Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I had a 12-year-old boy on a bike stop me on the street because he was lost (we live in a super safe community) and he wanted to call his mom. He asked if he could use my phone and of course I said yes, then waited with him while his mom drove to pick him up.
I thought it was so cool that this kid didn’t have a phone but felt empowered to approach a safe-looking stranger and problem-solve. So many kids are terrified of talking to strangers, don’t know how to judge “safe” from “unsafe” or sketchy looking, and wouldn’t have a clue how to get out of a jam without a personal cell phone.
Sharing as I think this is an unconventional reason to not get a phone too early. This kid was able to have a really nice conversation with me while we waited and was super polite and thankful. Those are the skills that kids should be developing.
Not all strangers are good people. He got lucky.
AMEN
Anonymous wrote:We got the kids “dumb” phones in 6th grade. Basic flip phones. DS got a smart phone when he was 13. We will not get DD a smart phone before Highschool. The only thing they “need” a phone for in middle school is for calling and light texting. It is too much of a temptation and distraction. And it is a lot of work on us to monitor, set limits, etc. Delay as much as possible. You won’t regret delaying…
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I can't believe with all the data and social science we have in front of us now people are still considering and defending getting kids this young phones.
NP. Thank you.
Throughout the Biden years, more the 1/2 the US states joined lawsuits against social phone media companies. Just 2 simple facts are the basis for these ongoing lawsuits against smartphones for youth:
1) social media is known to be harmful to young people, and
2) social media is made intentionally addictive.
Look, Google it. The lawsuits are still going on. Entire states are plaintiffs.
What sane parent could know this and still give their child a phone before 14?
Anonymous wrote:I can't believe with all the data and social science we have in front of us now people are still considering and defending getting kids this young phones.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:From my older sister’s experience. Her daughter was not allowed to get a phone until she was 14. Turns out she’s had burner phones since she was 12. Whenever a new iPhone came out and her friends got the new one, they would give her their old one. The thing about iPhones is that you don’t need a cell service for apps, imessage and FaceTime etc. You just need WiFi and an appleID. So for two years my niece had unrestricted cell phone use because her parents didn’t even know she had a phone
I know of a similar story. Parents only found out when they had unrelated router trouble, and came across the list of devices connected to their home WiFi, and one item was titled something like, Lucy’s iPhone.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I had a 12-year-old boy on a bike stop me on the street because he was lost (we live in a super safe community) and he wanted to call his mom. He asked if he could use my phone and of course I said yes, then waited with him while his mom drove to pick him up.
I thought it was so cool that this kid didn’t have a phone but felt empowered to approach a safe-looking stranger and problem-solve. So many kids are terrified of talking to strangers, don’t know how to judge “safe” from “unsafe” or sketchy looking, and wouldn’t have a clue how to get out of a jam without a personal cell phone.
Sharing as I think this is an unconventional reason to not get a phone too early. This kid was able to have a really nice conversation with me while we waited and was super polite and thankful. Those are the skills that kids should be developing.
Not all strangers are good people. He got lucky.
AMEN