Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You need to think about whether your kid will make it through engineering school. Seriously.
I disagree. But the kid described should avoid an engineering program with deliberate weed-out classes.
That would rule out ODU and VT, in Virginia, for example. Fine schools, but both have intentional weed out classes.
Everyone here will disagree, but I would at least apply to UVa Engineering if in state. UVa would place some admissions weight on those kinds of service projects. UVa is small and more supportive and has a high graduation rate in engineering for students who start in engineering.
Depending in student's intended major within engineering, consider CNU and GMU and UMBC.
Lol “weed out” classes exist to “weed out” kids who can’t be engineers. And just stop on UVA. Zero chance. Zero.
No, they exist because the major is oversubscribed any many schools want fewer students in the high level classes.
No, they're not "oversubscribed" because they were admitted to a program which by definition means they have the space. It's all part of the process. Not everyone is meant to be an engineering. And the idea that there are colleges who will admit applicants to engineering programs primarily on the basis of service hours in high school and not academics is laughable and naive. That's not how the admissions process works for ANY major, and especially STEM majors. First you have to have the academics, and only then do AdComs look at the ECs.
I don't know what to tell you. My child has completed the application process successfully (not top 20, but her dream engineering schools) with mediocre grades (mostly Bs, with a smattering of Cs and As) and really strong ECs.

Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You need to think about whether your kid will make it through engineering school. Seriously.
I disagree. But the kid described should avoid an engineering program with deliberate weed-out classes.
That would rule out ODU and VT, in Virginia, for example. Fine schools, but both have intentional weed out classes.
Everyone here will disagree, but I would at least apply to UVa Engineering if in state. UVa would place some admissions weight on those kinds of service projects. UVa is small and more supportive and has a high graduation rate in engineering for students who start in engineering.
Depending in student's intended major within engineering, consider CNU and GMU and UMBC.
Lol “weed out” classes exist to “weed out” kids who can’t be engineers. And just stop on UVA. Zero chance. Zero.
No, they exist because the major is oversubscribed any many schools want fewer students in the high level classes.
No, they're not "oversubscribed" because they were admitted to a program which by definition means they have the space. It's all part of the process. Not everyone is meant to be an engineering. And the idea that there are colleges who will admit applicants to engineering programs primarily on the basis of service hours in high school and not academics is laughable and naive. That's not how the admissions process works for ANY major, and especially STEM majors. First you have to have the academics, and only then do AdComs look at the ECs.
Anonymous wrote:Engineering is a grind almost anywhere. Would a B student want that or is this more parent-driven?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You need to think about whether your kid will make it through engineering school. Seriously.
I disagree. But the kid described should avoid an engineering program with deliberate weed-out classes.
That would rule out ODU and VT, in Virginia, for example. Fine schools, but both have intentional weed out classes.
Everyone here will disagree, but I would at least apply to UVa Engineering if in state. UVa would place some admissions weight on those kinds of service projects. UVa is small and more supportive and has a high graduation rate in engineering for students who start in engineering.
Depending in student's intended major within engineering, consider CNU and GMU and UMBC.
Lol “weed out” classes exist to “weed out” kids who can’t be engineers. And just stop on UVA. Zero chance. Zero.
No, they exist because the major is oversubscribed any many schools want fewer students in the high level classes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You need to think about whether your kid will make it through engineering school. Seriously.
I disagree. But the kid described should avoid an engineering program with deliberate weed-out classes.
That would rule out ODU and VT, in Virginia, for example. Fine schools, but both have intentional weed out classes.
Everyone here will disagree, but I would at least apply to UVa Engineering if in state. UVa would place some admissions weight on those kinds of service projects. UVa is small and more supportive and has a high graduation rate in engineering for students who start in engineering.
Depending in student's intended major within engineering, consider CNU and GMU and UMBC.
Lol “weed out” classes exist to “weed out” kids who can’t be engineers. And just stop on UVA. Zero chance. Zero.
Anonymous wrote:Cornell, hotel management.
Along the line of hospitality, operations, real estate development, or sustainable lodging, etc.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You need to think about whether your kid will make it through engineering school. Seriously.
I disagree. But the kid described should avoid an engineering program with deliberate weed-out classes.
That would rule out ODU and VT, in Virginia, for example. Fine schools, but both have intentional weed out classes.
Everyone here will disagree, but I would at least apply to UVa Engineering if in state. UVa would place some admissions weight on those kinds of service projects. UVa is small and more supportive and has a high graduation rate in engineering for students who start in engineering.
Depending in student's intended major within engineering, consider CNU and GMU and UMBC.
Anonymous wrote:Kettering