There is no right not to be offended, that’s where this all went wrong. They need to get over it.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not interested in returning to a time when newspapers called it "the Washington football team" because the official name was a racial slur.
I wouldn't have picked "Commanders" either but it works and it's done.
What if the overwhelming majority of Native Americans don’t find the Washington Redskins name offensive, but a small minority of White people do?
Newspapers, wha’s that ? Go Skins !Anonymous wrote:Not interested in returning to a time when newspapers called it "the Washington football team" because the official name was a racial slur.
I wouldn't have picked "Commanders" either but it works and it's done.
Anonymous wrote:Let’s poll Native Americans. If a majority are fine with it then the pale face liberals can slink away.
Anonymous wrote:Redskins. No has an issue with Vikings or Fighting Irish, but they'd prefer to have Native American history fade away. If they are going to change anything they should have removed Washington, that name is associated with slavery and the massacre of Native Americans.
Anonymous wrote:Would love to see the results if only fans of the team voted. Most that objected were fans of other teams or didn’t care about the sport.
Anonymous wrote:We are never going back to Redskins so I don’t even know why we’re having this discussion.
Commanders sucks it’s a terrible name.
I like the Washington football team. Our nickname should be the team.
Anonymous wrote:Seriously, we're still going to call people Redskins? And are we going to call them Orange skins and Pink skins and brown skins and white skins and black skins and yellow skins?
Why pick such an offensive mascot named for some physical characteristic that no person can change? Just choose some animal like wolves or lions or falcons or sharks etc and be done with it.
Anonymous wrote: