke and Penn become comparable. Penn culturally is close Brown and Columbia certainly not anything like Duke.
Anonymous wrote:Anyone doing resume review is going to weigh grades/internships/etc. Much more heavily than the name of the school.
Here's the real secrets they'll also do that when weighing say, Penn vs. Penn State.
What people don't realize is that by you are 22, the achievements that got you into college happened 5-8 years ago. At 22, that's incredibly stale information. Someone who's a superstar at 17 might continue to be one, but they might not. 17 year old also may have matured a lot. High school is a different world.
That continues. By the time you're say, 26, your college grades are also stale and all anyone cares about is work performance. College is different from the working world as well and actual job performance is way more usable data.
Anonymous wrote:My oldest was deciding between Penn, Duke, and a few others and picked Duke. He ended up on Wall Street, like most of his classmates who had that interest. Both schools will get you where you want, I would think more about cultural fit.
Anonymous wrote:Maybe get into one of them first? Duke just had a 4.5% acceptance rate and UPenn had a 4.9% acceptance rate.