Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Despite all the talk about superscoring, atleast at the T10 privates, there is a huge advantage to taking the test one time and getting a good score.
AO's cannot unsee the super scoring. They know the student had to try multiple times to mash up a good score.
AOs do not see the super scoring, the software shows them only the top scores.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Despite all the talk about superscoring, atleast at the T10 privates, there is a huge advantage to taking the test one time and getting a good score.
AO's cannot unsee the super scoring. They know the student had to try multiple times to mash up a good score.
You're an idiot. The AOs never see the individual scores. Administrative staff "super" the scores and the AOs only see the one score. That's the whole point.
So much misinformation on this website. It's worse than the White House.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Despite all the talk about superscoring, atleast at the T10 privates, there is a huge advantage to taking the test one time and getting a good score.
AO's cannot unsee the super scoring. They know the student had to try multiple times to mash up a good score.
You're an idiot. The AOs never see the individual scores. Administrative staff "super" the scores and the AOs only see the one score. That's the whole point.
So much misinformation on this website. It's worse than the White House.
Let me get this right…
so they see only the best scores of the English and Maths,( even if you take it 3 times)?
Some of them require an official score report from College Board, and for those you'd choose your two best test dates. (With the exception of Georgetown, as mentioned by a PP.)
But, most of them will let you self-report scores in Common App. You just put your highest score for each section and the test date.
Anonymous wrote:Despite all the talk about superscoring, atleast at the T10 privates, there is a huge advantage to taking the test one time and getting a good score.
AO's cannot unsee the super scoring. They know the student had to try multiple times to mash up a good score.
Anonymous wrote:The problem is all the test centers are full now all the way to december. If juniors haven't already signed up for retake, it's going to be difficult to find a spot.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would stop if it exceeds the threshold for merit. Getting merit is probably the best investment one can make. Zero capital huge return.
Most t20 schools don't give merit and if they do, they certainly don't publish a minimum score.
Honey, so only kids aiming for t20 can participate in this discussion?
I am so tired of people taking every opportunity as their bragging point.
GMAFB
DP, but OP specifically asked what score you'd stop at for a kid aiming for t20. So it's not a bragging point, just the framework of the conversation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would stop if it exceeds the threshold for merit. Getting merit is probably the best investment one can make. Zero capital huge return.
Most t20 schools don't give merit and if they do, they certainly don't publish a minimum score.
Honey, so only kids aiming for t20 can participate in this discussion?
I am so tired of people taking every opportunity as their bragging point.
GMAFB
Anonymous wrote:My kid got a 750/750 first try.
Did it twice more w no further studying. And we live a walkable distance from test site.
Ended up w a 750/800 superscore.
Had August test date scheduled but canceled that one.