Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you are a supervisor you are probably obligated to report the violation of the anti fraternization policy and can be disciplined yourself for failing to report it.
The fact that he’s married isn’t really relevant for the work purposes but it sounds like they are violating a policy and, even if not, most companies have rules designed to ensure that people aren’t in a position to give their paramours work related favors (eg ensuring that they aren’t involved in the other persons evaluation or in any promotion process).
This is OP. Him being married is relevant in this situation. But they are on the same level, so it’s not a special favors situation.
In what world is being married "relevant"? It is not MYOB about that part.
If you want to report the affair because it is against policy for two employees to be in a relationship, then do it in person.
If you want to tell his wife as a personal thing go right ahead. This is a separate issue from the work relationship.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you are a supervisor you are probably obligated to report the violation of the anti fraternization policy and can be disciplined yourself for failing to report it.
The fact that he’s married isn’t really relevant for the work purposes but it sounds like they are violating a policy and, even if not, most companies have rules designed to ensure that people aren’t in a position to give their paramours work related favors (eg ensuring that they aren’t involved in the other persons evaluation or in any promotion process).
This is OP. Him being married is relevant in this situation. But they are on the same level, so it’s not a special favors situation.
In what world is being married "relevant"? It is not MYOB about that part.
If you want to report the affair because it is against policy for two employees to be in a relationship, then do it in person.
If you want to tell his wife as a personal thing go right ahead. This is a separate issue from the work relationship.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you are a supervisor you are probably obligated to report the violation of the anti fraternization policy and can be disciplined yourself for failing to report it.
The fact that he’s married isn’t really relevant for the work purposes but it sounds like they are violating a policy and, even if not, most companies have rules designed to ensure that people aren’t in a position to give their paramours work related favors (eg ensuring that they aren’t involved in the other persons evaluation or in any promotion process).
This is OP. Him being married is relevant in this situation. But they are on the same level, so it’s not a special favors situation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you are a supervisor you are probably obligated to report the violation of the anti fraternization policy and can be disciplined yourself for failing to report it.
The fact that he’s married isn’t really relevant for the work purposes but it sounds like they are violating a policy and, even if not, most companies have rules designed to ensure that people aren’t in a position to give their paramours work related favors (eg ensuring that they aren’t involved in the other persons evaluation or in any promotion process).
This is OP. Him being married is relevant in this situation. But they are on the same level, so it’s not a special favors situation.
For work, no. I'm guessing your handbook doesn't specify a different consequence for married APs vs single APs?
But I can see you judging from here, so please don't confuse workplace policy with your own sense of morals or ethics.
The military treats these offenses differently.
Really? Why don't you elaborate.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you are a supervisor you are probably obligated to report the violation of the anti fraternization policy and can be disciplined yourself for failing to report it.
The fact that he’s married isn’t really relevant for the work purposes but it sounds like they are violating a policy and, even if not, most companies have rules designed to ensure that people aren’t in a position to give their paramours work related favors (eg ensuring that they aren’t involved in the other persons evaluation or in any promotion process).
Ask for a meeting with HR and report it verbally. Let them decide next steps.
You are aware of a violation of policy and so is another uninvolved employee. You are in a prisoner's dilemma. You could get in trouble if you don't report and the other person does.
To whoever said "Recall the e-mail", that function is disabled at my company. And sometimes unopened e-mails can be seen from pre-view notifications, panes, etc.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Where has OP told us this was military, for God's sakes? Who are these people making stuff up?
Or does OP not adhere to basic message board etiquette and posts without identifying themselves?
They were responding to the person who said no job cares about adultery.
OP did not identify themselves except for this response:
"This is OP. Him being married is relevant in this situation. But they are on the same level, so it’s not a special favors situation. "
Nowhere does it say military. "Relevant" is suspect in a world where some people believe adultery to be a mortal sin, and others simply couldn't care less. People could assume OP is leading with her personal beliefs.
Anonymous wrote:If it comes up later, just say may have opened it, but you didn't read it. This happens all the time.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Where has OP told us this was military, for God's sakes? Who are these people making stuff up?
Or does OP not adhere to basic message board etiquette and posts without identifying themselves?
They were responding to the person who said no job cares about adultery.
OP did not identify themselves except for this response:
"This is OP. Him being married is relevant in this situation. But they are on the same level, so it’s not a special favors situation. "
Nowhere does it say military. "Relevant" is suspect in a world where some people believe adultery to be a mortal sin, and others simply couldn't care less. People could assume OP is leading with her personal beliefs.
Anonymous wrote:Just pretend you didn't notice. No one will thank you for intervening. Whereas you may cause misery.