Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:UCLA has been violating civil rights law.

Can you name the civil law violated? Serious question

DP

The civil rights act.

Anonymous wrote:Why don’t universities fight this extortion, make them prove there was “discrimination”. It’s cheaper than shelling out hundreds of millions of dollars.

Because they ARE discriminating. And paying is cheaper than losing accreditation and tax exempt status.

Anonymous wrote:
UCLA is rich enough. Hard working taxpayers shouldn’t be forced to make UCLA even more wealthy.

Wow the idiot has joined the chat

It’s a bribe you idiot that all taxpayer will pay and it will not go to pay the national debt it’s going to Trump directly dam fool

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Stand up America!!! Stand the fk up!

This is fascism.

exactly. anyone cheering this on has not read history. trump's on the wrong side period. and those that cheer it on and/or captitulate to trump are also wrong.

do not go gentle into this dark night. rage rage against the dying of the light.

fight this menace!

You think a bunch of wealthy white elitists screaming about the Fed cutting off access to TAXPAYER monies for other obscenely wealthy institutions that discriminate against a wide swath of Americans via their admissions practices and their obscene costs is going to get average people to "rage rage against the dying of the light"????? Now THAT IS FUNNY!

It would garner as much outrage as if Trump banned Shakespeare on the National Mall for casting Oprah Winfrey as Othello. Nobody would care

Anonymous wrote:First we have to get rid of all the maga idiots. There are more Americans than there are maga. There’s no reason our country, and the world, needs to be impacted by these fleas.

You realize Trump won the popular vote, right?

Frankel v UCLA-
UCLA allowed protestors to stop Jewish students from entering buildings/crossing parts of campus unless they verbally disclaimed Israel's right to exist. That is conduct, not speech, you get to shout hate but you don't get to block or limit other students access to campus. These offenders were subject to the school's code of conduct and should have been expelled or otherwise prevented (i.e. arrested if needed). Straight up discrimination on the basis of religion/national origin not speech and not protected

Anonymous wrote:How about he focus on the economy? Instead of his personal revenge vendetta tour ?

You sure you want him focusing on the economy?

I feel like it would be better off left alone

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
UCLA is rich enough. Hard working taxpayers shouldn’t be forced to make UCLA even more wealthy.

Well then why only target certain schools, bird brain? This is the most obvious politically driven move that I have even seen a US presidential administration take. Seriously, I’m struggling to think of another. It’s absolute lunacy and driven by lunatics…with support from bird brains. That’s all

Yup. When they go after Liberty U…

Anonymous wrote:Stand up America!!! Stand the fk up!

This is fascism.

Where are all the colleges? Only like 16 signed the amicus brief for Harvard.

So gross. Why aren’t they sticking together and protesting this corruption?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:UCLA has been violating civil rights law.

Can you name the civil law violated? Serious question

It failed to crush the First Amendment rights of pro-Palestinian protesters with jackboots and clubs. This kind omission now constitutes antisemitism. First Amendment rights should only be protected when they involve a violent insurrection in the Capitol or tiki-torch welding protofascists.

Anonymous wrote:F--- Trump.

UCLA is test blind anyway and since grading varies significantly across different schools, there is no "objective" criteria for them to evaluate. Everything is holistic or subjective.

It's all about the essays and EC list.

doubt the fed lawyers can make a clear case here since they don't take any AP, SAT or ACT tests and are TEST BLIND.

True.

F--- Trump.

UCLA is test blind anyway and since grading varies significantly across different schools, there is no "objective" criteria for them to evaluate. Everything is holistic or subjective.

It's all about the essays and EC list.

doubt the fed lawyers can make a clear case here since they don't take any AP, SAT or ACT tests and are TEST BLIND.

Anonymous wrote:UCLA has been violating civil rights law.

Can you name the civil law violated? Serious question

Anonymous wrote:
UCLA is rich enough. Hard working taxpayers shouldn’t be forced to make UCLA even more wealthy.

Well then why only target certain schools, bird brain? This is the most obvious politically driven move that I have even seen a US presidential administration take. Seriously, I’m struggling to think of another. It’s absolute lunacy and driven by lunatics…with support from bird brains. That’s all

UCLA has been violating civil rights law.