Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You being broke is not the issue. All of your baggage is an issue. You are 46 years old, you have a failed marriage, you don’t have your kids full time, you live in an apartment, you don’t make a lot of money. What part of that are you a catch for a woman in her 40’s?
OP here. I totally agree with you. I don't necessarily consider my career to have been a total failure. In this economy I am thankful to have a job where I make $210k. For some of you it's nothing I get it.
Yes you kid of stated the obvious ain't no catch i am not acting like one. I am just venting chill a bit.
OP, don't take this PP's comments personally. There are troll(s) that go from thread to thread with the intent to kick people down when they already are hurting. That's on them, no reflection on you.
$210K is a very nice income. This area is tough with the HCOL. If you truly are paying 50% more than required by court decree, you sound like you are a nice person. Some nice lady is going to make note of that. Money isn't everything but nice human beings are worth their weight in gold. Join social groups such as hiking groups and see where things go.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You being broke is not the issue. All of your baggage is an issue. You are 46 years old, you have a failed marriage, you don’t have your kids full time, you live in an apartment, you don’t make a lot of money. What part of that are you a catch for a woman in her 40’s?
OP here. I totally agree with you. I don't necessarily consider my career to have been a total failure. In this economy I am thankful to have a job where I make $210k. For some of you it's nothing I get it.
Yes you kid of stated the obvious ain't no catch i am not acting like one. I am just venting chill a bit.
Anonymous wrote:You don’t. Get your money up and then start dating again.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You are giving your ex 50% more than child support (based on what calculation if not divorced?), but don't have custody of your kids at all? Its the last part that would get me....
This- it's like he's guilty of something.
Maybe why he didn't get custody.
Dude you need to work on yourself and be a good in-person dad to your kids and not just a wallet.
Anonymous wrote:The responses here so far are scary. Now I understand why people who once had money suddenly decide to end their lives when they go trough hardship. It's crazy how much some of you see everything through money.
I'm glad my husband took a chance on me a simple staff making $70k at a nonprofit.
Yes! Exactly!Anonymous wrote:This is a confidence issue more than a money issue. Lots of women would date a guy like you, especially if he's in decent shape and financially stable (though not well off). The key is to do things that are fun. Many fun things are free or inexpensive.
Running and hiking. Going to festivals and hearing some lesser known bands play live music. Cooking at home. Many galleries and museums (especially in DC). Use your imagination. You don't have to take your date to dinner at The Palm and a show at the Kennedy Center.
Anonymous wrote:OP this feels like a troll post but okay.
I’m dating a super attractive 42 year old guy who is pretty broke! The reason it works is because I don’t really need anything from him- financially. I want his money to be spent on his kids. I am financially independent and value things like honesty, humor, reliability, intellect, heart and sexual compatibility before I consider money.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You being broke is not the issue. All of your baggage is an issue. You are 46 years old, you have a failed marriage, you don’t have your kids full time, you live in an apartment, you don’t make a lot of money. What part of that are you a catch for a woman in her 40’s?
So mean! Are you implying having his kids full time would make him MORE of a catch?