Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Umm, controlling fires and forest management is not the same as controlling the weather.
Do liberals know how to read?
They know how to read, but the problem is that they are amazing at logical fallacies and poster children for the Dunning-Kruger effect.
The combination brings us DCUM democrats.
OMG, you people are such bad faith dimwits. Who ties your shoes for you? Nobody said the letter literally comes out and asks Canada to control the weather. The title of the thread is an ironic joke highlighting the impossibility of this demand, as in “they’re asking for the moon”. When they demand that Canada stop its forest fires, the only way Canada can do that is by altering the weather conditions, because they are the actual root cause. The letter writers leave that out because they don’t understand, or care, enough to do any real research.
The letter is dumb, but asking Canada to better manage its forests is not asking it to change the weather. Forest management is a science and Canada is not practicing it well, if at all.
And, ahem, the OP said "Congress members send a letter asking Canada to control the weather." I take her word that she actually believes this is what the letter said.
Anonymous wrote:https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/11/world/canada/wildfire-smoke-manitoba-us-congress.html
The shame of being American continues. The US is a disaster with raging fires, floods killing Americans, tornadoes that can wipe out a whole town, hurricanes with names. But the Republicans thought it might be a good time to tell Canada that their weather disasters are bothering us.
Yep, because we are a role model for climate control and self control. Aholes
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Umm, controlling fires and forest management is not the same as controlling the weather.
Do liberals know how to read?
They know how to read, but the problem is that they are amazing at logical fallacies and poster children for the Dunning-Kruger effect.
The combination brings us DCUM democrats.
OMG, you people are such bad faith dimwits. Who ties your shoes for you? Nobody said the letter literally comes out and asks Canada to control the weather. The title of the thread is an ironic joke highlighting the impossibility of this demand, as in “they’re asking for the moon”. When they demand that Canada stop its forest fires, the only way Canada can do that is by altering the weather conditions, because they are the actual root cause. The letter writers leave that out because they don’t understand, or care, enough to do any real research.
The letter is dumb, but asking Canada to better manage its forests is not asking it to change the weather. Forest management is a science and Canada is not practicing it well, if at all.
And, ahem, the OP said "Congress members send a letter asking Canada to control the weather." I take her word that she actually believes this is what the letter said.
Anonymous wrote:I took OP’s reference to be a head nod toward the effects of climate change and how the right glosses over the signs of climate change, reduces the matter to one of forest management alone, and ties it all up in a bow with tone deaf prattling.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Umm, controlling fires and forest management is not the same as controlling the weather.
Do liberals know how to read?
They know how to read, but the problem is that they are amazing at logical fallacies and poster children for the Dunning-Kruger effect.
The combination brings us DCUM democrats.
And if anyone mentions controlling floods so as not to kill innocent children, I bet you'd whine that this isn't the right time. It's never the right time to point out that the US can't control it's own wildfires and flash floods, isn't it?
Terminal hypocrite.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Umm, controlling fires and forest management is not the same as controlling the weather.
Do liberals know how to read?
They know how to read, but the problem is that they are amazing at logical fallacies and poster children for the Dunning-Kruger effect.
The combination brings us DCUM democrats.
OMG, you people are such bad faith dimwits. Who ties your shoes for you? Nobody said the letter literally comes out and asks Canada to control the weather. The title of the thread is an ironic joke highlighting the impossibility of this demand, as in “they’re asking for the moon”. When they demand that Canada stop its forest fires, the only way Canada can do that is by altering the weather conditions, because they are the actual root cause. The letter writers leave that out because they don’t understand, or care, enough to do any real research.
The letter is dumb, but asking Canada to better manage its forests is not asking it to change the weather. Forest management is a science and Canada is not practicing it well, if at all.
And, ahem, the OP said "Congress members send a letter asking Canada to control the weather." I take her word that she actually believes this is what the letter said.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Umm, controlling fires and forest management is not the same as controlling the weather.
Do liberals know how to read?
They know how to read, but the problem is that they are amazing at logical fallacies and poster children for the Dunning-Kruger effect.
The combination brings us DCUM democrats.
OMG, you people are such bad faith dimwits. Who ties your shoes for you? Nobody said the letter literally comes out and asks Canada to control the weather. The title of the thread is an ironic joke highlighting the impossibility of this demand, as in “they’re asking for the moon”. When they demand that Canada stop its forest fires, the only way Canada can do that is by altering the weather conditions, because they are the actual root cause. The letter writers leave that out because they don’t understand, or care, enough to do any real research.
The letter is dumb, but asking Canada to better manage its forests is not asking it to change the weather. Forest management is a science and Canada is not practicing it well, if at all.
And, ahem, the OP said "Congress members send a letter asking Canada to control the weather." I take her word that she actually believes this is what the letter said.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Umm, controlling fires and forest management is not the same as controlling the weather.
Do liberals know how to read?
They know how to read, but the problem is that they are amazing at logical fallacies and poster children for the Dunning-Kruger effect.
The combination brings us DCUM democrats.
OMG, you people are such bad faith dimwits. Who ties your shoes for you? Nobody said the letter literally comes out and asks Canada to control the weather. The title of the thread is an ironic joke highlighting the impossibility of this demand, as in “they’re asking for the moon”. When they demand that Canada stop its forest fires, the only way Canada can do that is by altering the weather conditions, because they are the actual root cause. The letter writers leave that out because they don’t understand, or care, enough to do any real research.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Umm, controlling fires and forest management is not the same as controlling the weather.
Do liberals know how to read?
Do conservatives know how to read a map? The vast majority of burned acreage is occurring in the Boreal forest, hundreds of miles from any settlement. This is unmanaged Forest, more remote than the interior of Alaska. The idea that Canada is going to send a chainsaw crew to “manage” this ecosystem is laughable.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Umm, controlling fires and forest management is not the same as controlling the weather.
Do liberals know how to read?
They know how to read, but the problem is that they are amazing at logical fallacies and poster children for the Dunning-Kruger effect.
The combination brings us DCUM democrats.
And if anyone mentions controlling floods so as not to kill innocent children, I bet you'd whine that this isn't the right time. It's never the right time to point out that the US can't control it's own wildfires and flash floods, isn't it?
Terminal hypocrite.
Nuance isn't your strong suit. No human could have stopped the flash flood that happened in Texas. But humans had the means to control the LA wildfires, but incompetence and bureaucracy won in that scenario.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Umm, controlling fires and forest management is not the same as controlling the weather.
Do liberals know how to read?
They know how to read, but the problem is that they are amazing at logical fallacies and poster children for the Dunning-Kruger effect.
The combination brings us DCUM democrats.
Go on. What's your suggestion there, Dunning-Kruger? Bedazzle us with your cognitive ability.