Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wonder how many will take it

If they were eligible last time and didn’t take it, why would they take it now?

Still waiting for the agency to just announce what their manning target is. Why is it such a secret?

i heard several people who commented they would have elected a clean VERA/VSIP, but it was only possible the first time around to elect it in conjunction with the DRP. So I guess we will see how many of them will take it now.

also it's a secret because the uncertainty is more demoralizing, you twit.

This actually flat wrong…. Some people did miss the DRP, which was offered in combination with a VERA and regretted it. Some wanted a clean VERA/VSIP because at the time, no one knew whether the DRP was legal. Then, later, the agency offered a clean VERA/VSIP which more people took.

So it is a legit question to ask but we’ve also had RTO and if someone was on the fence about whether to stay or go, or RTO is just not working, I could see where they would take this. Or take the demotion and not have to worry about managing people.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why do they have to send out so many nasty missives about who and who cannot do VERA?

What do they say? I'm at a different agency, but I too am bothered by the tone and wording of emails sent to us from the top.

All the italics, bolds and underlines!

They’re probably sick of people not reading directions and applying for Vera when not eligible, which wastes HR’s time.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why do they have to send out so many nasty missives about who and who cannot do VERA?

What do they say? I'm at a different agency, but I too am bothered by the tone and wording of emails sent to us from the top.

All the italics, bolds and underlines!

Anonymous wrote:I thought doge was over. Are we still doing this crap? When do the 5 bullets start again?

Aren't they still in the building? At least the rooms are still papered.

Anonymous wrote:I thought doge was over. Are we still doing this crap? When do the 5 bullets start again?

It's part of project 2025 and all of that is alive and well.

I thought doge was over. Are we still doing this crap? When do the 5 bullets start again?

The notice is fine, we are wondering if many people will take it. I am Vera eligible but not going to go.

Anonymous wrote:Why do they have to send out so many nasty missives about who and who cannot do VERA?

What do they say? I'm at a different agency, but I too am bothered by the tone and wording of emails sent to us from the top.

Anonymous wrote:Why do they have to send out so many nasty missives about who and who cannot do VERA?

They want to make sure you know your place and even though you're management you're still just a parasite to them.

Anonymous wrote:Why do they have to send out so many nasty missives about who and who cannot do VERA?

You must be mgmt. regular staff haven’t received any missives, nasty or kind.

I couldn’t write a credible “nasty missive” about Vera eligibility if I tried. What do they say? “You suck, you’re not eligible.!”??

Why do they have to send out so many nasty missives about who and who cannot do VERA?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wonder how many will take it

If they were eligible last time and didn’t take it, why would they take it now?

Still waiting for the agency to just announce what their manning target is. Why is it such a secret?

i heard several people who commented they would have elected a clean VERA/VSIP, but it was only possible the first time around to elect it in conjunction with the DRP. So I guess we will see how many of them will take it now.

also it's a secret because the uncertainty is more demoralizing, you twit.

It’s the “you twit” poster again.

This person is outing himself. Everyone at the agency knows who talks like that.

wait- sheriff nottingham at OUR agency?! my stars!

RIP Alan Rickman, the best villain.

lol. They’re simultaneously posting a PUBLIC position for a supervisor in OGC. One step forward, two steps back.