Anonymous wrote:You’re working from the wrong premise. The college market is all about product differentiation. Every school wants a niche, otherwise it’s just a stats game. Oberlin attracts a certain kind of student, and that kind of student wants oberlin as is. They agree with the bakery lawsuit.
Remember the New Yorker article about Oberljn a few years ago? I recently re-read it and googled the students named in the article. They’re all in super-left jobs, came out as nonbinary, etc. Not my thing, but it’s clearly a valid path for those who want it.
Anonymous wrote:In Gary Shteyngart’s new book, he calls Oberlin the “college of fading repute.” He is an alumnus.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Imagine sitting down and thinking to yourself, let me start some shit about Oberlin, a school that barely meets the DCUM snob threshold. Someone really needs attention today.
It doesn’t even meet the threshold. It’s a third tier school, not sure why op is talking about it.
Anonymous wrote:Did not read your post and came on here only to say your title makes the post, and the whole silly thread, not worth reading…
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Also reject the premise and so think the entire thread is useless.
Also wondering about the degree of sockpuppetry. May just check with the mod.
All these puppet defenders. We get it you're blind, but us news isn't.
Oh, where did they call the school a failed school?
When they ranked it outside the top quartile.
Anonymous wrote:Imagine sitting down and thinking to yourself, let me start some shit about Oberlin, a school that barely meets the DCUM snob threshold. Someone really needs attention today.