Anonymous wrote:or where is it at?
instead of just
where is it?
Anonymous wrote:“I want something to sip on” makes more sense than “I want something to sip”
Anonymous wrote:I'm welcoming on.
Anonymous wrote:Don't forget "welcome in."
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sippin' on gin and juice
Laid back
With my mind on my money and my money on my mind
It's not new.
Sipping on a chili dog
outside the tastee freeze
It's not a matter of bieng new. It's new to here.
It’s “sucking on a chili dog,” you Philistine!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sippin' on gin and juice
Laid back
With my mind on my money and my money on my mind
It's not new.
Sipping on a chili dog
outside the tastee freeze
It's not a matter of bieng new. It's new to here.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sippin' on gin and juice
Laid back
With my mind on my money and my money on my mind
It's not new.
No no no! You mind money. On is unnecessary.
-Grammar Nazi
I am actually a Grammar Nazi too, but that's Snoop Dogg you need to counsel.![]()
Anonymous wrote:I've noticed a trend of adding "on" to verbs that don't really require it. My fitness instructor tells us to "grab on" our weights, a newspaper article I just read described someone as "sipping on" a matcha latte. "Grabbing" your weights and "sipping" your matcha latte is just as grammatically correct (if not more so), and simpler, so why has this linguistic trend appeared?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's because people come from different parts of the country. There are a lot of variations of simple things like this, depending on where you live (or are from).
My least favorite right now is "On tomorrow" "On yesterday." So stupid sounding. Not sure what part of the country this is from but not a very well educated one.
I’ve lived all over and the only people I hear say it that way are middle-aged Black folks...of all socioeconomic statuses and geographic backgrounds. I always figured it was some part of AAVE.