Anonymous wrote:OP wants schools as good as HYPSM without the brand name or recognition. All the suggestions like Mudd or Brown have recognized names. Surely DCUM can do better and give OP a great unrecognized school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Well those are the top ones, OP.
Other good universities:
*Rest of the Ivies
'*Duke
*Northwestern
*U of Chicago
*Notre Dame
*BC
*Vanderbilt
*Good state universities- Berkeley, UCLA, UVA, UNC, U Mich, U WI, U TX, WM
*Williams
*Amherst
*Swarthmore
*Pomona
*Middlebury
Many others
+1
I'd add Bowdoin and Carleton to this list.
Anonymous wrote:Well those are the top ones, OP.
Other good universities:
*Rest of the Ivies
'*Duke
*Northwestern
*U of Chicago
*Notre Dame
*BC
*Vanderbilt
*Good state universities- Berkeley, UCLA, UVA, UNC, U Mich, U WI, U TX, WM
*Williams
*Amherst
*Swarthmore
*Pomona
*Middlebury
Many others
Anonymous wrote:Nobody separates the Ivies like the psychos on dcum. lol They are all regarded highly, as are the other T10/20s.
Anonymous wrote:OP wants schools as good as HYPSM without the brand name or recognition. All the suggestions like Mudd or Brown have recognized names. Surely DCUM can do better and give OP a great unrecognized school.
Anonymous wrote:The key is in the kid, not in the school. If that kid has all it takes, they will stand out in the real world no matter the SAME kid goes to T5 or T5000.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:in terms of education rigor, quality of peer group, faculty, campus experience, research opportunities, employment outcome, networks…but just not as prestigious? We want very high-stat DC to apply to the best quality schools without wasting REA/ED for the brand name
Anything in top 50 works.
Was coming here to say this - except I was thinking top 30 LAC and top 30 universities. It’s really shades of grey across those in terms of academic rigor and quality education - obviously the big names have more well known alum, faculty, and name recognition.
The biggest problem you run into is that if you go to a top 30 or 50 school odds are the HR screener went to a community college. That person will recognize Harvard but maybe not Bates nor necessarily know that Johns Hopkins or Notre Dame are great school. In my personal life I basically know no one who didn’t go to a top school. Professionally, I can 90% of the time tell if someone went to a tier 3-4 school in just brief interactions.
You’ll get a quality education at most of the top 30-50ish, maybe even better depending on major than at the highest ranked schools, but there are obviously other factors that make those top ranked school more desirable and peerless.
Bates in a same sentence with Harvard, Johns Hopkins, and Notre Dame? ...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:WASP
Of potential interest, Rice appears in this Princeton Review survey-based site, "Their Students Love These Colleges":
https://www.princetonreview.com/college-rankings/?rankings=their-students-love-these-colleges
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:in terms of education rigor, quality of peer group, faculty, campus experience, research opportunities, employment outcome, networks…but just not as prestigious? We want very high-stat DC to apply to the best quality schools without wasting REA/ED for the brand name
Anything in top 50 works.
Was coming here to say this - except I was thinking top 30 LAC and top 30 universities. It’s really shades of grey across those in terms of academic rigor and quality education - obviously the big names have more well known alum, faculty, and name recognition.
The biggest problem you run into is that if you go to a top 30 or 50 school odds are the HR screener went to a community college. That person will recognize Harvard but maybe not Bates nor necessarily know that Johns Hopkins or Notre Dame are great school. In my personal life I basically know no one who didn’t go to a top school. Professionally, I can 90% of the time tell if someone went to a tier 3-4 school in just brief interactions.
You’ll get a quality education at most of the top 30-50ish, maybe even better depending on major than at the highest ranked schools, but there are obviously other factors that make those top ranked school more desirable and peerless.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:in terms of education rigor, quality of peer group, faculty, campus experience, research opportunities, employment outcome, networks…but just not as prestigious? We want very high-stat DC to apply to the best quality schools without wasting REA/ED for the brand name
Anything in top 50 works.
Was coming here to say this - except I was thinking top 30 LAC and top 30 universities. It’s really shades of grey across those in terms of academic rigor and quality education - obviously the big names have more well known alum, faculty, and name recognition.
The biggest problem you run into is that if you go to a top 30 or 50 school odds are the HR screener went to a community college. That person will recognize Harvard but maybe not Bates nor necessarily know that Johns Hopkins or Notre Dame are great school. In my personal life I basically know no one who didn’t go to a top school. Professionally, I can 90% of the time tell if someone went to a tier 3-4 school in just brief interactions.
You’ll get a quality education at most of the top 30-50ish, maybe even better depending on major than at the highest ranked schools, but there are obviously other factors that make those top ranked school more desirable and peerless.
Insufferable. Guess you haven't met many tech CEOs who went to tier 3-4 schools. For tech, state flagships are the better places than any of the top 30 lac.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:in terms of education rigor, quality of peer group, faculty, campus experience, research opportunities, employment outcome, networks…but just not as prestigious? We want very high-stat DC to apply to the best quality schools without wasting REA/ED for the brand name
Anything in top 50 works.
Was coming here to say this - except I was thinking top 30 LAC and top 30 universities. It’s really shades of grey across those in terms of academic rigor and quality education - obviously the big names have more well known alum, faculty, and name recognition.
The biggest problem you run into is that if you go to a top 30 or 50 school odds are the HR screener went to a community college. That person will recognize Harvard but maybe not Bates nor necessarily know that Johns Hopkins or Notre Dame are great school. In my personal life I basically know no one who didn’t go to a top school. Professionally, I can 90% of the time tell if someone went to a tier 3-4 school in just brief interactions.
You’ll get a quality education at most of the top 30-50ish, maybe even better depending on major than at the highest ranked schools, but there are obviously other factors that make those top ranked school more desirable and peerless.