Anonymous wrote:Examples op?
Anonymous wrote:Yes, now I can't find a stick of deodorant for less than $10.
Brooks running shoes which I like... They used to be $100-$120 tops, now they are like $170.
These aren't just like 5-10% price hikes, this is much more! It's annoying.
Anonymous wrote:Yes, now I can't find a stick of deodorant for less than $10.
Brooks running shoes which I like... They used to be $100-$120 tops, now they are like $170.
These aren't just like 5-10% price hikes, this is much more! It's annoying.
Anonymous wrote:Yes, now I can't find a stick of deodorant for less than $10.
Brooks running shoes which I like... They used to be $100-$120 tops, now they are like $170.
These aren't just like 5-10% price hikes, this is much more! It's annoying.
Anonymous wrote:I gather I may notice if we need to make a big ticket replacement. It's hard to pay attention to everyday small retail items.
What's so stupid is that now European and Japanese cars will be much cheaper than American cars because they only have a 15% tariff while US manufacturers have a 50% tariff on steel, aluminum and copper as well as a 35% tariff on parts from Canada and Mexico.
But at least now US cars won't have a tariff in the EU or Japan...where huge gas guzzling SUVs are just so popular (not).
Talk about the easiest deal point to agree...sure, we agree to 0% tariffs on a product where maybe 10 people in the country will buy it.
Anonymous wrote:Doesn't matter. If people can't/won't pay the higher prices then they will lower them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Stop whining. This is what winning looks like.
Senator Hawley is going to send every American $600 from the vast amount of tariff money the US has collected from the losers in other countries.
Hopefully you are being sarcastic. If not, we pay tariffs not other countries.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, there was some delay in the tariffs working their way through the supply chain. This is only the beginning. Even if they backtracked immediately, it's been baked in for months now.
Let’s face it. Even we avoided having new tariffs, retailers wouldve hiked prices anyways.
This. Retailers are price gouging and it's been proven time and again, since the egg crisis. It seems in nobody's interest to fight it since corporate greed is so strong (and enriching). Even Kamala vowed to fight it during her election-- but (and I don't say this often) she was in position to DO SOMETHING THEN as VP and the administration did not. Trumps a stainy POS. So I don't think any politician will really tackle this no matter what they say. They like the bribes too much.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Stop whining. This is what winning looks like.
Senator Hawley is going to send every American $600 from the vast amount of tariff money the US has collected from the losers in other countries.
Coincidence or fate?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smoot%E2%80%93Hawley_Tariff_Act
Anonymous wrote:Stop whining. This is what winning looks like.
Senator Hawley is going to send every American $600 from the vast amount of tariff money the US has collected from the losers in other countries.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, there was some delay in the tariffs working their way through the supply chain. This is only the beginning. Even if they backtracked immediately, it's been baked in for months now.
Let’s face it. Even we avoided having new tariffs, retailers wouldve hiked prices anyways.
This. Retailers are price gouging and it's been proven time and again, since the egg crisis. It seems in nobody's interest to fight it since corporate greed is so strong (and enriching). Even Kamala vowed to fight it during her election-- but (and I don't say this often) she was in position to DO SOMETHING THEN as VP and the administration did not. Trumps a stainy POS. So I don't think any politician will really tackle this no matter what they say. They like the bribes too much.