Anonymous wrote:Did you know that the first reader at Stanford can reject an application without anyone else ever looking at it? This is why that Admittedly guy (former Stanford AO I believe) says not to REA to Stanford if you don’t have a hook. The reader your app gets could be new and so your REA app is more likely to be rejected due to inexperience. By the time RD rolls around, they have more experience.
Don’t know if this is true at other schools.
If the
trained reader knows it’s a clean “no,” why would you want more reads?
People here get apoplectic over how long it takes to get results and you are mad they don’t slow down to give more time to the non-competitive applications?