Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you play on the end field, your ball will consistently roll down the hill to the parking lot because it's not fenced behind the goal and there's a steep hill right behind. Super annoying.
Yeah, balls going into bushes and trees at Soccerplex should have that place shut down
Anonymous wrote:\Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The only games we’ve played there are state cup. It’s a long drive but we typically make long drives for soccer. We didn’t like the lack of restroom facilities but to be fair, this is a complaint at many fields. I don’t understand how bathrooms are not a consideration when these places are built. I’m tired of having to leave fields mid-game and drive to a business with a bathroom. And what about the players? But I digress. I think the park is no better nor worse than many places. It’s not a place I’d choose but it gave us an excuse to visit Annapolis.
ITA, especially for teenage girls dealing with tampons etc. Ridiculous and gross not to have bathrooms and sinks for hand washing.
Like Muldoon Farms nice bathrooms
Yes, this field is a terrible experience, just like Muldoon. Agree!
Let's start by comparing the parking at both
Then let's compare the quality of fields at both
The use of portojohns which is common at many sporting events makes the whole facility terrible?
OK, so I think we've established that this person definitely is involved with the ownership of this crappy field complex! No one else would care that much.
Yes, use of portapotties is a HUGE negative. How is this difficult to grasp?
It's a negative, even with some portables being much better than others.
So are solid bathrooms negative at tournaments and games not maintained and are a disaster by noon on Day 1
Oh goodness, with the $$$. pouring in from the tournament fees, a custodian could be on site to keep things tidy.
\Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The only games we’ve played there are state cup. It’s a long drive but we typically make long drives for soccer. We didn’t like the lack of restroom facilities but to be fair, this is a complaint at many fields. I don’t understand how bathrooms are not a consideration when these places are built. I’m tired of having to leave fields mid-game and drive to a business with a bathroom. And what about the players? But I digress. I think the park is no better nor worse than many places. It’s not a place I’d choose but it gave us an excuse to visit Annapolis.
ITA, especially for teenage girls dealing with tampons etc. Ridiculous and gross not to have bathrooms and sinks for hand washing.
Like Muldoon Farms nice bathrooms
Yes, this field is a terrible experience, just like Muldoon. Agree!
Let's start by comparing the parking at both
Then let's compare the quality of fields at both
The use of portojohns which is common at many sporting events makes the whole facility terrible?
OK, so I think we've established that this person definitely is involved with the ownership of this crappy field complex! No one else would care that much.
Yes, use of portapotties is a HUGE negative. How is this difficult to grasp?
It's a negative, even with some portables being much better than others.
So are solid bathrooms negative at tournaments and games not maintained and are a disaster by noon on Day 1
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The only games we’ve played there are state cup. It’s a long drive but we typically make long drives for soccer. We didn’t like the lack of restroom facilities but to be fair, this is a complaint at many fields. I don’t understand how bathrooms are not a consideration when these places are built. I’m tired of having to leave fields mid-game and drive to a business with a bathroom. And what about the players? But I digress. I think the park is no better nor worse than many places. It’s not a place I’d choose but it gave us an excuse to visit Annapolis.
ITA, especially for teenage girls dealing with tampons etc. Ridiculous and gross not to have bathrooms and sinks for hand washing.
Like Muldoon Farms nice bathrooms
Yes, this field is a terrible experience, just like Muldoon. Agree!
Let's start by comparing the parking at both
Then let's compare the quality of fields at both
The use of portojohns which is common at many sporting events makes the whole facility terrible?
OK, so I think we've established that this person definitely is involved with the ownership of this crappy field complex! No one else would care that much.
Yes, use of portapotties is a HUGE negative. How is this difficult to grasp?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The only games we’ve played there are state cup. It’s a long drive but we typically make long drives for soccer. We didn’t like the lack of restroom facilities but to be fair, this is a complaint at many fields. I don’t understand how bathrooms are not a consideration when these places are built. I’m tired of having to leave fields mid-game and drive to a business with a bathroom. And what about the players? But I digress. I think the park is no better nor worse than many places. It’s not a place I’d choose but it gave us an excuse to visit Annapolis.
ITA, especially for teenage girls dealing with tampons etc. Ridiculous and gross not to have bathrooms and sinks for hand washing.
Like Muldoon Farms nice bathrooms
Yes, this field is a terrible experience, just like Muldoon. Agree!
Let's start by comparing the parking at both
Then let's compare the quality of fields at both
The use of portojohns which is common at many sporting events makes the whole facility terrible?
Anonymous wrote:If you play on the end field, your ball will consistently roll down the hill to the parking lot because it's not fenced behind the goal and there's a steep hill right behind. Super annoying.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is it privately owned? Its not owned by the county?
Its weird that a posted jumped in ASAP to keep defending a random field. Who cares that much?
How is the complex named in the headline of this thread and also random?
Just think its odd that someone is so angry that anyone is critiquing the field.
One opinion is fine, the opposing is angry lol
btw it's a sports complex of many fields
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The only games we’ve played there are state cup. It’s a long drive but we typically make long drives for soccer. We didn’t like the lack of restroom facilities but to be fair, this is a complaint at many fields. I don’t understand how bathrooms are not a consideration when these places are built. I’m tired of having to leave fields mid-game and drive to a business with a bathroom. And what about the players? But I digress. I think the park is no better nor worse than many places. It’s not a place I’d choose but it gave us an excuse to visit Annapolis.
ITA, especially for teenage girls dealing with tampons etc. Ridiculous and gross not to have bathrooms and sinks for hand washing.
Like Muldoon Farms nice bathrooms
Yes, this field is a terrible experience, just like Muldoon. Agree!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is it privately owned? Its not owned by the county?
Its weird that a posted jumped in ASAP to keep defending a random field. Who cares that much?
How is the complex named in the headline of this thread and also random?
Just think its odd that someone is so angry that anyone is critiquing the field.