Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He was arrested by MPD. Did the officer ask him to back up? Did he ask him to move away from them?
It is hard to hear what was said by the MPD officer. If he did tell him to move away, and he refused, then an arrest is appropriate.
*If* the officer asked him to move away, did he have a reason? Finding the public annoying is not a good enough reason.
I guess the judge will decide that.
If an officer of the law gives you an order to move you better damn well follow it.
lol, no. If they are giving you illegal orders force them to arrest you and then go to court. You don’t let bad cops dictate the law.
The cops are definitely stepping out of bounds.
In Washington Crackdown, Making a Federal Case Out of Low-Level Arrests
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/08/24/us/politics/trump-dc-crime-takeover-federal-court.html?unlocked_article_code=1.gk8.9QNX.GAmvkQuKRR6F&smid=url-share
The stream of defendants who shuffled through a federal courtroom on Thursday afternoon illustrated the new ways in which laws are being enforced in the nation’s capital after the president’s takeover of the city’s police. They were appearing before a magistrate judge on charges that would typically be handled at the local court level, if they were filed at all.
"One man had been arrested over an open container of alcohol. Another had been charged with threatening the president after delivering a drunken outburst following his arrest on vandalism. And one defendant’s gun case so alarmed prosecutors that they intend to drop the case."
Anonymous wrote:The guy was too close to the scene. He’s within arms reach of officers who are doing a potentially dangerous job. Generally you need to stand about 25 feet back from police activity and you can film all you want, just like his comrade did without incident. All these sidewalk lawyers are hopped up on adrenaline and really don’t know what they’re doing. I’m sure charges will be dropped and he will have his trophy story. But this is why being a cop in DC is an impossible job.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The National Guard? I took a photo yesterday no issues with Guard. I think it was ICE and DC police. Bullies!!
I think that the NG is stuck following fascist orders for now. I am sort of glad that they are there because at some point they might have to save us from the Gestapo.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He was arrested by MPD. Did the officer ask him to back up? Did he ask him to move away from them?
It is hard to hear what was said by the MPD officer. If he did tell him to move away, and he refused, then an arrest is appropriate.
*If* the officer asked him to move away, did he have a reason? Finding the public annoying is not a good enough reason.
I guess the judge will decide that.
If an officer of the law gives you an order to move you better damn well follow it.
lol, no. If they are giving you illegal orders force them to arrest you and then go to court. You don’t let bad cops dictate the law.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He was arrested by MPD. Did the officer ask him to back up? Did he ask him to move away from them?
It is hard to hear what was said by the MPD officer. If he did tell him to move away, and he refused, then an arrest is appropriate.
*If* the officer asked him to move away, did he have a reason? Finding the public annoying is not a good enough reason.
I guess the judge will decide that.
If an officer of the law gives you an order to move you better damn well follow it.
lol, no. If they are giving you illegal orders force them to arrest you and then go to court. You don’t let bad cops dictate the law.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He was arrested by MPD. Did the officer ask him to back up? Did he ask him to move away from them?
It is hard to hear what was said by the MPD officer. If he did tell him to move away, and he refused, then an arrest is appropriate.
*If* the officer asked him to move away, did he have a reason? Finding the public annoying is not a good enough reason.
I guess the judge will decide that.
If an officer of the law gives you an order to move you better damn well follow it.
Anonymous wrote:The guy was too close to the scene. He’s within arms reach of officers who are doing a potentially dangerous job. Generally you need to stand about 25 feet back from police activity and you can film all you want, just like his comrade did without incident. All these sidewalk lawyers are hopped up on adrenaline and really don’t know what they’re doing. I’m sure charges will be dropped and he will have his trophy story. But this is why being a cop in DC is an impossible job.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He was arrested by MPD. Did the officer ask him to back up? Did he ask him to move away from them?
It is hard to hear what was said by the MPD officer. If he did tell him to move away, and he refused, then an arrest is appropriate.
*If* the officer asked him to move away, did he have a reason? Finding the public annoying is not a good enough reason.
Anonymous wrote:It's a felony to impede a federal arrest
Anonymous wrote:He was arrested by MPD. Did the officer ask him to back up? Did he ask him to move away from them?
It is hard to hear what was said by the MPD officer. If he did tell him to move away, and he refused, then an arrest is appropriate.