Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yeah, I’m going to assume this was a Trump DOJ hit job until proven otherwise. Someone’s getting revenge for him going after an actual child molester.
Yes, of course this is what you'd assume. Couldn't possibly be that an editor of a liberal newspaper had child porn on his computer. You people... disgusting.
It's not a liberal newspaper, bumpkin.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He should just flee to Israel so he can be granted immunity like numerous other sex offenders
https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/2022-07-25/ty-article/.premium/tip-of-the-iceberg-how-foreign-sex-offenders-find-refuge-in-israel/00000182-3532-d7e9-af96-3d73c52c0000
Does Bibi protect only Jewish rapists, or anyone?
Anonymous wrote:Yeah, I’m going to assume this was a Trump DOJ hit job until proven otherwise. Someone’s getting revenge for him going after an actual child molester.
Anonymous wrote:He should just flee to Israel so he can be granted immunity like numerous other sex offenders
https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/2022-07-25/ty-article/.premium/tip-of-the-iceberg-how-foreign-sex-offenders-find-refuge-in-israel/00000182-3532-d7e9-af96-3d73c52c0000
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At first, I took this story at face value.
But now with more info, I see that they used 2006 payment accounts with a suspect company as the basis for a 2025 search warrant, which allegedly found a folder with verboten photos. Is that correct?
That is fishy. I'm grossed out by anyone viewing child porn -- I don't think it's a victimless crime.
But where is the chatroom activity and the allegations of soliciting minors and stuff like that? I hope there is more here, or else they should be prioritizing the more dangerous offenders.
One does have to wonder about the politics at play here.
It would appear they have evidence of recent illegal activity (see quotes below). And, he had 11 videos on his computer and a smashed hard drive in the hallway.
Anyone who has child porn on their computers needs to be arrested and investigated.
"The FBI said he was snared when the bureau opened a new investigation last month, when a court approved the tracking of a Verizon account owned by LeGro."
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/media/article-14855411/Washington-Post-journalist-Thomas-Pham-LeGro-charged-possession-child-pornography.html
"The affidavit notes that the FBI received court approval to monitor LeGro’s internet account in May."
https://nypost.com/2025/06/27/us-news/washington-post-journalist-busted-by-jeanine-pirro-for-allegedly-possessing-child-porn/
Anonymous wrote:At first, I took this story at face value.
But now with more info, I see that they used 2006 payment accounts with a suspect company as the basis for a 2025 search warrant, which allegedly found a folder with verboten photos. Is that correct?
That is fishy. I'm grossed out by anyone viewing child porn -- I don't think it's a victimless crime.
But where is the chatroom activity and the allegations of soliciting minors and stuff like that? I hope there is more here, or else they should be prioritizing the more dangerous offenders.
One does have to wonder about the politics at play here.