Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is there any information on the timing of all of this? Wondering on a personal level for my rising 8th grader, but also interested more generally about the transition plan for these changes.
The changes will start going into effect fall 2027, but (unless the Board votes down the MCPS recommendation) the plan is to grandfather all kids already enrolled in academic programs or consortium schools before then. So your rising 8th grader should get to stay wherever they start 9th grade, but the classes behind them will change over to the new rules
Thank you! I'm having a hard time digging through all the information lately.
And how the school district staffs schools while standing up new regional programs and grandfathering legacy programs is anyone's guess.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm a DCC parent and have no issues with the consortium going away
Aren't the new regional programming going to mimic the system wee already have in the NEC and DCC (except for the countywide magnets going away)?
If people are choosing their consortium school for the special academic programs, then yes, it will be largely replicated through the new regional system.
If people are choosing their consortium school for other reasons, then no. Are there many kids/families who choose their consortium school for other reasons? What are they?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Staff at the schools will be ecstatic if/when the consortia go away.
Why do you say that?
It is extremely difficult to overcome the challenges of having so many students coming from various areas, both from a vertical articulation standpoint and getting the community to support the school.
High school counselors and administrators, in an ideal situation, work closely with their feeder middle schools to ensure smooth transitions to high school. It's much easier to do with one or two middle schools where almost every student goes to the same high school. Much more challenging when there are so many middle schools and they are split between either three or five high schools.
Getting students to participate in after school activities is a challenge when transportation is a challenge in the consortia.
The families and community are not connected to the consortia schools to the degree they are in the community schools.
I wonder if these issues will now be spread throughout the county with the regional model though. Maybe they should just focus on having a core set of AP/IB classes actually offered at each school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm a DCC parent and have no issues with the consortium going away
You must not live in the Kennedy catchment area.
Yeah we are zoned for Einstein and don't see that changing. I guess I'm curious if kids zoned for Kennedy have real choices under the DCC model if they don't get into a magnet? What are the odds of getting into a different HS under the choice process?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm a DCC parent and have no issues with the consortium going away
You must not live in the Kennedy catchment area.
Yeah we are zoned for Einstein and don't see that changing. I guess I'm curious if kids zoned for Kennedy have real choices under the DCC model if they don't get into a magnet? What are the odds of getting into a different HS under the choice process?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm a DCC parent and have no issues with the consortium going away
You must not live in the Kennedy catchment area.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Current DCC parent and I'm fine with it. There was little genuine choice and most kids stuck with home schools or magnets.
The new approach seems better
Current NEC parent and I agree completely. It’s time for the NEC and DCC to go.
The NEC has always been shortchanged. How will the new regional system benefit the northeast county? We'll see...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm a DCC parent and have no issues with the consortium going away
You must not live in the Kennedy catchment area.
Anonymous wrote:I'm a DCC parent and have no issues with the consortium going away
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is there any information on the timing of all of this? Wondering on a personal level for my rising 8th grader, but also interested more generally about the transition plan for these changes.
The changes will start going into effect fall 2027, but (unless the Board votes down the MCPS recommendation) the plan is to grandfather all kids already enrolled in academic programs or consortium schools before then. So your rising 8th grader should get to stay wherever they start 9th grade, but the classes behind them will change over to the new rules
Thank you! I'm having a hard time digging through all the information lately.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Current DCC parent and I'm fine with it. There was little genuine choice and most kids stuck with home schools or magnets.
The new approach seems better
Current NEC parent and I agree completely. It’s time for the NEC and DCC to go.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is there any information on the timing of all of this? Wondering on a personal level for my rising 8th grader, but also interested more generally about the transition plan for these changes.
The changes will start going into effect fall 2027, but (unless the Board votes down the MCPS recommendation) the plan is to grandfather all kids already enrolled in academic programs or consortium schools before then. So your rising 8th grader should get to stay wherever they start 9th grade, but the classes behind them will change over to the new rules
Anonymous wrote:Is there any information on the timing of all of this? Wondering on a personal level for my rising 8th grader, but also interested more generally about the transition plan for these changes.